From matt.mattarn@gmail.com Fri Aug 28 09:17:29 2009 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list llg-members); Fri, 28 Aug 2009 09:17:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-gx0-f219.google.com ([209.85.217.219]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Mh48k-00083w-5h for llg-members@lojban.org; Fri, 28 Aug 2009 09:17:28 -0700 Received: by gxk19 with SMTP id 19so2556927gxk.0 for ; Fri, 28 Aug 2009 09:17:20 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=3q6GzzQDkW7MJdyAEnUdkNH1Z2ydxqghh/rDNdfII3U=; b=hhReaXXRDsgnLvweK//KemxQovP2h16fjSbFmuKaoAvnAFYpF4F9N8nEclYRNK4/Dr iRko290J5VjMaZePM91IRa48HFXl/TLYPSbEDBiJdtlMu+A1DLkkl+GnXtunSjLzCaPB bDXL6T3YGiMyKyrGRs4mh2D4yTtdCDgnZfKJQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=VoyUKIvN5WQRiStKnluE1LiwYFQG5J8HBKhqSWMz7Vtf4eD/thEJ5wq0Qof4UTmIS8 DB3vlFxRzXdSUsX22cDyR7YdDJEob9deVAAooc9ftoQ5Wmihc33eheP11c6DPzL74rPY vKrTTpm1UXh437geIgsxydDCkWhrPkJiJl8m0= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.150.8.14 with SMTP id 14mr2525411ybh.52.1251476240126; Fri, 28 Aug 2009 09:17:20 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <200908280931.13589.phma@phma.optus.nu> References: <20090827174942.GC27939@mercury.ccil.org> <4A96CC11.2030309@kli.org> <200908280931.13589.phma@phma.optus.nu> Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2009 12:17:20 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: [llg-members] Re: Motion: Lojban Certification Program From: Matt Arnold To: llg-members@lojban.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-archive-position: 782 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: llg-members-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: llg-members-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: matt.mattarn@gmail.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: llg-members@lojban.org X-list: llg-members OK, Pierre, sounds good. Hey Robin, would you set up lbck@lojban.org for us? -Matt On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 9:31 AM, Pierre Abbat wrote: > On Thursday 27 August 2009 14:10:25 Mark E. Shoulson wrote: >> In the interests of moving this off to side-discussions where it >> belongs, I move that Lojban Certification Program motion as proposed by >> Matt be tabled, and instead that a committee be formed to work out the >> details of the certification program. This isn't something that needs to >> be hacked out in a plenary discussion, I think. >> >> I volunteer to be on said committee. > > I would also like to be on the committee. > > Pierre > > >