Received: from mail-yw0-f61.google.com ([209.85.213.61]:51164) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1S8WJk-0005Hy-4U; Fri, 16 Mar 2012 05:31:40 -0700 Received: by yhkk25 with SMTP id k25sf5827153yhk.16 for ; Fri, 16 Mar 2012 05:31:29 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references :from:date:message-id:subject:to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=oLn4irHf0iMaQ6uySDhezsBH5Ffwb8NZ2DuvCq0LEWM=; b=tVnJX6q4IWENTG8rT1b+NO6nNO2rJCNd6+LWPRzj6RQh3R1Yi7uWjILrAXulsmm/5L oHRqVi0w0uS5t6Pnryi1pe5lAi2v0Piewuir2ViBTlXINDCdPpW/N9EyYtlSElUSLzwR v7HyKoonk24tOiVgbAr3oQVH8+hGp2zssmFSI= Received: by 10.236.184.134 with SMTP id s6mr411471yhm.17.1331901065848; Fri, 16 Mar 2012 05:31:05 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.236.86.115 with SMTP id v79ls7706583yhe.2.gmail; Fri, 16 Mar 2012 05:31:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.101.136.30 with SMTP id o30mr1020313ann.14.1331901065351; Fri, 16 Mar 2012 05:31:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.101.136.30 with SMTP id o30mr1020312ann.14.1331901065335; Fri, 16 Mar 2012 05:31:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-gy0-f178.google.com (mail-gy0-f178.google.com [209.85.160.178]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id e44si3125252yhk.0.2012.03.16.05.31.05 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 16 Mar 2012 05:31:05 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of rpglover64@gmail.com designates 209.85.160.178 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.160.178; Received: by mail-gy0-f178.google.com with SMTP id f1so5077342ghb.37 for ; Fri, 16 Mar 2012 05:31:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.182.159.65 with SMTP id xa1mr2901752obb.25.1331901065194; Fri, 16 Mar 2012 05:31:05 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.182.153.68 with HTTP; Fri, 16 Mar 2012 05:30:42 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <2343119.814.1331896532433.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@ynkz21> References: <26361784.259.1331827845548.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@ynjw14> <2343119.814.1331896532433.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@ynkz21> From: ".arpis." Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2012 08:30:42 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban-beginners] Major flaw in Lojban ! (was:Pivotal sentences in Pandunia. How to express them in Lojban ?) To: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: rpglover64@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of rpglover64@gmail.com designates 209.85.160.178 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=rpglover64@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com; contact lojban-beginners+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 300742228892 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -0.4 (/) X-Spam_score: -0.4 X-Spam_score_int: -3 X-Spam_bar: / I disagree that this is a major flaw; this is simply one grammatical feature lojban lacks (I dont know of any language besides Pandunia that has it generally; I don't believe that your English example generalizes). Also, Pandunia omits unnecessary pronouns, so "I ask you to greet me" is frequently said "peti tshau mi", which is exactly analogous to lojban's {cpedu lo nu rinsa mi}. I remember another grammatical feature I miss in lojban: the inability to put a selbri at the end of a bridi as an adverb: e.g. "I go from my house to the store prouldly" {mi jgira klama lo zdani lo zaisle}; {mi klama lo zdani lo zaisle fi'o se jgira} is the closest equivalent, but it feels awkward and unnatural. Neither of these is a big cost to expressivity pe'i. On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 7:15 AM, gleki wrote: > Of course I know that Pandunia lacks other nice features. > I want Lojban to be the best in every feature, not most features. It's no= t a > competition. > The victory over other logical projects must be total. > > The question is similar to recent discussion about {kakne} - x1 is capabl= e > of {x2} which accomplishes the requirement of pivotal sentences whereas m= any > other gismu do not. > {mi cpedu lonu do rinsa [ko'a,zo'e,lo prenu, etc.]} is not the answer. It= 's > too ambiguous. Where is x3 ? Who are you asking this for ? > It's like {mi kakne lo nu do rinsa mi} - an impractical solution that cou= ld > be=A0logically possible. > Compare with {djica} - {mi djica=A0lo nu do rinsa mi} - that *is* within = the > baseline. > > The major flaw in Lojban is that it cannot compactly express "I ask you t= o > greet me". You have to say > {mi cpedu [fe] lo nu do rinsa [ku] [fi] do} > And here is the lack of compactness (two valsi {do} instead of one). > Even English (not Pandunia !) is better.=A0"I ask you to greet me" - > absolutely no need to repeat the word "you". > > > SO THE MAJOR FLAW OF LOJBAN IS THE LACK OF CONNECTION BETWEEN SUMTI in ma= ny > gismu. > I can see only one solution. > {mi cpedu fi do poi rinsa} therefore completely ignoring x2 (the act of > ignoring at least won't break the baseline). > But I'm not sure whether it preserves the needed meaning. > > On Friday, March 16, 2012 10:31:11 AM UTC+4, Oleksii Melnyk wrote: >> >> >> On 15 March 2012 18:10, gleki wrote: >>> >>> So the second "sumti" ti in mi peti ti=A0becomes the first "sumti" of t= he >>> next construction "ti tshau ta". >>> I wonder whether it's possible to do so in Lojban. May {be} or {.i ri} >>> can do the trick >> >> >> >Pandunia ... lacks other complex grammatical structures ... >> >> while lojban mandates them. So, in that example, it's hard to ?factor? t= he >> sumti out of the abstraction. In some specific cases you can get close >> enough with: >> >> 1. common set of sumti with 2 =ABbridi tails=BB - with reversed order, c= ommon >> comes first >> 2. NOI, with the hardcoded semantic >> >> -- >> mi'e lex mu'o >> > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Lojban Beginners" group. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msg/lojban-beginners/-/uwkF_b01VvIJ. > To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/lojban-beginners?hl=3Den. --=20 mu'o mi'e .arpis. --=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= Lojban Beginners" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@= googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= -beginners?hl=3Den.