From rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Wed Oct 29 16:03:05 2008 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list llg-members); Wed, 29 Oct 2008 16:03:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rlpowell by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1KvK49-0003R7-3n for llg-members@lojban.org; Wed, 29 Oct 2008 16:03:05 -0700 Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 16:03:05 -0700 From: Robin Lee Powell To: llg-members@lojban.org Subject: [llg-members] Re: LLG AGM 2008: Removal of Old Members Message-ID: <20081029230305.GC1092@digitalkingdom.org> Mail-Followup-To: llg-members@lojban.org References: <20081008210111.GX2447@nvg.org> <20081029183722.GX2447@nvg.org> <20081029184633.GJ26657@digitalkingdom.org> <4908B722.2010303@lojban.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4908B722.2010303@lojban.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-archive-position: 611 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: llg-members-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: llg-members-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Precedence: bulk Reply-to: llg-members@lojban.org X-list: llg-members On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 03:18:58PM -0400, Bob LeChevalier wrote: > Robin Lee Powell wrote: >> On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 07:37:22PM +0100, Arnt Richard Johansen wrote: >> >>>> 6. Election of New Members >>> >>> If you would like to step down, or propose that someone be removed from the LLG, please do so now. >> >> >> I propose the removal of all of the following for inactivity: >> >> * Desquilbet, Jerome >> * Dyke, Gregory >> * Hodges, John B. >> * Le Du, Yann >> * Nicholas, Nick >> * O'Sullivan, Paul Francis >> * Speer, Rob >> * Turner, Robin >> >> Having said that, I expect one or two of them to show up and be >> active (I was really surprised, in particular, to not see Robin.TR >> last year). > > I will let my counter-motion serve as my main comment on some of > these. > > I am presming that none of these have bouncing addresses. > > Ideally, someone would attempt to email each of these off-list in > case they have an autofilter that they've forgotten about, before > we give up on them. I did that last year. If someone else wants to do it this year, great; I'm far too busy. -Robin -- They say: "The first AIs will be built by the military as weapons." And I'm thinking: "Does it even occur to you to try for something other than the default outcome?" -- http://shorl.com/tydruhedufogre http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ *** http://www.lojban.org/