Received: from mail-we0-f189.google.com ([74.125.82.189]:37817) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1S7tap-0008Sn-PP; Wed, 14 Mar 2012 12:10:45 -0700 Received: by wera1 with SMTP id a1sf1962971wer.16 for ; Wed, 14 Mar 2012 12:10:32 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=d6uG05ejY8wmP/9omHORipGyy7LgXlV1dy7nfBlDKpA=; b=QJ0dTu9idSv87mmhoDGkmu+C4XNKm8kyskc+WsoReX8GskSKhptxBXyQ4OjW0QU3la rr64/fgW8wMI/paO1WRg7op5cTWj48LPoMImT+1MuMw6GsKgfJbA9IfaYB4Rb5VbIpy2 5wvT0S5A8hkqdsA5AUrCVBmTCOBWT+Hmjd7kA= Received: by 10.204.152.16 with SMTP id e16mr450370bkw.31.1331752208239; Wed, 14 Mar 2012 12:10:08 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.204.45.87 with SMTP id d23ls3077062bkf.2.gmail; Wed, 14 Mar 2012 12:10:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.153.5 with SMTP id i5mr408231bkw.1.1331752207248; Wed, 14 Mar 2012 12:10:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.153.5 with SMTP id i5mr408230bkw.1.1331752207214; Wed, 14 Mar 2012 12:10:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-lb0-f171.google.com (mail-lb0-f171.google.com [209.85.217.171]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id cs9si5475316bkb.3.2012.03.14.12.10.07 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 14 Mar 2012 12:10:07 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of eyeonus@gmail.com designates 209.85.217.171 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.217.171; Received: by mail-lb0-f171.google.com with SMTP id ge1so1227533lbb.2 for ; Wed, 14 Mar 2012 12:10:07 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.152.147.1 with SMTP id tg1mr2816951lab.22.1331752206974; Wed, 14 Mar 2012 12:10:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.152.148.225 with HTTP; Wed, 14 Mar 2012 12:10:06 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2012 13:10:06 -0600 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Re: [lojban-beginners] Reuse request From: Jonathan Jones To: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: eyeonus@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of eyeonus@gmail.com designates 209.85.217.171 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=eyeonus@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com; contact lojban-beginners+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 300742228892 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=e89a8f23517739c06404bb38b969 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam_score: 0.0 X-Spam_score_int: 0 X-Spam_bar: / --e89a8f23517739c06404bb38b969 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 No, there's no need. The fact of the text being in separate panels is enough. In panels where a single person is saying multiple sentences, they are separated with {.i}. If a person said {coi}, and then 3 seconds later said {mi do nelci}, would you think they were talking to themselves about something you like? On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 7:54 AM, wrote: > Il giorno , Michael Turniansky ha scritto: > > > Should we insist on .i separators in the second and subsequent panels? > > I think we should. I always envisaged lojban comics dialags to be a > continous stream of text for each character speaking. > > One might think that there's an implicit {.i} at the begininng of a new > balloon but this would break some dialogue that uses multiple balloons for > a single utterance (for example to show a different point of view in a new > panel). > > I once experimented with using ":" as an alternative ortography for {.i} > (just imagine the initial dot and the small dot over the "i" to be > re-arranged in space) but it doesn't seem to have caught on. There's an > example here: > http://www.lojban.org/tiki/tiki-download_wiki_attachment.php?attId=751 . > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Lojban Beginners" group. > To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/lojban-beginners?hl=en. > -- mu'o mi'e .aionys. .i.e'ucai ko cmima lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi.luk. mi patfu do zo'o (Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. :D ) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lojban Beginners" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban-beginners?hl=en. --e89a8f23517739c06404bb38b969 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable No, there's no need. The fact of the text being in separate panels is e= nough. In panels where a single person is saying multiple sentences, they a= re separated with {.i}.

If a person said {coi}, and then 3 seconds l= ater said {mi do nelci}, would you think they were talking to themselves ab= out something you like?

On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 7:54 AM, <rdentato@gmail.com&g= t; wrote:
Il giorno , Michael Turniansky <mturniansky@gmail.com> ha scritto:

> =A0 Should we insist on .i separators in the second and subsequ= ent panels?

I think we should. I always envisaged lojban comics dialags to be= a continous stream of text for each character speaking.

One might t= hink that there's an implicit {.i} at the begininng of a new balloon bu= t this would break some dialogue that uses multiple balloons for a single u= tterance (for example to show a different point of view in a new panel).
I once experimented with using ":" as an alternative ortograp= hy for {.i} (just imagine the initial dot and the small dot over the "= i" to be re-arranged in space) but it doesn't seem to have caught = on. There's an example here: http://www.loj= ban.org/tiki/tiki-download_wiki_attachment.php?attId=3D751 .

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;Lojban Beginners" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban-beginners+un= subscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/g= roup/lojban-beginners?hl=3Den.



--
mu'o mi= 'e .aionys.

.i.e'ucai ko cmima lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi.l= uk. mi patfu do zo'o
(Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. = :D )

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= Lojban Beginners" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@= googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= -beginners?hl=3Den.
--e89a8f23517739c06404bb38b969--