Received: from mail-iy0-f189.google.com ([209.85.210.189]:52003) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1S3v0b-0008VI-3a; Sat, 03 Mar 2012 11:52:50 -0800 Received: by iahk25 with SMTP id k25sf2392646iah.16 for ; Sat, 03 Mar 2012 11:52:43 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of lojban-beginners+bncCIfp7ILVEBDx7Mn6BBoEi7Ypkw@googlegroups.com designates 10.68.125.230 as permitted sender) client-ip=10.68.125.230; Authentication-Results: mr.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of lojban-beginners+bncCIfp7ILVEBDx7Mn6BBoEi7Ypkw@googlegroups.com designates 10.68.125.230 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=lojban-beginners+bncCIfp7ILVEBDx7Mn6BBoEi7Ypkw@googlegroups.com; dkim=pass header.i=lojban-beginners+bncCIfp7ILVEBDx7Mn6BBoEi7Ypkw@googlegroups.com Received: from mr.google.com ([10.68.125.230]) by 10.68.125.230 with SMTP id mt6mr11554469pbb.9.1330804362837 (num_hops = 1); Sat, 03 Mar 2012 11:52:42 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:received-spf:mime-version:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=pLVd5QvnyOZXHoshtno8frj7h5pUD8JEccWrO81+EqQ=; b=XsEoo9M3GEBgjWE1PjUZsLmPe8lzS16zm4GPb8nIuee6TNzXt5UucKvu0MzM7CRsFn QdKgKM1d6oktCzyaVcAXaehQeIC4cW8vMhot9MdLn5Vf+pQAppOacedkwZmSm5lPqTz+ ktnO4TDZetChKJfeA/pI26nyx4D8Kpti83nYU= Received: by 10.68.125.230 with SMTP id mt6mr3368668pbb.9.1330804337528; Sat, 03 Mar 2012 11:52:17 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.68.74.5 with SMTP id p5ls9649084pbv.7.gmail; Sat, 03 Mar 2012 11:52:17 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.68.74.201 with SMTP id w9mr13533635pbv.0.1330804337028; Sat, 03 Mar 2012 11:52:17 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.68.74.201 with SMTP id w9mr13533634pbv.0.1330804337015; Sat, 03 Mar 2012 11:52:17 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-pz0-f51.google.com (mail-pz0-f51.google.com [209.85.210.51]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id e6si12011678pbt.1.2012.03.03.11.52.16 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sat, 03 Mar 2012 11:52:17 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of felipeg.assis@gmail.com designates 209.85.210.51 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.210.51; Received: by dady9 with SMTP id y9so3218500dad.10 for ; Sat, 03 Mar 2012 11:52:16 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of felipeg.assis@gmail.com designates 10.68.203.74 as permitted sender) client-ip=10.68.203.74; Received: from mr.google.com ([10.68.203.74]) by 10.68.203.74 with SMTP id ko10mr8715108pbc.125.1330804336976 (num_hops = 1); Sat, 03 Mar 2012 11:52:16 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.68.203.74 with SMTP id ko10mr7645433pbc.125.1330804336834; Sat, 03 Mar 2012 11:52:16 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.68.189.133 with HTTP; Sat, 3 Mar 2012 11:52:16 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <8929c895-6264-4ae8-b9ff-1d3b3094d404@gr6g2000vbb.googlegroups.com> <20120302180216.GP29980@stodi.digitalkingdom.org> <4F5156CA.3040104@plasmatix.com> Date: Sat, 3 Mar 2012 16:52:16 -0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban-beginners] Re: Let's do something like this for Lojban! From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Felipe_Gon=E7alves_Assis?= To: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: felipeg.assis@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of felipeg.assis@gmail.com designates 209.85.210.51 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=felipeg.assis@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com; contact lojban-beginners+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 300742228892 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: 2.8 (++) X-Spam_score: 2.8 X-Spam_score_int: 28 X-Spam_bar: ++ X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "stodi.digitalkingdom.org", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: On 3 March 2012 15:30, Remo Dentato wrote: > 2012/3/3 Felipe Gonçalves Assis : >> I suggest starting with >> >> 2. mi me la .clalis. > > Why not simply {mi'e la .clalis} ? > BTW, {clalis} doesn't have the same sound of the orginal that is (if I > understood correctly) roughly equivalent to the Chinese "Chen Li" I'd > prefer {tcenlis} > [...] Content analysis details: (2.8 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (felipeg.assis[at]gmail.com) -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [209.85.210.189 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED No valid author signature, adsp_override is CUSTOM_MED -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 FUZZY_CPILL BODY: Attempt to obfuscate words in spam 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature 1.3 DRUGS_ERECTILE_OBFU Obfuscated reference to an erectile drug 2.2 DRUGS_ERECTILE Refers to an erectile drug 0.0 T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL To: misformatted and free email service On 3 March 2012 15:30, Remo Dentato wrote: > 2012/3/3 Felipe Gon=E7alves Assis : >> I suggest starting with >> >> 2. mi me la .clalis. > > Why not simply {mi'e la .clalis} ? > BTW, {clalis} doesn't have the same sound of the orginal that is (if I > understood correctly) roughly equivalent to the Chinese "Chen Li" I'd > prefer {tcenlis} > The straightforward and realistic sentence would be {mi'e .clalis.}, I just considered that paralleling 2 and 3 helps understanding the sentence structure in 3 (as 2 and 4 in the original). This is the burden of translating an introduction to a different language. >> 3. ta me la .djan. > This seems a good place to assign {ko'a} -> 3. ta goi ko'a me la .djan. > Just consider how hard it is to figure out the sentence structure at first sight. Firstly, it is too long and too dissimilar from nearby sentences. Secondly,= the concept of assignment is highly unexpected. To introduce it via illustrated examples, I would dedicate a whole sequence of examples to that single concept and employ at least one reassignment. Furthermore, when do you expect to use {ko'a} again? The girl is pointing all the time. And, in particular, in 16, she is talking to a guy who was ab= sent in 3. >> 4. zo .djan. cmene ta > I would use the lujvo {selme'e} -> 4. ko'a selme'e zo .djan. > This would avoid using {se}, I agree it's too early, the nintandi > would not know about the relationship between {selme'e} and {cmene}, > they would just guess it means "is named". > That is fine. But why are you avoiding the gismu? >> Also, I recommend using the ti-series in place of the ko'a-series. > Not sure. I would prefer introducing {ko'a} and friends. > It is nice to introduce {ko'a}, but, as I said, that is infeasible without a dedicated story, or at such an early point of this one. >> Using the latter while pointing can cause so much confusion... >> >> In 12 we may do >> 12. lo prenu cu zvati tu > > My preference would be {vuku ko'e goi tu zvati} > > Using {tu} as zvati2 seems too prone to ambiguity. At least it should > be {lovu} so that it is clear you're talking about "there yonder". > Wouldn't the roles of zvati1 and zvati2 be clear from 10 and 11? Similarly, isn't it clear from the green circles that they are talking abou= t position? To me, once you know {mi} or {do} you can figure out the sentence structure right away, which in this case would show the reader the flexibility of lojban demonstratives. ta'o zo'o Here is an alternative: 10. vi me mi 11. va me do 12. vu prenu mu'o mi'e .asiz, --=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= Lojban Beginners" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@= googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= -beginners?hl=3Den.