On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 7:15 AM, MorphemeAdd= ict <lytlesw@gmai= l.com> wrote:

On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 a= t 9:10 AM, ianek <janek37@gmail.com> wrote:

On 20 Mar, 13:23, Jonathan Jones <eyeo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Well, in that case, I recommend cu, not ku. cu is actually easily elid= able,
> unlike ku. I believe we determined not long ago that in the worst case= , it
> would take a maximum of three terminators in the absence of cu to corr= ectly
> terminate a grammatical structure, and rarely more than one.

What a about {lo nu broda lo nu brode lo nu brodi lo nu brodo ku ku k= u
ku brodu}? Jbofi'e says that it needs at least these four {ku} if we want to avoid {cu}.
I like avoiding {cu}, but only when it doesn't require a string of
more than two terminators.

Maybe = the original meant three distinct terminators. You've used only = one, albeit four times.=A0

stevo=A0

mu 'o mi'e ianek

> cu is kind of like an optional half-.i, in that whereas .i implicitly = adds
> whatever terminators are required to end the previous sentence and beg= in a
> new one, cu does the same, but only up the point of the selbri (, and<= br> > please keep in mind that that is where my comparison ends- I doubt the= re
> are any other similarities between cu and .i).
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

> On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 5:38 AM, gleki <gleki.is.my.n...@gmail.com<= /a>> wrote:
> > Well. We are preparing a textbook that will teach how to speak lo= jban.
> > But this textbook must use as few words as possible.
> > I wanna get rid of all words that can be replaced by other words.=
>
> > It's a textbook for newbies. So don't worry. It will be a= n introduction to
> > Lojban.
>
> > On Monday, March 19, 2012 10:49:14 AM UTC+4, stevo wrote:
>
> >> Even if it is possible to eliminate {ku} in speech, why would= you want to?
>
> >> stevo
>

> >> On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 2:35 AM, gleki <gleki.is.my.n...@gmail.= com>wrote:

>
> >>> Is it possible to completely get rid of {ku} in speech ? = Can we
> >>> rearrange words in extreme cases and use other cmavo like= {kei} and {cu} ?
>
> >>> --
> >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to t= he Google
> >>> Groups "Lojban Beginners" group.

> >>> To view this discussion on the web visithttps://groups.google.com/= d/**
> >>> msg/lojban-beginners/-/**P3eUQjPdbJsJ<https://groups.google.com/d/msg/lojban-beginners/-/P3eUQjPdbJsJ><= br> > >>> .
> >>> To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@goo= glegroups.**com<lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com>

> >>> .
> >>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to

> >>> lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@**googlegroups.com<lojban-beginners%= 2Bunsubscr ibe@go= oglegroups.com>
> >>> .
> >>> For more options, visit this group athttp://groups.google.com/**
> >>> group/lojban-beginners?hl=3Den<http://group= s.google.com/group/lojban-beginners?hl=3Den>

> >>> .
>
> >> =A0--
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Googl= e Groups
> > "Lojban Beginners" group.
> > To view this discussion on the web visit
> >https://groups.google.com/d/msg/lojban-beginner= s/-/GaqDxupbMXQJ.
>
> > To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.co= m.
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
> > For more options, visit this group at
> >http://groups.google.com/group/lojban-beginners?hl=3Den= .
>
> --
> mu'o mi'e .aionys.
>
> .i.e'ucai ko cmima lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi.luk. mi patfu do zo= 'o
> (Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. :D )

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;Lojban Beginners" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban-beginners+un= subscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/g= roup/lojban-beginners?hl=3Den.