Received: from mail-ey0-f189.google.com ([209.85.215.189]:49573) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1S52bQ-0004Qh-OP; Tue, 06 Mar 2012 14:11:30 -0800 Received: by eaan10 with SMTP id n10sf5524581eaa.16 for ; Tue, 06 Mar 2012 14:11:21 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of lojban-beginners+bncCMHEmaCOBhDwltr6BBoE716wuQ@googlegroups.com designates 10.204.129.219 as permitted sender) client-ip=10.204.129.219; Authentication-Results: mr.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of lojban-beginners+bncCMHEmaCOBhDwltr6BBoE716wuQ@googlegroups.com designates 10.204.129.219 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=lojban-beginners+bncCMHEmaCOBhDwltr6BBoE716wuQ@googlegroups.com; dkim=pass header.i=lojban-beginners+bncCMHEmaCOBhDwltr6BBoE716wuQ@googlegroups.com Received: from mr.google.com ([10.204.129.219]) by 10.204.129.219 with SMTP id p27mr1256628bks.16.1331071881141 (num_hops = 1); Tue, 06 Mar 2012 14:11:21 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:received-spf:mime-version:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=9YMZFCt9fp3TE3aMjaggluL6USM/kxw66Srztm8bOJ8=; b=uE35+6mlFfgk7+d5Hu5A3UpuuWBqnEGuBC7WeLKmjGNVr8JqTdNW9xb0g5eOxmiBOZ mjiT/G147KLwEfix+z/PFixsnH7W6X/DaOqXcBa+u9h0EwQwG8lGre+zgh6QPHpwxwF2 QsF3rO3c0wtRlbgODG+IjPYkqmUVsdB1qCKhE= Received: by 10.204.129.219 with SMTP id p27mr384571bks.16.1331071856599; Tue, 06 Mar 2012 14:10:56 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.204.181.202 with SMTP id bz10ls1655317bkb.0.gmail; Tue, 06 Mar 2012 14:10:55 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.204.129.15 with SMTP id m15mr340033bks.2.1331071855135; Tue, 06 Mar 2012 14:10:55 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.204.129.15 with SMTP id m15mr340032bks.2.1331071855109; Tue, 06 Mar 2012 14:10:55 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-lpp01m010-f50.google.com (mail-lpp01m010-f50.google.com [209.85.215.50]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id o5si23328172bkz.0.2012.03.06.14.10.54 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 06 Mar 2012 14:10:55 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of eyeonus@gmail.com designates 209.85.215.50 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.215.50; Received: by lahm13 with SMTP id m13so8539967lah.23 for ; Tue, 06 Mar 2012 14:10:54 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of eyeonus@gmail.com designates 10.112.86.198 as permitted sender) client-ip=10.112.86.198; Received: from mr.google.com ([10.112.86.198]) by 10.112.86.198 with SMTP id r6mr12384241lbz.53.1331071854796 (num_hops = 1); Tue, 06 Mar 2012 14:10:54 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.112.86.198 with SMTP id r6mr10168016lbz.53.1331071853949; Tue, 06 Mar 2012 14:10:53 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.152.148.225 with HTTP; Tue, 6 Mar 2012 14:10:53 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <979cda85-1352-4c77-8d2a-de697d68b7af@v2g2000vbx.googlegroups.com> References: <8929c895-6264-4ae8-b9ff-1d3b3094d404@gr6g2000vbb.googlegroups.com> <201203040828.29096.phma@phma.optus.nu> <979cda85-1352-4c77-8d2a-de697d68b7af@v2g2000vbx.googlegroups.com> Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2012 15:10:53 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban-beginners] Re: Let's do something like this for Lojban! From: Jonathan Jones To: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: eyeonus@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of eyeonus@gmail.com designates 209.85.215.50 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=eyeonus@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com; contact lojban-beginners+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 300742228892 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=bcaec554d6dc0674ac04ba9a5174 X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam_score: -0.7 X-Spam_score_int: -6 X-Spam_bar: / --bcaec554d6dc0674ac04ba9a5174 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 1:54 PM, ianek wrote: > > > 20. cy: doi.djan. do ralte lo ta mo > > I think it should be "lo va mo", parallel to 17. > It should be. I'm going to call this a typo. > > dy: zo.flyfis. cmene > > Why not flufis? Ceqli "u" is defined "U as in bOOt". > It seems fairly obvious to me that "flufizo" is a Ceqli-ization of "Fluffy", which is a fairly common English name for a dog. .flyfis. is closer to "Fluffy" than .flufis. > > 27. go'i .ijenai lo cy. dalpe'o na gerku .i lo go'i cu mlatu .i lo mlatu > cu > > Double negation? I think it should be either {go'i .ije lo cy. dalpe'o > na gerku} or {go'i .ijenai lo cy. dalpe'o gerku}. The former is > simpler for beginners, pe'i. > Huh. I thought I'd fixed that. Hm, it must be some other spot that had a double negative I fixed.... > 28. xu la snime cu mlatu .i sny. barda.iepei mlatu > > {sny} is not a Lojban word, according to vlatai. Yes. I know. > {sy} was taken by > Sam, but it refers (without {goi}) to the most recent S-sumti, am I > right? > I don't know. What I do know is, beginner's /won't/ know, and will most likely assume that sy. will still reference Sam. I thought of saying syny., but I wasn't certain if readers would get that syny. = la snime, whereas I'm fairly certain they would get sny. = la snime I also thought of using my., but again, I wasn't sure if readers would be able to transition along my. = le mlatu = la snime I suppose I could say lo go'i... > > > 40. la.djan. mi speni .i la.djan. nakspe mi .ije mi fetspe dy. .i mi'a me > > lo nakspe je fetspe gi'e kansa xabju > > Wouldn't {joi} be more appropriate here, instead of {je}? > Possibly, but it introduces a new concept, and je is still appropriate. mi'a me lo nakspe je fetspe = "myself-and-others are-amongst-those-that-are something-which-actually-is-one-or-more-wives-and-husbands" > > 50. lo vu cipni cu danlu gi'enai dalpe'o .i lo dalpe'o cu danlu pendo > gi'e > > xabju lo nanmu je ninmu .i lo vu cipni cu xabju lo tricu > > > Again, why {je}? I thought that {nanmu je ninmu} is some kind of > hermaphrodite... I would say {lo nanmu ja ninmu} or {lo nanmu a lo > ninmu}. > It's not my fault you're assuming {lo nanmu je ninmu} refers to a single entity. Yes, it should be {lo nanmu ja ninmu}. > > > 54. cy: xu do'o srana lo verba > > I don't think {stuzi} would work here... So maybe let's keep 42 as is. > That was my thinking. > > 56. lo mi'a bersa cu zvati ti .i lo go'i cu barda lo vu nanla .i se cmene > > {barda fi lo vu nanla} > I'm not sure that barda3 ("standard/norm") works like bramau2, but > ok... > I'll just add zmadu and make it a tanru. I don't like the idea of using yet another new lujvo, but you're right that barda alone doesn't really work. > > 60. le ci verba cu bersa mi .ija'a bersa mi .i mi mamta le ci verba .i > > The second {bersa mi} sounds redundant, much more than the original. I > would remove it. > I don't consider redundancy in a teaching tool to be a valid reason for removal. > > > by: ko'a goi zo.zam. .i lo go'i cu bruna la.sam. .i mi fetspe > la.sam. > > {ko'a goi la.zam.} > Thank you. I must've done that by mistake when I was changing the {la} in the {se cmene la.} occurrences to {zo}. > > > 63. cy: ta mo > > by: ta patfu mi .i ta se cmene zo.baluz. .i la.baluz. patfu mi > .iji'a > > pafspe la.sam. gi'e mamypa'u ci mi'a verba .i la.sam. be'aspe la.baluz. > > sy: coi.beluz. > > {baluz} (or {balus}, whatever) > Typo. > > > 65. ji'a la.baluz. .e la.djin. srana lo bersa noi se cmene zo.jos. .i > > In Ceqli "o" is pronounced "ou", as in "boat", so maybe {djous}? Too > bad he'd be another "dy" in sight. > Same thing as with Fluffy. His name is obviously Joe. The "yet another dy." is my reason for not calling him .djos. > I'll make the fixes and re-post the translation when I have. -- mu'o mi'e .aionys. .i.e'ucai ko cmima lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi.luk. mi patfu do zo'o (Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. :D ) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lojban Beginners" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban-beginners?hl=en. --bcaec554d6dc0674ac04ba9a5174 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 1:54 PM, ianek <janek37@gmail.com>= wrote:
<snip>
> 20. cy: doi.djan. do ralte lo ta mo

I think it should be "lo va mo", parallel to 17.
<= /blockquote>

It should be. I'm going to call this a typo.
<= br>
<snip>
> =A0 =A0 =A0dy: zo.flyfis. cmene

Why not flufis? Ceqli "u" is defined "U as in bOOt&quo= t;.

It seems fairly obvious to me that "flufi= zo" is a Ceqli-ization of "Fluffy", which is a fairly common= English name for a dog. .flyfis. is closer to "Fluffy" than .flu= fis.

<snip>
> 27. go'i .ijenai lo cy. dalpe= 9;o na gerku .i lo go'i cu mlatu .i lo mlatu cu

Double negation? I think it should be either {go'i .ije lo cy. da= lpe'o
na gerku} or {go'i .ijenai lo cy. dalpe'o gerku}. The former is
simpler for beginners, pe'i.

Huh. I thought I&= #39;d fixed that. Hm, it must be some other spot that had a double negative= I fixed....

> 28. xu la snime cu mlatu .i sny. barda.iepei mlatu

{sny} is not a Lojban word, according to vlatai.
Yes. I know.
=A0
<snip>
> 40. la.djan. mi speni .i la.djan. nakspe mi .ije mi fetspe dy. .i mi&#= 39;a me
> lo nakspe je fetspe gi'e kansa xabju

Wouldn't {joi} be more appropriate here, instead of {je}?

Possibly, but it introduces a new concept, and je is stil= l appropriate.

mi'a me lo nakspe je fetspe =3D "myself-and= -others are-amongst-those-that-are something-which-actually-is-one-or-more-= wives-and-husbands"

<snip>
> 50. lo vu cipni cu danlu gi'enai dalpe'o .i lo dalpe'o cu = danlu pendo gi'e
> xabju lo nanmu je ninmu .i lo vu cipni cu xabju lo tricu


Again, why {je}? I thought that {nanmu je ninmu} is some kind of<= br> hermaphrodite... I would say {lo nanmu ja ninmu} or {lo nanmu a lo
ninmu}.

It's not my fault you're assuming = {lo nanmu je ninmu} refers to a single entity.

Yes, it should be {lo= nanmu ja ninmu}.
=A0
<snip>
> 54. cy: xu do'o srana lo verba

I don't think {stuzi} would work here... So maybe let's keep = 42 as is.

That was my thinking.

<snip>
> 56. lo mi'a bersa cu zvati ti .i= lo go'i cu barda lo vu nanla .i se cmene

{barda fi lo vu nanla}
I'm not sure that barda3 ("standard/norm") works like bramau2= , but
ok...

I'll just add zmadu and make it a tanru.= I don't like the idea of using yet another new lujvo, but you're r= ight that barda alone doesn't really work.

<snip>
> 60. le ci verba cu bersa mi .ija'a bersa mi .i mi mamta le ci verb= a .i

The second {bersa mi} sounds redundant, much more than the original. = I
would remove it.

I don't consider redundancy i= n a teaching tool to be a valid reason for removal.
=A0
<snip>
> =A0 =A0 =A0 by: ko'a goi zo.zam. .i lo go'i cu bruna la.sam. .= i mi fetspe la.sam.

{ko'a goi la.zam.}

Thank you. I must'= ;ve done that by mistake when I was changing the {la} in the {se cmene la.}= occurrences to {zo}.
=A0
<snip>
> 63. cy: ta mo
> =A0 =A0 =A0 by: ta patfu mi .i ta se cmene zo.baluz. .i la.baluz. patf= u mi .iji'a
> pafspe la.sam. gi'e mamypa'u ci mi'a verba .i la.sam. be&#= 39;aspe la.baluz.
> =A0 =A0 =A0 sy: coi.beluz.

{baluz} (or {balus}, whatever)

Typo.
=A0<= /div>
<snip>
> 65. ji'a la.baluz. .e la.djin. srana lo bersa noi se cmene zo.jos.= .i

In Ceqli "o" is pronounced "ou", as in "boat= ", so maybe {djous}? Too
bad he'd be another "dy" in sight.

S= ame thing as with Fluffy. His name is obviously Joe. The "yet another = dy." is my reason for not calling him .djos.

<snip>

I'll make the fixes and re-post the transl= ation when I have.

--
mu'o mi'e .aionys.

.i.e'= ;ucai ko cmima lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi.luk. mi patfu do zo'o
(Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. :D )

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= Lojban Beginners" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@= googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= -beginners?hl=3Den.
--bcaec554d6dc0674ac04ba9a5174--