Received: from mail-yw0-f61.google.com ([209.85.213.61]:34591) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1SALNv-0002ab-9O; Wed, 21 Mar 2012 06:15:31 -0700 Received: by yhkk25 with SMTP id k25sf1404388yhk.16 for ; Wed, 21 Mar 2012 06:15:20 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:x-pair-authenticated:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post :list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe :content-type; bh=iBij2HMr7UwaSd0y0+zIBS6hIwDB+gRQRg0DPwIMsuU=; b=la9DhiE+kUV/Ef76MpEZkEvcCMGpj3iXMZ6VV3eW3UASoNvPT6SzlR6HwZ7hY2yxK7 pVt26KVVTg/4m5cZyWyZF3kN9jKky7ALIQh8CcF1CoJf1W1WECqDDhP4aMxSI4Fh4obc P1MqERYcxNrzwxMT2LqOdMOqZW2xNWazdWwXk= Received: by 10.50.36.164 with SMTP id r4mr998548igj.5.1332335698848; Wed, 21 Mar 2012 06:14:58 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.231.108.71 with SMTP id e7ls1330098ibp.0.gmail; Wed, 21 Mar 2012 06:14:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.43.53.73 with SMTP id vp9mr1944918icb.0.1332335697641; Wed, 21 Mar 2012 06:14:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.43.53.73 with SMTP id vp9mr1944916icb.0.1332335697573; Wed, 21 Mar 2012 06:14:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from relay03.pair.com (relay03.pair.com. [209.68.5.17]) by gmr-mx.google.com with SMTP id t9si445886igb.1.2012.03.21.06.14.56; Wed, 21 Mar 2012 06:14:56 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 209.68.5.17 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of m3o@plasmatix.com) client-ip=209.68.5.17; Received: (qmail 81956 invoked from network); 21 Mar 2012 13:14:56 -0000 Received: from 87.160.151.29 (HELO ?192.168.1.33?) (87.160.151.29) by relay03.pair.com with SMTP; 21 Mar 2012 13:14:56 -0000 X-pair-Authenticated: 87.160.151.29 Message-ID: <4F69D44F.9080305@plasmatix.com> Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2012 14:14:55 +0100 From: selpa'i User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:10.0.2) Gecko/20120216 Thunderbird/10.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [lojban-beginners] Re: Is it possible to completely get rid of {ku} in speech ? References: <24143939.1398.1332138901295.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@ynnk21> <2371108.1969.1332312889960.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@ynjl17> In-Reply-To: <2371108.1969.1332312889960.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@ynjl17> X-Original-Sender: m3o@plasmatix.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 209.68.5.17 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of m3o@plasmatix.com) smtp.mail=m3o@plasmatix.com Reply-To: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com; contact lojban-beginners+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 300742228892 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------010801010302070200030804" X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam_score: 0.0 X-Spam_score_int: 0 X-Spam_bar: / This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------010801010302070200030804 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed You may think it's easier without ku, but it will cause problems for the students later on. I strongly recommend teaching full terminators from the beginning on. Teach how to elide them a bit later. Trust the people here who tell you to teach terminators. We have a lot of experience teaching beginners and this method has proven effective again and again. Am 21.03.2012 07:54, schrieb gleki: > My point was to teach in the form of > {lo broda cu brode lo brodi lo brodo be lo brodu} > In this case student can learn only "lo". > Otherwise they will have to learn > {lo broda ku brode lo brodi ku lo brodo be lo brodu [ku ku]} > which is a bit more bulky and harder to understand. > > {lo} without looks like "a" or "the" in English. > {lo ... ku} looks like a programming language which is not easy for > everyone. > > On Monday, March 19, 2012 10:35:01 AM UTC+4, gleki wrote: > > Is it possible to completely get rid of {ku} in speech ? Can we > rearrange words in extreme cases and use other cmavo like {kei} > and {cu} ? > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "Lojban Beginners" group. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msg/lojban-beginners/-/jr0LeEnGOJUJ. > To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/lojban-beginners?hl=en. -- .i da xamgu ganse fi no na'ebo lo risna .i lo vajrai cu nonselji'u lo kanla -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lojban Beginners" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban-beginners?hl=en. --------------010801010302070200030804 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 You may think it's easier without ku, but it will cause problems for the students later on. I strongly recommend teaching full terminators from the beginning on. Teach how to elide them a bit later. Trust the people here who tell you to teach terminators. We have a lot of experience teaching beginners and this method has proven effective again and again.

Am 21.03.2012 07:54, schrieb gleki:
My point was to teach in the form of
{lo broda cu brode lo brodi lo brodo be lo brodu}
In this case student can learn only "lo".
Otherwise they will have to learn
{lo broda ku brode lo brodi ku lo brodo be lo brodu [ku ku]}
which is a bit more bulky and harder to understand.

{lo} without looks like "a" or "the" in English.
{lo ... ku} looks like a programming language which is not easy for everyone.

On Monday, March 19, 2012 10:35:01 AM UTC+4, gleki wrote:
Is it possible to completely get rid of {ku} in speech ? Can we rearrange words in extreme cases and use other cmavo like {kei} and {cu} ?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lojban Beginners" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/lojban-beginners/-/jr0LeEnGOJUJ.
To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban-beginners?hl=en.


-- 
.i da xamgu ganse fi no na'ebo lo risna 
.i lo vajrai cu nonselji'u lo kanla

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lojban Beginners" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban-beginners?hl=en.
--------------010801010302070200030804--