Received: from mail-vw0-f61.google.com ([209.85.212.61]:41450)
	by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
	(Exim 4.76)
	(envelope-from <lojban-beginners+bncCMLaiI6rCBDd3KD4BBoEaWznuQ@googlegroups.com>)
	id 1RjUaO-00044z-2n; Sat, 07 Jan 2012 03:37:20 -0800
Received: by vbbfs19 with SMTP id fs19sf1854255vbb.16
        for <multiple recipients>; Sat, 07 Jan 2012 03:37:13 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=googlegroups.com; s=beta;
        h=x-beenthere:mime-version:date:in-reply-to:references:user-agent
         :x-http-useragent:message-id:subject:from:to:x-original-sender
         :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list
         :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender
         :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type
         :content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=wXJSfqsbdbUc33vZTelCoyV6qE7XfBBrwMASn8+Vtr0=;
        b=NWjcXPXISkXJKM70s9oLyqIJ4VS8UbsldTWwmvbvqBalcskRbjdQYdc8O3ZIPeV1wG
         zttVc/OLK6mk7v6dkDcqO/kT02KjA+EANIGFjZ+xSebJk6SiIDzuINu9TRjtQuTkutKN
         KvI3t85j5Db9SBFNPssZ35uTpq1Uw1NNaDSaM=
Received: by 10.52.176.135 with SMTP id ci7mr1527079vdc.10.1325936221319;
        Sat, 07 Jan 2012 03:37:01 -0800 (PST)
X-BeenThere: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com
Received: by 10.220.149.19 with SMTP id r19ls1347524vcv.2.canary; Sat, 07 Jan
 2012 03:37:00 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.52.174.80 with SMTP id bq16mr1511877vdc.11.1325936220758; Sat,
 07 Jan 2012 03:37:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: by g41g2000yqa.googlegroups.com with HTTP; Sat, 7 Jan 2012 03:37:00
 -0800 (PST)
Date: Sat, 7 Jan 2012 03:37:00 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CALm==BXzk=AEs3Xraci3djRLP3oufh=FfdUK5wtP3oK_w6UcgA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CALm==BXzk=AEs3Xraci3djRLP3oufh=FfdUK5wtP3oK_w6UcgA@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686) AppleWebKit/535.7 (KHTML, like
 Gecko) Chrome/16.0.912.63 Safari/535.7,gzip(gfe)
Message-ID: <489b3753-9749-4876-97a4-e95f9d586f30@g41g2000yqa.googlegroups.com>
Subject: [lojban-beginners] Re: Translation: If "every rule has at least one
 exception" is a rule, then at least one rule has no exception.
From: ianek <janek37@gmail.com>
To: Lojban Beginners <lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com>
X-Original-Sender: janek37@gmail.com
X-Original-Authentication-Results: ls.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain
 of janek37@gmail.com designates internal as permitted sender)
 smtp.mail=janek37@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com
Reply-To: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com
Precedence: list
Mailing-list: list lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com; contact lojban-beginners+owners@googlegroups.com
List-ID: <lojban-beginners.googlegroups.com>
X-Google-Group-Id: 300742228892
List-Post: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban-beginners/post?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com>
List-Help: <http://groups.google.com/support/?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban-beginners+help@googlegroups.com>
List-Archive: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban-beginners?hl=en_US>
Sender: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com
List-Subscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban-beginners/subscribe?hl=en_US>,
 <mailto:lojban-beginners+subscribe@googlegroups.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban-beginners/subscribe?hl=en_US>,
 <mailto:googlegroups-manage+300742228892+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/)
X-Spam_score: -0.7
X-Spam_score_int: -6
X-Spam_bar: /

At least, I would shorten it and decrease quantity of KOhA1. And fix
FA in the second part.

{ganai lo du'u fi ro javni fa da nafselte'i ku javni gi fi su'o pa
javni nafselte'i fa node}

But then, x3 of {nafselte'i} is a set, not a rule. The simplest fix
that comes to my mind is to use {fe tu'a}, but I'm not sure how to
tu'a-convert {ro javni}. Also, I'm not sure that du'u-fact fits x1 of
javni.

We need a lujvo for "x1 is an exception to a rule x2" and I can't
think of any. {naltinbe} is someone who doesn't obey the rule, so it's
no good. Our exception is not an element of a set like nafselte'i, but
a situation in which the rule doesn't apply, I think.

mu'o mi'e ianek

On 7 Sty, 00:27, Alex Rozenshteyn <rpglove...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I came up with this:
>
> {ganai lo du'u fi ro da poi javni fa de nafselte'i ku javni gi da'o da
> poi javni fi node nafselte'i}
>
> Is there anything wrong with it? Would you say it differently?
>
> --
> =A0=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0Alex R

--=20
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "=
Lojban Beginners" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@=
googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban=
-beginners?hl=3Den.