From mark@kli.org Tue Nov 11 06:09:23 2008 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list llg-members); Tue, 11 Nov 2008 06:09:23 -0800 (PST) Received: from pi.meson.org ([66.134.26.207]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Kztvh-00069F-UJ for llg-members@lojban.org; Tue, 11 Nov 2008 06:09:23 -0800 Received: (qmail 16900 invoked from network); 11 Nov 2008 09:09:11 -0500 Received: from nagas.meson.org (HELO ?192.168.1.101?) (1000@192.168.1.101) by pi.meson.org with SMTP; 11 Nov 2008 09:09:11 -0500 Message-ID: <49199207.4030105@kli.org> Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 09:09:11 -0500 From: "Mark E. Shoulson" User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (X11/20080914) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: llg-members@lojban.org Subject: [llg-members] Re: LLG AGM 2008: PLEASE VOTE: Removal of Old Members References: <20081008210111.GX2447@nvg.org> <20081029183722.GX2447@nvg.org> <20081104185241.GS2447@nvg.org> <20081107202640.GD2447@nvg.org> <20081109131654.GE2447@nvg.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: -0.0 X-Spam-Score-Int: 0 X-Spam-Bar: / X-archive-position: 682 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: llg-members-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: llg-members-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: mark@kli.org Precedence: bulk Reply-to: llg-members@lojban.org X-list: llg-members On Tue, Nov 04, 2008 at 07:52:41PM +0100, Arnt Richard Johansen wrote: >>>> We'll take Bob's proposal, which is least radical, first. >>>> >>>> If you do NOT want to remove Greg Dyke and Rob Speer, please speak up ASAP and within 72 hours (3 days). Otherwise, it will pass by general consent. >>>> >>> By general consent, the proposal PASSES, and Greg Dyke and Rob Speer are removed. >>> >>> Now on to the controversial part. Robin proposed that the following members, who did not participate either last year or this year, should be removed: >>> >>> * Hodges, John B. >>> * Le Du, Yann >>> * Nicholas, Nick >>> * O'Sullivan, Paul Francis >>> * Turner, Robin >>> >>> Please vote by replying to this message on-list. I vote yes, with reluctance. But John Cowan's points are persuasive. ~mark