From arj@nvg.ntnu.no Tue Nov 04 10:53:04 2008 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list llg-members); Tue, 04 Nov 2008 10:53:04 -0800 (PST) Received: from sabre-wulf.nvg.ntnu.no ([129.241.210.67]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1KxR1Q-0003pr-3d for llg-members@lojban.org; Tue, 04 Nov 2008 10:53:04 -0800 Received: from hagbart.nvg.ntnu.no (hagbart.nvg.ntnu.no [129.241.210.68]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by sabre-wulf.nvg.ntnu.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2288947B2 for ; Tue, 4 Nov 2008 19:52:42 +0100 (CET) Received: from hagbart.nvg.ntnu.no (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by hagbart.nvg.ntnu.no (8.13.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id mA4Iqg1I013058 for ; Tue, 4 Nov 2008 19:52:42 +0100 Received: (from arj@localhost) by hagbart.nvg.ntnu.no (8.13.8/8.13.1/Submit) id mA4Iqf6H013057 for llg-members@lojban.org; Tue, 4 Nov 2008 19:52:41 +0100 Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2008 19:52:41 +0100 From: Arnt Richard Johansen To: llg-members@lojban.org Subject: [llg-members] Re: LLG AGM 2008: Removal of Old Members Message-ID: <20081104185241.GS2447@nvg.org> References: <20081008210111.GX2447@nvg.org> <20081029183722.GX2447@nvg.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20081029183722.GX2447@nvg.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-NVG-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-NVG-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-MailScanner-From: arj@nvg.ntnu.no X-Spam-Score: -0.0 X-Spam-Score-Int: 0 X-Spam-Bar: / X-archive-position: 649 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: llg-members-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: llg-members-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: arj@nvg.org Precedence: bulk Reply-to: llg-members@lojban.org X-list: llg-members On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 07:37:22PM +0100, Arnt Richard Johansen wrote: > > 6. Election of New Members > > If you would like to step down, or propose that someone be removed from the LLG, please do so now. As I see it, we have two motions on the table. First we have Robin's proposal, removing everyone that did not participate last year: * Dyke, Gregory * Hodges, John B. * Le Du, Yann * Nicholas, Nick * O'Sullivan, Paul Francis * Speer, Rob * Turner, Robin Second, we have Bob's counter-proposal, removing everyone that did not participate the previous *two* years, except Nick Nicholas: * Dyke, Gregory * Speer, Rob (Since Jerome resigned, I have removed him from both lists) We'll take Bob's proposal, which is least radical, first. If you do NOT want to remove Greg Dyke and Rob Speer, please speak up ASAP and within 72 hours (3 days). Otherwise, it will pass by general consent. (If this passes, we will proceed to Robin's proposal.) Also, please speak up if you disagree with the procedure. -- Arnt Richard Johansen Vice President, LLG