From rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Tue Oct 16 12:39:34 2007 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list llg-members); Tue, 16 Oct 2007 12:39:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rlpowell by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1IhsGL-0004H6-H3 for llg-members@lojban.org; Tue, 16 Oct 2007 12:39:33 -0700 Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 12:39:33 -0700 From: Robin Lee Powell To: llg-members@lojban.org Subject: [llg-members] Re: LLG AGM 2007: New Business Message-ID: <20071016193933.GJ5630@digitalkingdom.org> Mail-Followup-To: llg-members@lojban.org References: <470E9480.3000307@lojban.org> <20071012022955.GG13890@digitalkingdom.org> <470F688A.2050209@lojban.org> <20071012172307.GD31644@digitalkingdom.org> <470FD7BB.2030202@lojban.org> <925d17560710121543u7022f8d2n56d06f14ac6f8e7d@mail.gmail.com> <471099AA.4070805@gmail.com> <20071013235327.GR31644@digitalkingdom.org> <47123DF7.9070802@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <47123DF7.9070802@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-11) X-archive-position: 430 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: llg-members-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: llg-members-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Precedence: bulk Reply-to: llg-members@lojban.org X-list: llg-members On Sun, Oct 14, 2007 at 05:04:07PM +0100, And Rosta wrote: > Seriously, about the only way to ensure that the BPFK completes is > to have some sort of principle that abolishes those bits of the > language that none of the BPFK could be arsed to document. Whereas I would have said that it's for people to *get* arsed and get to work. If ~80% of the language isn't worth documenting (as is the current state), then why speak it at all? -Robin -- Lojban Reason #17: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buffalo_buffalo Proud Supporter of the Singularity Institute - http://singinst.org/ http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ *** http://www.lojban.org/