From lojbab@lojban.org Sat Sep 11 17:32:45 2010 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list llg-members); Sat, 11 Sep 2010 17:32:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from eastrmmtao104.cox.net ([68.230.240.46]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1OuaUs-0005Vi-3s for llg-members@lojban.org; Sat, 11 Sep 2010 17:32:45 -0700 Received: from eastrmimpo01.cox.net ([68.1.16.119]) by eastrmmtao104.cox.net (InterMail vM.8.00.01.00 201-2244-105-20090324) with ESMTP id <20100912003236.UZMV16482.eastrmmtao104.cox.net@eastrmimpo01.cox.net> for ; Sat, 11 Sep 2010 20:32:36 -0400 Received: from [192.168.0.101] ([70.179.118.163]) by eastrmimpo01.cox.net with bizsmtp id 5cYb1f00H3Xcbvq02cYbXE; Sat, 11 Sep 2010 20:32:36 -0400 X-VR-Score: 0.00 X-Authority-Analysis: v=1.1 cv=YoWnPN4EEwtYeJt8G7O+1yVFRpK0U+4N2TJUENz+oDE= c=1 sm=1 a=iJoaHZYb8l4A:10 a=8nJEP1OIZ-IA:10 a=7ls7RdmwX4RvLZNVULbZcg==:17 a=8YJikuA2AAAA:8 a=mZvrQSGxxm0RBERlflkA:9 a=JDBRWnWVGb_UhmQqUWoA:7 a=hqaD8PmYq_eZbDv_EoB2fbHqPFwA:4 a=wPNLvfGTeEIA:10 a=dxBpO5_FDU0A:10 a=7ls7RdmwX4RvLZNVULbZcg==:117 X-CM-Score: 0.00 Authentication-Results: cox.net; none Message-ID: <4C8C2009.7060606@lojban.org> Date: Sat, 11 Sep 2010 20:34:17 -0400 From: Bob LeChevalier User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (Windows/20050923) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: llg-members@lojban.org Subject: [llg-members] 201 Annual Meeting - Old Business Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-archive-position: 937 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: llg-members-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: llg-members-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: lojbab@lojban.org Precedence: bulk Reply-to: llg-members@lojban.org X-list: llg-members I am now opening Old Business for discussion The Board election motion remains open for possible objection until Monday night. There are a few possible Old Business topics, but in particular, the Lojban Certification effort needs to be discussed. It was a major topic of discussion at the last meeting, but the two identified leaders of the effort apparently aren't doing so any more (and Matt has explicitly removed himself from said leadership). Pierre briefly spoke up during reports and said that he was working on something, but I am lacking context to really understand what he was saying and where things stand. Bottom line for meeting purposes - Are we still interested in this as an organization? What are the objectives? What is the priority and/or desired timeline to achieve those objectives? Is anyone willing to assume leadership, and ideally to keep the rest of us informed? Other questions can be added to this list. Let's have a little discussion before any motions (if any are needed). -- Bob LeChevalier lojbab@lojban.org www.lojban.org President and Founder, The Logical Language Group, Inc.