From lojbab@lojban.org Sun Nov 09 09:30:50 2008 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list llg-members); Sun, 09 Nov 2008 09:30:50 -0800 (PST) Received: from eastrmmtao105.cox.net ([68.230.240.47]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1KzE7b-0000sd-Dx for llg-members@lojban.org; Sun, 09 Nov 2008 09:30:50 -0800 Received: from eastrmimpo03.cox.net ([68.1.16.126]) by eastrmmtao105.cox.net (InterMail vM.7.08.02.01 201-2186-121-102-20070209) with ESMTP id <20081109173041.RSIN23768.eastrmmtao105.cox.net@eastrmimpo03.cox.net> for ; Sun, 9 Nov 2008 12:30:41 -0500 Received: from [192.168.1.100] ([70.187.235.94]) by eastrmimpo03.cox.net with bizsmtp id d5VX1a00622sj6m025VXvF; Sun, 09 Nov 2008 12:30:40 -0500 X-Authority-Analysis: v=1.0 c=1 a=nI9EPAmbpmYA:10 a=pLsZmdU2mTEA:10 a=hRxQgUX_arGWqRSnuZsA:9 a=cBLfQldAu6Cx7k3c8CIA:7 a=piAwA8nIUw4gTS6dtaTohrwB7IUA:4 a=pt045V2O6wwA:10 X-CM-Score: 0.00 Message-ID: <49171E3F.9030708@lojban.org> Date: Sun, 09 Nov 2008 12:30:39 -0500 From: Bob LeChevalier User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (Windows/20050923) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: llg-members@lojban.org Subject: [llg-members] Re: LLG AGM 2008: PLEASE VOTE: Removal of Old Members References: <20081008210111.GX2447@nvg.org> <20081029183722.GX2447@nvg.org> <20081104185241.GS2447@nvg.org> <20081107202640.GD2447@nvg.org> <20081109131654.GE2447@nvg.org> In-Reply-To: <20081109131654.GE2447@nvg.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: 0.0 X-Spam-Score-Int: 0 X-Spam-Bar: / X-archive-position: 674 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: llg-members-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: llg-members-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: lojbab@lojban.org Precedence: bulk Reply-to: llg-members@lojban.org X-list: llg-members Arnt Richard Johansen wrote: > On Fri, Nov 07, 2008 at 09:26:40PM +0100, Arnt Richard Johansen wrote: > >>On Tue, Nov 04, 2008 at 07:52:41PM +0100, Arnt Richard Johansen wrote: >> >>>We'll take Bob's proposal, which is least radical, first. >>> >>>If you do NOT want to remove Greg Dyke and Rob Speer, please speak up ASAP and within 72 hours (3 days). Otherwise, it will pass by general consent. >> >>By general consent, the proposal PASSES, and Greg Dyke and Rob Speer are removed. >> >>Now on to the controversial part. Robin proposed that the following members, who did not participate either last year or this year, should be removed: >> >>* Hodges, John B. >>* Le Du, Yann >>* Nicholas, Nick >>* O'Sullivan, Paul Francis >>* Turner, Robin >> >>Please vote by replying to this message on-list. > > > The 7 of you who haven't voted, if you have an opinion, please cast your vote before Tuesday. Bob LeChevalier abstains. I see both sides, but am very reluctant to vote out people who have rendered many years of service without more effort (this applies to John Hodges, Nick, and Robin). On the other hand, I realize that they can be readded at any meeting if they show interest, so I won't vote no on their removal. lojbab