From rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Tue Sep 01 22:01:57 2009 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list llg-members); Tue, 01 Sep 2009 22:01:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rlpowell by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Mihyn-00056G-4T for llg-members@lojban.org; Tue, 01 Sep 2009 22:01:57 -0700 Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2009 22:01:57 -0700 From: Robin Lee Powell To: llg-members@lojban.org Subject: [llg-members] Re: Motion: Lojban Certification Program Message-ID: <20090902050157.GR32444@digitalkingdom.org> Mail-Followup-To: llg-members@lojban.org References: <20090827174942.GC27939@mercury.ccil.org> <4A96CC11.2030309@kli.org> <200908280931.13589.phma@phma.optus.nu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-archive-position: 802 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: llg-members-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: llg-members-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Precedence: bulk Reply-to: llg-members@lojban.org X-list: llg-members As a testing thing, I'm creating a google group for this purpose, as I've been wanting to move the main list there anyways. Access settings, which you might have opinions on: Public - Anyone can read the archives. Anyone can join, but only members can post messages and view the members list. Only managers can create pages and upload files. lbck as such was taken, so it's lojban-lbck ; archives at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban-lbck I invited Pierre, you, and clsn; dunno if that's everybody. Having said all that, lbck@lojban.org *will* work for sending mail to the group. Also, I'm archiving the mails using my usual methods as well. -Robin On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 12:17:20PM -0400, Matt Arnold wrote: > OK, Pierre, sounds good. > > Hey Robin, would you set up lbck@lojban.org for us? > > -Matt > > On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 9:31 AM, Pierre Abbat wrote: > > On Thursday 27 August 2009 14:10:25 Mark E. Shoulson wrote: > >> In the interests of moving this off to side-discussions where it > >> belongs, I move that Lojban Certification Program motion as proposed by > >> Matt be tabled, and instead that a committee be formed to work out the > >> details of the certification program. This isn't something that needs to > >> be hacked out in a plenary discussion, I think. > >> > >> I volunteer to be on said committee. > > > > I would also like to be on the committee. > > > > Pierre > > > > > > > > -- They say: "The first AIs will be built by the military as weapons." And I'm thinking: "Does it even occur to you to try for something other than the default outcome?" See http://shrunklink.com/cdiz http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ *** http://www.lojban.org/