From lojbab@lojban.org Fri Sep 24 05:29:39 2010 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list llg-members); Fri, 24 Sep 2010 05:29:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from eastrmmtao104.cox.net ([68.230.240.46]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Oz7PE-0003Rh-Nm for llg-members@lojban.org; Fri, 24 Sep 2010 05:29:39 -0700 Received: from eastrmimpo01.cox.net ([68.1.16.119]) by eastrmmtao104.cox.net (InterMail vM.8.00.01.00 201-2244-105-20090324) with ESMTP id <20100924122925.BGQR16482.eastrmmtao104.cox.net@eastrmimpo01.cox.net> for ; Fri, 24 Sep 2010 08:29:25 -0400 Received: from [192.168.0.100] ([70.179.118.163]) by eastrmimpo01.cox.net with bizsmtp id AcVQ1f00J3Xcbvq02cVQqx; Fri, 24 Sep 2010 08:29:25 -0400 X-VR-Score: -100.00 X-Authority-Analysis: v=1.1 cv=Ve2E6xT+YqPv90BJPa9Z7cy3eVbY/842O+E6p2NWdSs= c=1 sm=1 a=bgiPEJ_n5i4A:10 a=8nJEP1OIZ-IA:10 a=7ls7RdmwX4RvLZNVULbZcg==:17 a=8YJikuA2AAAA:8 a=zIP6UaY9tOKxnc56g_gA:9 a=bt5K6VSTqzGnvyjhJ-kA:7 a=mKspZQl8OiNTGawz3bPhI5yTVekA:4 a=wPNLvfGTeEIA:10 a=dxBpO5_FDU0A:10 a=7ls7RdmwX4RvLZNVULbZcg==:117 X-CM-Score: 0.00 Authentication-Results: cox.net; none Message-ID: <4C9C9977.7070507@lojban.org> Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2010 08:28:39 -0400 From: Bob LeChevalier User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (Windows/20050923) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: llg-members@lojban.org Subject: [llg-members] Re: 2010 Annual Meeting - Old Business References: <4C8C2009.7060606@lojban.org> <4C8F787E.9000101@lojban.org> <4C97E04A.4030007@lojban.org> <20100922182154.GT30871@digitalkingdom.org> <60013.70.26.86.37.1285194795.squirrel@www.patriot.net> <20100924074607.GZ30871@digitalkingdom.org> In-Reply-To: <20100924074607.GZ30871@digitalkingdom.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam_score: 0.8 X-Spam_score_int: 8 X-Spam_bar: / X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "chain.digitalkingdom.org", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Robin Lee Powell wrote: > We have something of a time limit here, Please clarify. > so I'm going to slightly > usurp the power of the president and say that this is now a motion, > assumed to be by acclimation unless someone objects, and it closes > on the 29th. > > Bob can over-rule me if necessary. [...] Content analysis details: (0.8 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [68.230.240.46 listed in list.X-archive-position: 980 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: llg-members-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: llg-members-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: lojbab@lojban.org Precedence: bulk Reply-to: llg-members@lojban.org X-list: llg-members Robin Lee Powell wrote: > We have something of a time limit here, Please clarify. > so I'm going to slightly > usurp the power of the president and say that this is now a motion, > assumed to be by acclimation unless someone objects, and it closes > on the 29th. > > Bob can over-rule me if necessary. You beat me by a couple of hours %^). I would have used my standard 3 full days plus until midnight UT to make an objection on a motion that appears to be non-controversial, which would have been 2 days earlier. But I am not going to change what you said. Note that Robin accepted my suggestion to change $600 to $599; the motion as quoted by Dave, as quoted by Robin, still has the $600. But I don't think this is a serious problem. -- Bob LeChevalier lojbab@lojban.org www.lojban.org President and Founder, The Logical Language Group, Inc.