From rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Sun Oct 07 22:20:21 2007 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list llg-members); Sun, 07 Oct 2007 22:20:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rlpowell by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1Iel2S-0002OG-Uc for llg-members@lojban.org; Sun, 07 Oct 2007 22:20:21 -0700 Date: Sun, 7 Oct 2007 22:20:20 -0700 From: Robin Lee Powell To: llg-members@lojban.org Subject: [llg-members] Re: LLG AGM 2007: Officer's Reports - Treasurer's Report Message-ID: <20071008052020.GI3815@digitalkingdom.org> Mail-Followup-To: llg-members@lojban.org References: <20070918181955.GW10667@nvg.org> <20071007025639.GD20839@digitalkingdom.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20071007025639.GD20839@digitalkingdom.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-11) X-archive-position: 346 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: llg-members-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: llg-members-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Precedence: bulk Reply-to: llg-members@lojban.org X-list: llg-members On Sat, Oct 06, 2007 at 07:56:39PM -0700, Robin Lee Powell wrote: > On Tue, Sep 18, 2007 at 08:19:55PM +0200, Arnt Richard Johansen > wrote: > > 3. Officer's Reports > > I hereby call for officer's reports to be presented immediately; I > will be posting the last quarter's treasury report sometime in the > next day or two, when I've done the bookkeeping. Treasurer's Report As of the end of August, the bank account balanced at $5,467.11, and the PayPal account balanced at $209.26. Having said that, I've agreed to cut Bob a cheque for all but $100 of his remaining balance: after that clears, the bank balance will be (approximately) $3,400. All book orders that I'm aware of have been filled. Bob has improved in both turn around time and responsiveness in the last 6 months. Bob has asked for a bit of an account of CLL orders over the last few years, so here we go: 2007, so far: 20 2006: 30 2005: 27 2004: 16 After that my records don't work anymore; the 2004 number is in fact a bit suspect, but only a bit. I'm actually surprised by the 2007 number; I thought it was higher. -Robin -- http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ *** http://www.lojban.org/ Lojban Reason #17: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buffalo_buffalo Proud Supporter of the Singularity Institute - http://singinst.org/