From cowan@ccil.org Tue Oct 16 14:46:11 2007 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list llg-members); Tue, 16 Oct 2007 14:46:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from earth.ccil.org ([192.190.237.11]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1IhuEr-0000Dk-56 for llg-members@lojban.org; Tue, 16 Oct 2007 14:46:10 -0700 Received: from cowan by earth.ccil.org with local (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1IhuEp-0000pJ-NL for llg-members@lojban.org; Tue, 16 Oct 2007 17:46:07 -0400 Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 17:46:07 -0400 To: llg-members@lojban.org Subject: [llg-members] Re: LLG AGM 2007: New Business Message-ID: <20071016214607.GH28745@mercury.ccil.org> References: <20070918181955.GW10667@nvg.org> <20071010000942.GZ10376@digitalkingdom.org> <20071011190654.GO13890@digitalkingdom.org> <20071013110233.GU1196@nvg.org> <20071016193843.GI5630@digitalkingdom.org> <20071016194330.GF28745@mercury.ccil.org> <20071016202338.GL5630@digitalkingdom.org> <20071016213405.GG28745@mercury.ccil.org> <20071016213807.GO5630@digitalkingdom.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20071016213807.GO5630@digitalkingdom.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) From: John Cowan X-Spam-Score: 0.0 X-Spam-Score-Int: 0 X-Spam-Bar: / X-archive-position: 437 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: llg-members-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: llg-members-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: cowan@ccil.org Precedence: bulk Reply-to: llg-members@lojban.org X-list: llg-members Blunderingly I wrote: > > Hmm, let me clarify. Saying "Use xorlo" is good. Saying "Ignore > > CLL-conformant" is good. Saying "CLL text is no longer valid > > Lojban" is bad. I don't think anyone's doing that. That should have been: > > Hmm, let me clarify. Saying "Use xorlo" is good. Saying "Ignore > > CLL" is good. Saying "CLL-conformant text is no longer valid > > Lojban" is bad. I don't think anyone's doing that. > > I don't know if that counts "CLL text is no longer valid Lojban", > but "ignore those" is pretty close. You can't reject older text that conforms to CLL, was what I meant. -- There is no real going back. Though I John Cowan may come to the Shire, it will not seem cowan@ccil.org the same; for I shall not be the same. http://www.ccil.org/~cowan I am wounded with knife, sting, and tooth, and a long burden. Where shall I find rest? --Frodo