Received: from mail-yw0-f61.google.com ([209.85.213.61]:50527) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1SJ47O-0005D9-EW; Sat, 14 Apr 2012 07:38:30 -0700 Received: by yhkk25 with SMTP id k25sf3724789yhk.16 for ; Sat, 14 Apr 2012 07:38:20 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:date:from:to:message-id:subject:mime-version :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post :list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe :content-type; bh=E5mJlB6dgRowOOyhTeTesdYvdEyMIcfqNmzi2JhDOeM=; b=gZ78nDzKPBeWlG8zNcB2k8Ivp8U7sXhGix4IlmiWSzEzhUUsGfnkJjVHUOdGW8BLSO MEnpbjMOj7B9LDGL2VCWpU7QFXBD7HHprAIa58WfnItEgzJD2N/HuCBrZdFUa+WSvJ/+ 0/tppCABCyJ4xzwKF440yVJ5/XxWOZUqhx0D4= Received: by 10.68.218.103 with SMTP id pf7mr1222295pbc.11.1334414275400; Sat, 14 Apr 2012 07:37:55 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.68.223.72 with SMTP id qs8ls13981976pbc.6.gmail; Sat, 14 Apr 2012 07:37:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.68.211.225 with SMTP id nf1mr1248253pbc.13.1334414274965; Sat, 14 Apr 2012 07:37:54 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2012 07:37:54 -0700 (PDT) From: gleki To: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com Message-ID: <30880759.2.1334414274058.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@pbcgs4> Subject: [lojban-beginners] irrealis attitudinals (~propositional indicators) in subordinate clauses MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Original-Sender: gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: ls.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com designates internal as permitted sender) smtp.mail=gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com; contact lojban-beginners+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 300742228892 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_1_14015186.1334414274019" X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam_score: -0.7 X-Spam_score_int: -6 X-Spam_bar: / ------=_Part_1_14015186.1334414274019 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 We've an intersting discussion with la filipos. http://tatoeba.org/rus/sentences/show/1524503#comments Here is a copy of it. The sentence is "ko'a pu cusku lo se du'u ko'a ca .ei cliva". gleki: doi .filipos. don't you think that attitudinals like {.ei} can refer to the speaker only. In relative clauses it's not possible to use {.ei} refering to anyone described. What is your opinion about just {bilga} or at least careful usage {of .eida'oi} Attitudinals express true emotions which you can never be sure about other people. filipos: doi gleki I think irrealis attitudinals (~propositional indicators) in subordinate clauses should be considered part of them. For one thing, giving short scope to attitudinals in general means they providing equal expressive power to main bridi and abstraction bridi. More importantly, for the particular case of irrealis, I see no general useful alternative interpretation. So, {ko'a ca .ei cliva} "ko'a should leave now" {lo du'u ko'a ca .ei cliva} "The proposition " {lo se du'u ko'a ca .ei cliva} "A sentence expressing that koha should leave now" You could use {bilga} in an alternative translation. {da'oi} does not help if you think that {.ei} has long scope. Irrealis attitudinals are a fundamental part of what is being stated, not a side emotional expression like {.ui}. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lojban Beginners" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/lojban-beginners/-/b93oXtl_SQMJ. To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban-beginners?hl=en. ------=_Part_1_14015186.1334414274019 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
We've an intersting discussion with la filipos. 
http://tat= oeba.org/rus/sentences/show/1524503#comments 

Here is a copy of it.
The sentence is "ko'a pu cusku lo = se du'u ko'a ca .ei cliva".

gleki:
doi .filipos.
don't you think that attitudinals like = {.ei} can refer to the speaker only.
In relative clauses it's not possible to use= {.ei} refering to anyone described.

What is your opinion about just {bilga} or at least carefu= l usage {of .eida'oi}

doi gleki<= /div>

I think irrealis attitudina= ls (~propositional indicators) in subordinate clauses should be considered = part of them. For one thing, giving short scope to attitudinals in general = means they providing equal expressive power to main bridi and abstraction b= ridi. More importantly, for the particular case of irrealis, I see no gener= al useful alternative interpretation.

So,
{ko'a ca .ei cliva} "ko'a should leave now"
{lo du'u ko'a ca .ei = cliva} "The proposition <koha should leave now>"
{lo se du'u ko'a ca .ei cl= iva} "A sentence expressing that koha should leave now"
You could use {bilga} in an alternative= translation. {da'oi} does not help if you think that {.ei} has long scope.=

<= div>Irrealis attitudina= ls are a fundamental part of what is being stated, not a side emotional exp= ression like {.ui}. 

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= Lojban Beginners" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/l= ojban-beginners/-/b93oXtl_SQMJ.
=20 To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@= googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= -beginners?hl=3Den.
------=_Part_1_14015186.1334414274019--