From arj@nvg.ntnu.no Thu Aug 27 13:21:49 2009 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list llg-members); Thu, 27 Aug 2009 13:21:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sabre-wulf.nvg.ntnu.no ([129.241.210.67]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1MglTc-0003Pq-OB for llg-members@lojban.org; Thu, 27 Aug 2009 13:21:49 -0700 Received: from hagbart.nvg.ntnu.no (unknown [IPv6:2001:700:300:2000:2a0:c9ff:feab:76e2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by sabre-wulf.nvg.ntnu.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CC2E94796 for ; Thu, 27 Aug 2009 22:20:49 +0200 (CEST) Received: from hagbart.nvg.ntnu.no (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by hagbart.nvg.ntnu.no (8.13.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id n7RKKlhh000735 for ; Thu, 27 Aug 2009 22:20:47 +0200 Received: (from arj@localhost) by hagbart.nvg.ntnu.no (8.13.8/8.13.1/Submit) id n7RKKh32000734 for llg-members@lojban.org; Thu, 27 Aug 2009 22:20:43 +0200 Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2009 22:20:43 +0200 From: Arnt Richard Johansen To: llg-members@lojban.org Subject: [llg-members] Re: Motion: Lojban Certification Program Message-ID: <20090827202043.GY5073@nvg.org> References: <925d17560908261436r7364022dn735a98e5851cc7f9@mail.gmail.com> <200908270711.14068.phma@phma.optus.nu> <4A96BCF9.1020305@kli.org> <20090827174942.GC27939@mercury.ccil.org> <4A96CC11.2030309@kli.org> <20090827181416.GD27939@mercury.ccil.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090827181416.GD27939@mercury.ccil.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-NVG-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-NVG-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-MailScanner-From: arj@nvg.ntnu.no X-archive-position: 777 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: llg-members-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: llg-members-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: arj@nvg.org Precedence: bulk Reply-to: llg-members@lojban.org X-list: llg-members On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 02:14:16PM -0400, John Cowan wrote: > Mark E. Shoulson scripsit: > > In the interests of moving this off to side-discussions where it > > belongs, I move that Lojban Certification Program motion as proposed by > > Matt be tabled, and instead that a committee be formed to work out the > > details of the certification program. This isn't something that needs to > > be hacked out in a plenary discussion, I think. > > I take that to be a motion to refer the question to an ad hoc committee. Agreed. Such motions require a second. Do we have one? -- Arnt Richard Johansen Vice President, LLG