Received: from mail-fa0-f61.google.com ([209.85.161.61]:42284) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1S2gz7-0008Rx-UO; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 02:42:18 -0800 Received: by fabs1 with SMTP id s1sf4934427fab.16 for ; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 02:42:04 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:received-spf:mime-version:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=Sdg0jD1+zpLA7n6vQ9kXTeDkjPYr2SDaAaHX39DM8aQ=; b=eJUhNZoTnUHNBLtvdakNUb7SMSIw2TW0KOZXRFhFgZGRPu3+Uq5xibr4LyP2qNtdzZ caoT3idymBzOVCuwH+ZKegKnQxXzVSK4TNm9zu/7qxWjxmFiFY14jl0TtPYCfFBBkoP2 munieCDT8yfGVa9+4cuVSwPBlvm/fZ6jgkn0A= Received: by 10.180.92.130 with SMTP id cm2mr5355815wib.0.1330512099648; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 02:41:39 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.180.78.200 with SMTP id d8ls256764wix.2.gmail; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 02:41:38 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.180.8.35 with SMTP id o3mr1702414wia.4.1330512098935; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 02:41:38 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.180.8.35 with SMTP id o3mr1702413wia.4.1330512098912; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 02:41:38 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-ww0-f52.google.com (mail-ww0-f52.google.com [74.125.82.52]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id ex8si6980549wib.1.2012.02.29.02.41.38 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 29 Feb 2012 02:41:38 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of sonarman.77@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.52 as permitted sender) client-ip=74.125.82.52; Received: by wgbdq12 with SMTP id dq12so404119wgb.9 for ; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 02:41:38 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of sonarman.77@gmail.com designates 10.180.103.35 as permitted sender) client-ip=10.180.103.35; Received: from mr.google.com ([10.180.103.35]) by 10.180.103.35 with SMTP id ft3mr14895548wib.0.1330512098887 (num_hops = 1); Wed, 29 Feb 2012 02:41:38 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.180.103.35 with SMTP id ft3mr11897461wib.0.1330512098822; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 02:41:38 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.223.75.143 with HTTP; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 02:41:38 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <20175076.35.1329644296130.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@ynlt17> <20120229105535.00004f74@unknown> Date: Wed, 29 Feb 2012 00:41:38 -1000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban-beginners] Re: questions about 'cu' From: Patrick To: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: sonarman.77@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of sonarman.77@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.52 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=sonarman.77@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com; contact lojban-beginners+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 300742228892 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d043bd7e8050b5804ba17fd4b X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam_score: 0.0 X-Spam_score_int: 0 X-Spam_bar: / --f46d043bd7e8050b5804ba17fd4b Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Well, so far I haven't managed to find anything which says the way I wrote it is wrong. "LE PU broda" constructions and "LE broda PU brode" both appear, with the meaning of the "LE PU broda" being equivalent to what I said it would be individually (CLL C 10 12.12), and "LE broda PU brode" giving the meaning I said that fragment would have (CLL, C 6, 2.8), however, I haven't yet found any examples of the two types together (namely, "LE PU broda PU brode") and *why* that's unambiguous. CLL C 10 *does* say " The placement of a tense construct within a Lojban bridi is easy: right before the selbri. It goes immediately after the ``cu'', and can in fact always replace the ``cu'' (although in very complex sentences the rules for eliding terminators may be changed as a result). " I feel confident in thinking that what I wrote is both gramatically correct and conveyed the meaning I wanted it to, I'm just looking for how I'm right. Will update again soon. mi'e .tavic. On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 12:28 AM, Patrick wrote: > Hmm, I'm not sure. There might have to still be a "cu" in there, but I'm > not positive. I think maybe you can't nest PU inside of tanru? I'll get > back to you in a few minutes. My disclaimer before I begin to find out > just how wrong I am: I'm very tired, and it's very late in my time zone. > Write again soon. > > mi'e .tavic. > > > On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 11:55 PM, Klaus F. Abel wrote: > >> On Tue, 28 Feb 2012 23:07:58 -1000 >> Patrick wrote: >> >> > Well, I wouldn't say that "ca" (or any of selma'o PU) can replace "cu" >> > unambiguously. Take the following sentence: >> > >> > lo ca klama ca pinxe >> > >> > In this case, the first "ca" attaches to the sumti to make it mean >> > something like "the one currently going", where the second "ca" >> attaches to >> > the selbri of the entire bridi, for a total meaning of "the one >> currently >> > going is currently drinking", possibly alluding to someone drinking >> while >> > driving or biking. >> > >> >> How do you identify "pinxe" as a selbri in this case at all, i.e. what >> stops one from reading the whole "ca klama ca pinxe" as a tanru (regardless >> of how it would make sense in translation)? Is this really ambiguous, or >> just plain wrong (the selbri reading, I mean)? >> >> Klaus >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "Lojban Beginners" group. >> To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com. >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. >> For more options, visit this group at >> http://groups.google.com/group/lojban-beginners?hl=en. >> >> > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lojban Beginners" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban-beginners?hl=en. --f46d043bd7e8050b5804ba17fd4b Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Well, so far I haven't managed to find anything which says the way I wr= ote it is wrong. =A0"LE PU broda" constructions and "LE brod= a PU brode" both appear, with the meaning of the "LE PU broda&quo= t; being equivalent to what I said it would be individually (CLL C 10 12.12= ), and "LE broda PU brode" giving the meaning I said that fragmen= t would have (CLL, C 6, 2.8), however, I haven't yet found any examples= of the two types together (namely, "LE PU broda PU brode") and *= why* that's unambiguous. =A0CLL C 10 *does* say " The placement of a tense construct w= ithin a Lojban bridi is easy: right before the selbri. It goes immediately = after the ``cu'', and can in fact always replace the ``cu''= (although in very complex sentences the rules for eliding terminators may = be changed as a result).=A0" =A0I feel confident in thinking th= at what I wrote is both gramatically correct and conveyed the meaning I wan= ted it to, I'm just looking for how I'm right. Will update again so= on.

mi'e .tavic.

On Wed, F= eb 29, 2012 at 12:28 AM, Patrick <sonarman.77@gmail.com> wrote:
Hmm, I'm not sure. =A0There might have to still be a "cu" in = there, but I'm not positive. =A0I think maybe you can't nest PU ins= ide of tanru? =A0I'll get back to you in a few minutes. =A0My disclaime= r before I begin to find out just how wrong I am: =A0I'm very tired, an= d it's very late in my time zone. =A0Write again soon.

mi'e .tavic.


On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 11:55 PM, Klaus F. Abel <kfa@gmx.net&g= t; wrote:
On Tue, 28 Feb 2012 23:07:58 -1000
Patrick <sona= rman.77@gmail.com> wrote:

> Well, I wouldn't say that "ca" (or any of selma'o PU= ) can replace "cu"
> unambiguously. =A0Take the following sentence:
>
> lo ca klama ca pinxe
>
> In this case, the first "ca" attaches to the sumti to make i= t mean
> something like "the one currently going", where the second &= quot;ca" attaches to
> the selbri of the entire bridi, for a total meaning of "the one c= urrently
> going is currently drinking", possibly alluding to someone drinki= ng while
> driving or biking.
>

How do you identify "pinxe" as a selbri in this case at all= , i.e. what stops one from reading the whole "ca klama ca pinxe" = as a tanru (regardless of how it would make sense in translation)? Is this = really ambiguous, or just plain wrong (the selbri reading, I mean)?

Klaus

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;Lojban Beginners" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban-beginners+un= subscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/g= roup/lojban-beginners?hl=3Den.



--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= Lojban Beginners" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@= googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= -beginners?hl=3Den.
--f46d043bd7e8050b5804ba17fd4b--