From arj@nvg.ntnu.no Sat Aug 22 04:56:38 2009 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list llg-members); Sat, 22 Aug 2009 04:56:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sabre-wulf.nvg.ntnu.no ([129.241.210.67]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1MepD0-00023w-21 for llg-members@lojban.org; Sat, 22 Aug 2009 04:56:37 -0700 Received: from hagbart.nvg.ntnu.no (unknown [IPv6:2001:700:300:2000:2a0:c9ff:feab:76e2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by sabre-wulf.nvg.ntnu.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8645F94787 for ; Sat, 22 Aug 2009 13:55:58 +0200 (CEST) Received: from hagbart.nvg.ntnu.no (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by hagbart.nvg.ntnu.no (8.13.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id n7MBtwBg000379 for ; Sat, 22 Aug 2009 13:55:58 +0200 Received: (from arj@localhost) by hagbart.nvg.ntnu.no (8.13.8/8.13.1/Submit) id n7MBtvOf000378 for llg-members@lojban.org; Sat, 22 Aug 2009 13:55:57 +0200 Date: Sat, 22 Aug 2009 13:55:57 +0200 From: Arnt Richard Johansen To: llg-members@lojban.org Subject: [llg-members] Re: LLG AGM 2009: Election of the Board Message-ID: <20090822115557.GD5073@nvg.org> References: <20090628201339.GG23324@nvg.org> <20090808123929.GQ2912@nvg.org> <20090814143122.GZ2912@nvg.org> <20090814153309.GA2912@nvg.org> <53391.75.75.38.246.1250284405.squirrel@www.patriot.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <53391.75.75.38.246.1250284405.squirrel@www.patriot.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-NVG-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-NVG-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-MailScanner-From: arj@nvg.ntnu.no X-archive-position: 733 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: llg-members-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: llg-members-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: arj@nvg.org Precedence: bulk Reply-to: llg-members@lojban.org X-list: llg-members On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 05:13:25PM -0400, dlb@patriot.net wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 11:08:20AM -0400, Matt Arnold wrote: > >> Refresh my memory, please. Does everyone need to be re-nominated, or > >> would inaction leave the same board in place? > > > > If you want to have the current slate of directors re-elected, you can > > nominate them. There is no default course of action here. > > I have seen the following messages as well; however, I don't want to let > one thing slip by under the rubric of "default". > > I therefore ask unanimous consent to a heartfelt expression of thanks to > the current board of directors, and to their re-election by acclamation. MOVED: * To re-elect the current Board of Directors: * Robin Lee Powell * Robert LeChevalier * Matt Arnold * Arnt Richard Johansen * To give a heartfelt expression of thanks to the current Board of Directors. PASSED, as amended. -- Arnt Richard Johansen Vice President, LLG