From rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Thu Nov 01 11:55:52 2007 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list llg-members); Thu, 01 Nov 2007 11:55:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rlpowell by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1InfCp-00027j-Rk for llg-members@lojban.org; Thu, 01 Nov 2007 11:55:52 -0700 Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2007 11:55:51 -0700 From: Robin Lee Powell To: llg-members@lojban.org Subject: [llg-members] Re: LLG AGM 2007: New Business. Motions that are on the table Message-ID: <20071101185551.GO27850@digitalkingdom.org> Mail-Followup-To: llg-members@lojban.org References: <20070918181955.GW10667@nvg.org> <20071010000942.GZ10376@digitalkingdom.org> <20071011190654.GO13890@digitalkingdom.org> <20071018203153.GB1196@nvg.org> <20071020173535.GD1196@nvg.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20071020173535.GD1196@nvg.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-11) X-archive-position: 506 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: llg-members-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: llg-members-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Precedence: bulk Reply-to: llg-members@lojban.org X-list: llg-members If there are no objections, I withdraw my motion below. I also call upon Bob to withdraw his. (Explaining the procedural details: once proposed and seconded, motions become the property of the assembly. As such, any objection means no withdrawal, and we get to vote anyways, and such.) -Robin On Sat, Oct 20, 2007 at 07:35:35PM +0200, Arnt Richard Johansen wrote: > 2) The membership recognizes xorlo. Specifically, the membership > assert that xorlo is more correct than the CLL at this > time. Whatever the BPFK comes up with, xorlo will be part of it. > New Lojbanists should be taught it as soon as possible. > > Proposed by: Robin Lee Powell > Seconded by: Theodore Reed > > 3) It is the sense of the LLG membership that xorlo should be adopted > by the byfy, and it is the sense of the membership that the > self-consistent use of either xorlo or the CLL standard by members > of the community, pending a final decision by the byfy, should not > be considered incorrect and subject to correction". > > Proposed by: Bob LeChevalier > Seconded by: Robin Lee Powell -- Lojban Reason #17: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buffalo_buffalo Proud Supporter of the Singularity Institute - http://singinst.org/ http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ *** http://www.lojban.org/