From jjllambias@gmail.com Wed Aug 01 08:49:53 2007 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list llg-members); Wed, 01 Aug 2007 08:49:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from el-out-1112.google.com ([209.85.162.178]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1IGGSL-0005pQ-BS for llg-members@lojban.org; Wed, 01 Aug 2007 08:49:52 -0700 Received: by el-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id j27so37730elf for ; Wed, 01 Aug 2007 08:49:47 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=l5aTs0z92Xx1lkvzopwPR8eU8NXnJfVqKtWuLGTZMsULB2mTc15IVQN6F/5vuWPXUveivHTlZvBPpswcmS/gb6dIRYUDXheDPwY9Kfoxw6dcsiKVSvWpISuzU3w8hTyyDbfedM5x1LaKlndldE1yOByRPZRB/w9Vth8/9zlz+a0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=gKnrtatBI+SfYGWF7Mb5pg6fsWZpumeIe4kUvmeXba0VybocRSEgyxgapIPvVjM0Jg1mOrojAZejMhbjYFT155IfBus1n58cOci/iKn8S7KLcNj2rkOUo7wdcolz8qT5xECjFPgM6o6WJu1/ut3E6e5TKmLD91AmrmADHwhyBHs= Received: by 10.100.189.17 with SMTP id m17mr491851anf.1185983387526; Wed, 01 Aug 2007 08:49:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.100.42.17 with HTTP; Wed, 1 Aug 2007 08:49:47 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <925d17560708010849h4d95c8f4x7a0fd1a6a0601ba8@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2007 12:49:47 -0300 From: "=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jorge_Llamb=EDas?=" To: llg-members@lojban.org Subject: [llg-members] Re: Create Lojban geocaching coins? In-Reply-To: <200708011115.54956.phma@phma.optus.nu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <46AFD145.7020902@lojban.org> <200708011115.54956.phma@phma.optus.nu> X-Spam-Score: 0.0 X-Spam-Score-Int: 0 X-Spam-Bar: / X-archive-position: 306 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: llg-members-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: llg-members-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: jjllambias@gmail.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: llg-members@lojban.org X-list: llg-members On 8/1/07, Pierre Abbat wrote: > On Tuesday 31 July 2007 20:18, Bob LeChevalier wrote: > > Nora suggests that we put a large "bi" on one side and "zo'o'o .e lo > > botpi be lo xalka" on the other, but she says that this isn't a serious > > suggestion. > > Shouldn't that be "jikru"? Or is there a more specific word? {jikru} makes more sense. Also, {.e lo botpi be lo xalka} is not a grammatical fragment, although perhaps it should be made grammatical given that it seems to be a popular mistake. I've seen things like {to .e ko'a toi} a few times. Also, if you're coining a new cmavo for "yo ho ho", why {zo'o'o} rather than {io'o'o}? It can't be an extension of {zo'o} because "yo ho ho" is not a mark of humor. I was able to track down "yo ho ho and a bottle of rum", but where does the {bi} come from? mu'o mi'e xorxes