From phma@phma.optus.nu Wed Aug 01 08:16:10 2007 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list llg-members); Wed, 01 Aug 2007 08:16:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from phma.optus.nu ([166.82.175.165] helo=ixazon.dynip.com) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1IGFvh-00056M-9g for llg-members@lojban.org; Wed, 01 Aug 2007 08:16:08 -0700 Received: from chausie (unknown [192.168.7.4]) by ixazon.dynip.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18341CE79A for ; Wed, 1 Aug 2007 11:15:59 -0400 (EDT) From: Pierre Abbat To: llg-members@lojban.org Subject: [llg-members] Re: Create Lojban geocaching coins? Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2007 11:15:54 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.5 References: <46AFD145.7020902@lojban.org> In-Reply-To: <46AFD145.7020902@lojban.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200708011115.54956.phma@phma.optus.nu> X-Spam-Score: 0.1 X-Spam-Score-Int: 1 X-Spam-Bar: / X-archive-position: 305 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: llg-members-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: llg-members-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: phma@phma.optus.nu Precedence: bulk Reply-to: llg-members@lojban.org X-list: llg-members On Tuesday 31 July 2007 20:18, Bob LeChevalier wrote: > Nora suggests that we put a large "bi" on one side and "zo'o'o .e lo > botpi be lo xalka" on the other, but she says that this isn't a serious > suggestion. Shouldn't that be "jikru"? Or is there a more specific word? Pierre