From lojbab@lojban.org Sat Aug 21 10:55:43 2010 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list llg-members); Sat, 21 Aug 2010 10:55:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from eastrmmtao106.cox.net ([68.230.240.48]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1OmsI8-0000Jw-FR for llg-members@lojban.org; Sat, 21 Aug 2010 10:55:43 -0700 Received: from eastrmimpo01.cox.net ([68.1.16.119]) by eastrmmtao106.cox.net (InterMail vM.8.00.01.00 201-2244-105-20090324) with ESMTP id <20100821175536.ENGC24165.eastrmmtao106.cox.net@eastrmimpo01.cox.net> for ; Sat, 21 Aug 2010 13:55:36 -0400 Received: from [192.168.0.101] ([70.179.118.163]) by eastrmimpo01.cox.net with bizsmtp id x5va1e0083Xcbvq025vanE; Sat, 21 Aug 2010 13:55:34 -0400 X-VR-Score: -100.00 X-Authority-Analysis: v=1.1 cv=TceP/QV+tB1xazyC0zfHbyOqM5jj19w+wovI+qpsmak= c=1 sm=1 a=rX4H6l48y_cA:10 a=IkcTkHD0fZMA:10 a=7ls7RdmwX4RvLZNVULbZcg==:17 a=hJpgAsWTPdWOM2Idv5UA:9 a=JnW9_lT07__JyGNmFeJo77VNfrkA:4 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 a=7ls7RdmwX4RvLZNVULbZcg==:117 X-CM-Score: 0.00 Message-ID: <4C70138A.6010006@lojban.org> Date: Sat, 21 Aug 2010 13:57:30 -0400 From: Robert LeChevalier User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (Windows/20050923) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: llg-members@lojban.org Subject: [llg-members] Re: 2010 Annual Meeting - Call to Order References: <4C700CF6.2040806@lojban.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-archive-position: 882 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: llg-members-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: llg-members-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: lojbab@lojban.org Precedence: bulk Reply-to: llg-members@lojban.org X-list: llg-members Theodore Reed wrote: > Didn't we already do this part? No. That was Robin attempting to verify email addresses. There was no meeting at that point, so it couldn't have been actual attendance, though I guess someone could move that anyone who responded then be considered present. The number of people listed in attendance at last year meeting in the not-yet-approved minutes was relatively few (10), and would not have been a quorum. Since the purpose of these meeting is in part to fulfill a legal requirement, I am trying to unambiguously establish the member list, and that we have a quorum present. lojbab