From arj@nvg.ntnu.no Wed Sep 09 11:54:29 2009 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list llg-members); Wed, 09 Sep 2009 11:54:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sabre-wulf.nvg.ntnu.no ([129.241.210.67]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1MlSJG-0002ql-MD for llg-members@lojban.org; Wed, 09 Sep 2009 11:54:29 -0700 Received: from hagbart.nvg.ntnu.no (unknown [IPv6:2001:700:300:2000:2a0:c9ff:feab:76e2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by sabre-wulf.nvg.ntnu.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B5AA94781 for ; Wed, 9 Sep 2009 20:54:07 +0200 (CEST) Received: from hagbart.nvg.ntnu.no (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by hagbart.nvg.ntnu.no (8.13.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id n89Is7UM016791 for ; Wed, 9 Sep 2009 20:54:07 +0200 Received: (from arj@localhost) by hagbart.nvg.ntnu.no (8.13.8/8.13.1/Submit) id n89Is3vk016790 for llg-members@lojban.org; Wed, 9 Sep 2009 20:54:03 +0200 Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2009 20:54:02 +0200 From: Arnt Richard Johansen To: llg-members@lojban.org Subject: [llg-members] Re: LLG AGM 2009: Election of the Board Message-ID: <20090909185402.GN2685@nvg.org> References: <20090628201339.GG23324@nvg.org> <20090808123929.GQ2912@nvg.org> <20090814143122.GZ2912@nvg.org> <20090814155245.GA18668@mercury.ccil.org> <20090814171518.GB2912@nvg.org> <20090827201718.GX5073@nvg.org> <20090909183346.GL2685@nvg.org> <59147.128.100.5.128.1252521728.squirrel@www.patriot.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <59147.128.100.5.128.1252521728.squirrel@www.patriot.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-NVG-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-NVG-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-MailScanner-From: arj@nvg.ntnu.no X-archive-position: 815 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: llg-members-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: llg-members-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: arj@nvg.org Precedence: bulk Reply-to: llg-members@lojban.org X-list: llg-members On Wed, Sep 09, 2009 at 02:42:08PM -0400, dlb@patriot.net wrote: > > > I looked at the meeting e-mails from 2008, and it looks like we elected > > the Board by general consent. I assume this means that it is okay with you > > that we do it this way this year, to. > > > > So I'm setting a time limit: the above will be elected by general consent > > if there are no objections by Friday at 18 UTC. > > Can I sneak my resolution of thanks to the board from the membership here? > Or does it need a separate motion? No, that is quite okay. We'll tack it on to the main motion as a friendly amendment. -- Arnt Richard Johansen Vice President, LLG