From arj@nvg.ntnu.no Sun Aug 23 09:08:00 2009 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list llg-members); Sun, 23 Aug 2009 09:08:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sabre-wulf.nvg.ntnu.no ([129.241.210.67]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1MfFbo-0006vJ-LZ for llg-members@lojban.org; Sun, 23 Aug 2009 09:08:00 -0700 Received: from hagbart.nvg.ntnu.no (unknown [IPv6:2001:700:300:2000:2a0:c9ff:feab:76e2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by sabre-wulf.nvg.ntnu.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FB5194789 for ; Sun, 23 Aug 2009 18:07:34 +0200 (CEST) Received: from hagbart.nvg.ntnu.no (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by hagbart.nvg.ntnu.no (8.13.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id n7NG7YAp004166 for ; Sun, 23 Aug 2009 18:07:34 +0200 Received: (from arj@localhost) by hagbart.nvg.ntnu.no (8.13.8/8.13.1/Submit) id n7NG7Xu1004165 for llg-members@lojban.org; Sun, 23 Aug 2009 18:07:33 +0200 Date: Sun, 23 Aug 2009 18:07:33 +0200 From: Arnt Richard Johansen To: llg-members@lojban.org Subject: [llg-members] LLG AGM 2009: Point of order Message-ID: <20090823160733.GH5073@nvg.org> References: <20090628201339.GG23324@nvg.org> <20090808123929.GQ2912@nvg.org> <20090814143122.GZ2912@nvg.org> <20090814153309.GA2912@nvg.org> <53391.75.75.38.246.1250284405.squirrel@www.patriot.net> <20090822115557.GD5073@nvg.org> <4A912D5F.7090405@lojban.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4A912D5F.7090405@lojban.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-NVG-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-NVG-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-MailScanner-From: arj@nvg.ntnu.no X-archive-position: 738 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: llg-members-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: llg-members-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: arj@nvg.org Precedence: bulk Reply-to: llg-members@lojban.org X-list: llg-members On Sun, Aug 23, 2009 at 07:51:59AM -0400, Bob LeChevalier wrote: > Arnt Richard Johansen wrote: > >MOVED: > >* To re-elect the current Board of Directors: > > * Robin Lee Powell > > * Robert LeChevalier > > * Matt Arnold > > * Arnt Richard Johansen > > > >* To give a heartfelt expression of thanks to the current Board of > >Directors. > > > >PASSED, as amended. > > Point of order. > > The Bylaws specify an agenda order, one that was taken sufficiently > seriously that in prior years, we went to great lengths to amend it to > put election of new members ahead of the Board election. We should > follow that agenda. The AGM has been processing the agenda items concurrently for at least the past three years. It seems to have worked well in the past. Why do you now think that this is a problem? > The Board election cannot take place (or at least in the informality of > the current on-line meetings, cannot be concluded), until after the > prior agenda items have taken place. Why? > It hasn't even clearly been > decided whether the one new proposed member has been officially accepted. Did you not get my e-mail yesterday? From: Arnt Richard Johansen Subject: [llg-members] Re: [cr@cosmicray.co.uk: [Fwd: Lojban Ideas]] To: llg-members@lojban.org Reply-to: llg-members@lojban.org Date: Sat, 22 Aug 2009 13:58:31 +0200 > I note specifically that NOT ONE OFFICER has made a report to the > membership (and Robin begged off doing so temporarily due to lack of > time). So, especially in light of the "amendment" to give thanks to the > Board, it kinda would be nice if that Board reported to the membership > just what it is that the membership should be thankful for. I agree. I am still awaiting the President's report, the Secretary/Treasurer's report, and the BPFK committee report. > If there is any dispute on this, I ask the opinion of the parliamentarian. As do I. -- Arnt Richard Johansen Vice-President, LLG