From lojbab@lojban.org Wed Oct 29 12:10:38 2008 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list llg-members); Wed, 29 Oct 2008 12:10:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from eastrmmtao104.cox.net ([68.230.240.46]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1KvGR8-0008KE-1F for llg-members@lojban.org; Wed, 29 Oct 2008 12:10:38 -0700 Received: from eastrmimpo03.cox.net ([68.1.16.126]) by eastrmmtao104.cox.net (InterMail vM.7.08.02.01 201-2186-121-102-20070209) with ESMTP id <20081029191023.VOIX2096.eastrmmtao104.cox.net@eastrmimpo03.cox.net> for ; Wed, 29 Oct 2008 15:10:23 -0400 Received: from [192.168.1.100] ([70.187.235.94]) by eastrmimpo03.cox.net with bizsmtp id YjAN1a00L22sj6m02jANGb; Wed, 29 Oct 2008 15:10:22 -0400 X-Authority-Analysis: v=1.0 c=1 a=hLwvwXy8EEkA:10 a=9r6ZqammQC4A:10 a=MgriYW_04JHAYrgnByYA:9 a=_hW-jX2UqonP6vDYi34A:7 a=meGw8Ym9MY-_ICewQe7NXQjV7sIA:4 a=pt045V2O6wwA:10 X-CM-Score: 0.00 Message-ID: <4908B49F.4080009@lojban.org> Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 15:08:15 -0400 From: Bob LeChevalier User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (Windows/20050923) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: llg-members@lojban.org Subject: [llg-members] Re: LLG AGM 2008: Election of New Members References: <20081008210111.GX2447@nvg.org> <20081029183251.GW2447@nvg.org> In-Reply-To: <20081029183251.GW2447@nvg.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: 0.0 X-Spam-Score-Int: 0 X-Spam-Bar: / X-archive-position: 602 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: llg-members-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: llg-members-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: lojbab@lojban.org Precedence: bulk Reply-to: llg-members@lojban.org X-list: llg-members Arnt Richard Johansen wrote: >>6. Election of New Members > > > If you would like to nominate someone to be a member of the LLG, please do so now. > > To avoid confusion, I would like to repeat Robin's statement from last year: > >>Please recall that the LLG is a business organization, and is only >>tangentially in the business of running the Lojban language. The >>BPFK is in charge of the actual Lojban parts, and you need not be a >>member of the LLG to contribute to the BPFK. If it is in order, I move that it be the normal practice NOT to propose or accept for membership any person who has not been asked *in advance of the meeting*, with the exception of someone who is actively participating in some organizational capacity of LLG (organizational being defined in contrast to the "actual language parts" as per the statement above). I would like a statement to this effect added to the agenda/announcement corresponding to Arnt's message above in all future years. If this is not in order at this point, please relocate this motion to the appropriate section. Robert LeChevalier (lojbab)