Received: from mail-we0-f189.google.com ([74.125.82.189]:46137) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1S8cCL-0000sr-08; Fri, 16 Mar 2012 11:48:25 -0700 Received: by wera1 with SMTP id a1sf3636945wer.16 for ; Fri, 16 Mar 2012 11:48:13 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=68egswO6CZ7tq+pLGY7Hd6+TpzUe826LoG+GXtI3Wh8=; b=a55rIY10NiFg58/M9PljbNUhCe2/Yu2fxwwmYUCRpkWH66wbODIOS9bz+a5sVmyTXi p+Y3/i76LWeM6YZSWTPk96yD1UHu9PDQN9VocfGTrznojJ81aeA7DadffNppEcIm3QkK vY0EhJjoFWpuPiSsbOMgkyqeHsT01e88dQpKY= Received: by 10.205.131.13 with SMTP id ho13mr297689bkc.8.1331923669696; Fri, 16 Mar 2012 11:47:49 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.204.33.141 with SMTP id h13ls5978879bkd.7.gmail; Fri, 16 Mar 2012 11:47:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.150.90 with SMTP id x26mr369733bkv.6.1331923668624; Fri, 16 Mar 2012 11:47:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.150.90 with SMTP id x26mr369732bkv.6.1331923668568; Fri, 16 Mar 2012 11:47:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-lpp01m010-f47.google.com (mail-lpp01m010-f47.google.com [209.85.215.47]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id ba12si7214461bkb.2.2012.03.16.11.47.48 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 16 Mar 2012 11:47:48 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of eyeonus@gmail.com designates 209.85.215.47 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.215.47; Received: by mail-lpp01m010-f47.google.com with SMTP id w12so5040264lag.34 for ; Fri, 16 Mar 2012 11:47:48 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.152.104.43 with SMTP id gb11mr2721131lab.8.1331923668312; Fri, 16 Mar 2012 11:47:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.152.148.225 with HTTP; Fri, 16 Mar 2012 11:47:48 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <2343119.814.1331896532433.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@ynkz21> References: <26361784.259.1331827845548.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@ynjw14> <2343119.814.1331896532433.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@ynkz21> Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2012 12:47:48 -0600 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban-beginners] Major flaw in Lojban ! (was:Pivotal sentences in Pandunia. How to express them in Lojban ?) From: Jonathan Jones To: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: eyeonus@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of eyeonus@gmail.com designates 209.85.215.47 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=eyeonus@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com; contact lojban-beginners+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 300742228892 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d040713dd1e23c804bb60a56b X-Spam-Score: -0.4 (/) X-Spam_score: -0.4 X-Spam_score_int: -3 X-Spam_bar: / --f46d040713dd1e23c804bb60a56b Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 5:15 AM, gleki wrote: > Of course I know that Pandunia lacks other nice features. > I want Lojban to be the best in every feature, not most features. It's not > a competition. > The victory over other logical projects must be total. > > The question is similar to recent discussion about {kakne} - x1 is capable > of {x2} which accomplishes the requirement of pivotal sentences whereas > many other gismu do not. > {mi cpedu lonu do rinsa [ko'a,zo'e,lo prenu, etc.]} is not the answer. > It's too ambiguous. Where is x3 ? Who are you asking this for ? > I don't agree that that is ambiguous. If I'm talking to a specific person, and I say that TO that specific person, I think context alone makes it quite clear that the elided cpedu3 is {do}. After all, who else is capable of causing the event of {do rinsa ko'a}, besides {do}? Nobody. Context alone therefore dictates that {lo te cpedu} must be {do}. It is true that being explicit in Lojban has the effect of making utterances longer, and that redundancies will occur, however, you don't HAVE to be explicit about everything, and leaving things to context when it is possible to do so tends to make Lojban utterances shorter than the natlang counterparts. A major advantage of Lojban - at least IMO - is that it is possible to leave quite a lot up to context- something which Asians languages (and possibly others, I don't know) have, but languages like English do not. -- mu'o mi'e .aionys. .i.e'ucai ko cmima lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi.luk. mi patfu do zo'o (Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. :D ) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lojban Beginners" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban-beginners?hl=en. --f46d040713dd1e23c804bb60a56b Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 5:15 AM, gleki <gleki.is.my.name= @gmail.com> wrote:
Of course I know that Pandunia lacks other nice features.
I want Lojban= to be the best in every feature, not most features. It's not a competi= tion.=A0
The victory over other logical projects must be total.

The question is similar to recent discussion about {kakne} - = x1 is capable of {x2} which accomplishes the requirement of pivotal sentenc= es whereas many other gismu do not.
{mi cpedu lonu do rinsa [ko&#= 39;a,zo'e,lo prenu, etc.]} is not the answer. It's too ambiguous. W= here is x3 ? Who are you asking this for ?

I don't agree that that is ambiguous. If I&= #39;m talking to a specific person, and I say that TO that specific person,= I think context alone makes it quite clear that the elided cpedu3 is {do}.=

After all, who else is capable of causing the event of {do rinsa ko'= ;a}, besides {do}? Nobody. Context alone therefore dictates that {lo te cpe= du} must be {do}.

It is true that being explicit in Lojban has the e= ffect of making utterances longer, and that redundancies will occur, howeve= r, you don't HAVE to be explicit about everything, and leaving things t= o context when it is possible to do so tends to make Lojban utterances shor= ter than the natlang counterparts.

A major advantage of Lojban - at least IMO - is that it is possible to= =20 leave quite a lot up to context- something which Asians languages (and=20 possibly others, I don't know) have, but languages like English do not.=

--
mu'o mi'e .aionys.

.i.e'ucai = ko cmima lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi.luk. mi patfu do zo'o
(Come to = the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. :D )

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= Lojban Beginners" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@= googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= -beginners?hl=3Den.
--f46d040713dd1e23c804bb60a56b--