From mark@kli.org Fri Aug 28 11:07:14 2009 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list llg-members); Fri, 28 Aug 2009 11:07:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pi.meson.org ([66.134.26.207]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Mh5qw-0002xk-Aw for llg-members@lojban.org; Fri, 28 Aug 2009 11:07:14 -0700 Received: (qmail 26957 invoked from network); 28 Aug 2009 14:07:03 -0400 Received: from nagas.meson.org (192.168.1.101) by pi.meson.org with SMTP; 28 Aug 2009 14:07:03 -0400 Message-ID: <4A981CC7.7010503@kli.org> Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2009 14:07:03 -0400 From: "Mark E. Shoulson" User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (X11/20090320) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: llg-members@lojban.org Subject: [llg-members] Re: Motion: Committee for a Lojban Certification Program References: <20090827202524.GZ5073@nvg.org> <20090828180245.GB5073@nvg.org> In-Reply-To: <20090828180245.GB5073@nvg.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-archive-position: 785 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: llg-members-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: llg-members-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: mark@kli.org Precedence: bulk Reply-to: llg-members@lojban.org X-list: llg-members Arnt Richard Johansen wrote: > (Top-posting fixed.) > > On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 01:51:45PM -0400, Matt Arnold wrote: > >> On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 4:25 PM, Arnt Richard Johansen wrote: >> >>> On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 04:17:50PM -0400, Matt Arnold wrote: >>> >>>> I move to form the lojbo bangu cipra kamni, or LBCK, comprised of me >>>> and Mark Shoulson and whoever else the two of us appoint, as a >>>> committee empowered by the LLG to create a Lojban Certification >>>> Program, with access to up to $500 of LLG funds to pay for the writing >>>> of the initial tests. >>>> >>> Do I understand it correctly that you want to withdraw your previous motion regarding the Lojban Certification Program? >>> >> Sure. -Matt >> > > Okay. If there are no objections, the previous motion is withdrawn, and the above motion is now on the table. > > Is there a second I will second. And also withdraw my motion about tabling his earlier proposal, if it needs to be withdrawn (since Matt's proposal is a realization of what I was asking for). ~mark