Received: from mail-qw0-f61.google.com ([209.85.216.61]:51862) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1RERYa-0007PR-8T; Thu, 13 Oct 2011 13:07:16 -0700 Received: by qadz2 with SMTP id z2sf350221qad.16 for ; Thu, 13 Oct 2011 13:07:01 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:date:from:to:subject:message-id :mail-followup-to:references:mime-version:in-reply-to :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post :list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe :content-type:content-disposition; bh=1c1VCb7QSp2P5LvfmnIp/4/S9jvt74myu7BYyNwD4pE=; b=5zvTsgV3YbUn/ZmLVkV2+MKhgNYBFgfphMyTSWURD3PUli1rhfvn5bCdZrYl/6roJX g/gD/Mx7d0rkfXeP/aDZ8ahUDvEm9FOlCtL7Qe5PovaKd2XEjwNPtAZiZmUMIrrfXj0n aBvHAXS4mISPjKRKE27Bo6pfW9BDwnfeQttwg= Received: by 10.224.200.136 with SMTP id ew8mr1234795qab.5.1318536409564; Thu, 13 Oct 2011 13:06:49 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.224.199.7 with SMTP id eq7ls5203888qab.3.gmail; Thu, 13 Oct 2011 13:06:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.224.33.205 with SMTP id i13mr3123851qad.5.1318536409079; Thu, 13 Oct 2011 13:06:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.224.33.205 with SMTP id i13mr3123850qad.5.1318536409059; Thu, 13 Oct 2011 13:06:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-qy0-f171.google.com (mail-qy0-f171.google.com [209.85.216.171]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id j6si518343qct.1.2011.10.13.13.06.48 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 13 Oct 2011 13:06:48 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 209.85.216.171 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of alanpost@sunflowerriver.org) client-ip=209.85.216.171; Received: by mail-qy0-f171.google.com with SMTP id 29so486983qyk.9 for ; Thu, 13 Oct 2011 13:06:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.68.16.166 with SMTP id h6mr11055299pbd.103.1318536407554; Thu, 13 Oct 2011 13:06:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sunflowerriver.org (c-76-113-7-111.hsd1.nm.comcast.net. [76.113.7.111]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id v8sm14646822pbf.8.2011.10.13.13.06.45 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 13 Oct 2011 13:06:46 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2011 14:06:42 -0601 From: ".alyn.post." To: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [lojban-beginners] Official stance on dots in names? Message-ID: <20111013200706.GA29295@sunflowerriver.org> Mail-Followup-To: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com References: MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: X-Original-Sender: alyn.post@lodockikumazvati.org X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 209.85.216.171 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of alanpost@sunflowerriver.org) smtp.mail=alanpost@sunflowerriver.org Reply-To: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com; contact lojban-beginners+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 300742228892 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline X-Spam-Score: 2.1 (++) X-Spam_score: 2.1 X-Spam_score_int: 21 X-Spam_bar: ++ X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "stodi.digitalkingdom.org", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 03:30:04PM -0400, .arpis. wrote: > e.g. {la .alyn.post.} > > jbofi'e is agreeable; camxes complains. > > Is there an official stance? > > -- > mu'o mi'e .arpis. > The portion of the grammar that parses this line, sumti-6, says in part: [...] Content analysis details: (2.1 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 1.4 BUG6152_INVALID_DATE_TZ_ABSURD BUG6152_INVALID_DATE_TZ_ABSURD 0.6 INVALID_DATE_TZ_ABSURD Invalid Date: header (timezone does not exist) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 03:30:04PM -0400, .arpis. wrote: > e.g. {la .alyn.post.} > > jbofi'e is agreeable; camxes complains. > > Is there an official stance? > > -- > mu'o mi'e .arpis. > The portion of the grammar that parses this line, sumti-6, says in part: LA-clause free* relative-clauses? CMENE-clause+ free* The '+' after the CMENE-clause being relevant. That is the same in both camxes[1] and jbogenturfahi[2]. I assume camxes has a bug higher up than the grammar causing this clause to parse incorrectly. 1: https://github.com/lojban/camxes/blob/master/lojban.peg 2: http://bugs.call-cc.org/browser/release/4/jbogenturfahi/trunk/gerna.peg -Alan -- .i ma'a lo bradi cu penmi gi'e du -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lojban Beginners" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban-beginners?hl=en.