Received: from mail-yw0-f61.google.com ([209.85.213.61]:45263) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1S7pKV-0005Gp-Su; Wed, 14 Mar 2012 07:37:32 -0700 Received: by yhkk25 with SMTP id k25sf2895151yhk.16 for ; Wed, 14 Mar 2012 07:37:25 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=/Jk12c+AguPlfsVLy5Yeqwjer1CmzHN3XJKCUangu9g=; b=Hz34WF0bTvSn3YGsEeMNjieiYnAjBLpcXOfE8DtI5a1bcLs3be5G5TN9U+tYVj9cSN orucf7Lzn+0Yan9emqITKKT5WMOhbxHRqgksR+wg1NDjWOOlkHN6XhXHi//lYdu37ZEz zDThn5nji4ZjqCS75gIjVKHy7a0B+JSZCyka4= Received: by 10.68.233.33 with SMTP id tt1mr628948pbc.16.1331735821401; Wed, 14 Mar 2012 07:37:01 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.68.28.170 with SMTP id c10ls4985933pbh.3.gmail; Wed, 14 Mar 2012 07:37:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.68.235.4 with SMTP id ui4mr2800952pbc.3.1331735820701; Wed, 14 Mar 2012 07:37:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.68.235.4 with SMTP id ui4mr2800951pbc.3.1331735820688; Wed, 14 Mar 2012 07:37:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-pz0-f45.google.com (mail-pz0-f45.google.com [209.85.210.45]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id e6si4976438pbt.1.2012.03.14.07.37.00 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 14 Mar 2012 07:37:00 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of felipeg.assis@gmail.com designates 209.85.210.45 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.210.45; Received: by dadp14 with SMTP id p14so7899713dad.18 for ; Wed, 14 Mar 2012 07:37:00 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.68.216.132 with SMTP id oq4mr3489621pbc.41.1331735820577; Wed, 14 Mar 2012 07:37:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.68.189.133 with HTTP; Wed, 14 Mar 2012 07:37:00 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <201203132209.51268.phma@phma.optus.nu> References: <201203132209.51268.phma@phma.optus.nu> Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2012 11:37:00 -0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban-beginners] Phrasing question: time intervals From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Felipe_Gon=E7alves_Assis?= To: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: felipeg.assis@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of felipeg.assis@gmail.com designates 209.85.210.45 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=felipeg.assis@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com; contact lojban-beginners+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 300742228892 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam_score: -0.7 X-Spam_score_int: -6 X-Spam_bar: / On 13 March 2012 23:09, Pierre Abbat wrote: > On Tuesday, March 13, 2012 18:52:33 .arpis. wrote: >> "I will be free between 9:30 and 10:30 and between 1:00 and 5:00" >> {mi zilfre ze'a lo temci be li so pi mu bei li dau pi mu be'o .e lo >> temci be li pa bei li mu be'o} >> >> Is the use of {temci} correct here? {ze'a}? temci2 and temci3 are not numbers, but events. You may use {lo se tcika be li...}. >> Is there a shorter way to say it? > My suggestion is {mi zifre ti'u li so pi mu bi'o pano pi mu jo'u li pa bi'o mu}. You may use {e} instead of {jo'u} if you prefer. You could use a single mekso with the union-operator {jo'e}, but I recommend limiting the complexity of mekso. > I'd say "mi zifre ca li so pi'e cino bi'obo li pano pi'e cino .e li pa pi'e > bi'obo li mu pi'e". jbofi'e doesn't like that; it wants "lo'o" (the terminator > for "li") before "bi'o". One of the "bo" is necessary but the other isn't. > {ca} tags an event. A number is not an event. {ca lo se tcika be li...} should be acceptable. Even so, I don't think {ca} implies that the freeness extends along the whole interval, just that it intersects it. I guess that jbofi'e complains because {bi'o} could be continuing the mekso. Maybe its a CFG vs. PEG thing? ta'o > I assume that the first period is in the morning and the second is in the > afternoon. To make that clear, I'd say "li pano pi'e cino pe le cerni ... li > mu pi'e pe le vanci" or "li paci pi'e bi'o li paze pi'e". If you're an > astronomer, you probably want to reverse the assumption. "pe le cerni" > associates only with "li pano pi'e cino", so if the interval crosses noon, you > can tag the first time with "pe le cerni" and the second with "pe le vanci" (or > tag both with "pe le donri"). If you want to tag the whole time interval with > "pe le cerni", I'm not sure. jbofi'e balks at "ke". > Why not use 24h time? For 12h time a convention similar to "a.m/p.m" could be used, since, e.g., {pa pi mu vy} is a valid expression. Isn't there such kind of convention? mu'o mi'e .asiz. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lojban Beginners" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban-beginners?hl=en.