From rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Mon Sep 20 22:16:32 2010 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list llg-members); Mon, 20 Sep 2010 22:16:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rlpowell by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1OxvDT-0005ZL-Rx for llg-members@lojban.org; Mon, 20 Sep 2010 22:16:32 -0700 Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2010 22:16:31 -0700 From: Robin Lee Powell To: llg-members@lojban.org Subject: [llg-members] Re: 2010 Annual Meeting - Old Business Message-ID: <20100921051631.GV30871@digitalkingdom.org> Mail-Followup-To: llg-members@lojban.org References: <4C8C2009.7060606@lojban.org> <4C8F787E.9000101@lojban.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4C8F787E.9000101@lojban.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-archive-position: 960 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: llg-members-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: llg-members-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Precedence: bulk Reply-to: llg-members@lojban.org X-list: llg-members On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 09:28:30AM -0400, Bob LeChevalier wrote: > What would members think about returning to the IRC-based annual > meetings we had for a few years, for future meetings? IRC > sessions were intense and sometimes long, often inconvenient in > time for some people outside the US, but there was a lot more > active participation, and a sense that the members were in charge > of the organization. It also allowed non-voting-members of the > community to freely participate without playing with mailing list > membership, which I think is a good thing. Oh boy I'd really rather not a lot. That shit was *harrowing*. -Robin -- http://singinst.org/ : Our last, best hope for a fantastic future. Lojban (http://www.lojban.org/): The language in which "this parrot is dead" is "ti poi spitaki cu morsi", but "this sentence is false" is "na nei". My personal page: http://www.digitalkingdom.org/rlp/