From rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Mon Nov 03 10:34:04 2008 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list llg-members); Mon, 03 Nov 2008 10:34:05 -0800 (PST) Received: from rlpowell by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Kx4FY-0004No-PT for llg-members@lojban.org; Mon, 03 Nov 2008 10:34:04 -0800 Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2008 10:34:04 -0800 From: Robin Lee Powell To: llg-members@lojban.org Subject: [llg-members] Re: LLG AGM 2008: New business: membership alert proposal Message-ID: <20081103183404.GE20021@digitalkingdom.org> Mail-Followup-To: llg-members@lojban.org References: <20081008210111.GX2447@nvg.org> <20081029183251.GW2447@nvg.org> <4908B49F.4080009@lojban.org> <20081029230222.GB1092@digitalkingdom.org> <4908F37A.2040504@lojban.org> <20081030193909.GG2447@nvg.org> <490A1AEF.7030106@lojban.org> <20081103174637.GJ2447@nvg.org> <55b258c20811031005x7ba80e47nc7d1961d663552af@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <55b258c20811031005x7ba80e47nc7d1961d663552af@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-archive-position: 640 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: llg-members-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: llg-members-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Precedence: bulk Reply-to: llg-members@lojban.org X-list: llg-members On Mon, Nov 03, 2008 at 01:05:05PM -0500, Craig Daniel wrote: > On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 12:46 PM, Arnt Richard Johansen > wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 04:37:03PM -0400, Bob LeChevalier wrote: > >> Arnt Richard Johansen wrote: > >> >Correct me if I'm wrong: > >> > > >> >You're moving that: > >> >* A statement like the above, plus the requirement that people be asked in > >> >advance, should hereafter be posted in every AGM agenda > >> >* Proposed members should be added to the llg-members mailing list prior > >> >to the meeting on which they are proposed as members > >> > >> Yes. > > > > Okay. The above has been moved. Do we have a second? > > Yes. I second this motion. I would like to see the actual wording of the "statement like the above plus" before we vote. -Robin -- They say: "The first AIs will be built by the military as weapons." And I'm thinking: "Does it even occur to you to try for something other than the default outcome?" -- http://shorl.com/tydruhedufogre http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ *** http://www.lojban.org/