From lojbab@lojban.org Tue Nov 20 08:28:20 2007 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list llg-members); Tue, 20 Nov 2007 08:28:20 -0800 (PST) Received: from eastrmmtao103.cox.net ([68.230.240.9]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1IuVxS-0000hm-Cz for llg-members@lojban.org; Tue, 20 Nov 2007 08:28:20 -0800 Received: from eastrmimpo03.cox.net ([68.1.16.126]) by eastrmmtao103.cox.net (InterMail vM.7.08.02.01 201-2186-121-102-20070209) with ESMTP id <20071120162808.LIHA16684.eastrmmtao103.cox.net@eastrmimpo03.cox.net> for ; Tue, 20 Nov 2007 11:28:08 -0500 Received: from [192.168.1.100] ([72.192.234.183]) by eastrmimpo03.cox.net with bizsmtp id F4RY1Y0093y5FKc0000000; Tue, 20 Nov 2007 11:25:32 -0500 Message-ID: <47430B18.9030807@lojban.org> Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2007 11:28:08 -0500 From: Bob LeChevalier User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (Windows/20050923) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: llg-members@lojban.org Subject: [llg-members] Re: Motion fails (was Re: PLEASE VOTE! -- LLG AGM 2007: Bylaw Alterations) References: <20070918181955.GW10667@nvg.org> <20071007030525.GF20839@digitalkingdom.org> <20071114172810.GI13652@digitalkingdom.org> <20071120082554.GH17046@digitalkingdom.org> In-Reply-To: <20071120082554.GH17046@digitalkingdom.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: 0.0 X-Spam-Score-Int: 0 X-Spam-Bar: / X-archive-position: 561 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: llg-members-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: llg-members-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: lojbab@lojban.org Precedence: bulk Reply-to: llg-members@lojban.org X-list: llg-members Robin Lee Powell wrote: > I count 26 members, which means we need 17 1/3 votes for passage, > which means 18. > > I count 17 Yes votes, and 0 No votes. > > The motion fails. > > Perhaps now you all will fight with me less when I get aggressive > about removing non-participating members? There were no motions this year attempting non-participating members, and indeed there was no mention of who has not participated. Since there is no roll-call at these meetings, it is a little difficult to determine who is a member. The current list of members on the tiki page does list 26 members, but that list includes Gary Burgess who resigned early in the meeting. So, if the motion is ruled to fail, I call a point of information to identify those you think are members that did not vote. (Even if it passes because of the deletion of Gary, I would still like to know). lojbab