Received: from mail-ee0-f61.google.com ([74.125.83.61]:48743) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1SSC5J-00069b-LM; Wed, 09 May 2012 11:58:02 -0700 Received: by eeke50 with SMTP id e50sf420688eek.16 for ; Wed, 09 May 2012 11:57:54 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=GrqeCUAupytqRYClliggEXrAgnFZcWMnewlP28teCh4=; b=wvotoP1atZSIfaoMZReD4aN0YoXTwr495gBam6qRVM3VEoF142GvEB8qQc5R1ApV4J I4efH0us76+exZlhqWoL7F6v2opWGE8h7vZugUbraVxywBnLKHiLAPJSboL/GuuvUtDo Wksl3dyg3SvC+gnRkkQcDopJhyxXSPRe5KwJw= Received: by 10.204.153.205 with SMTP id l13mr84232bkw.15.1336589873740; Wed, 09 May 2012 11:57:53 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.204.130.145 with SMTP id t17ls4347161bks.8.gmail; Wed, 09 May 2012 11:57:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.143.143 with SMTP id v15mr173978bku.8.1336589871661; Wed, 09 May 2012 11:57:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.143.143 with SMTP id v15mr173976bku.8.1336589871636; Wed, 09 May 2012 11:57:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-bk0-f54.google.com (mail-bk0-f54.google.com [209.85.214.54]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id k15si4069463bks.0.2012.05.09.11.57.51 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 09 May 2012 11:57:51 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of mturniansky@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.54 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.214.54; Received: by mail-bk0-f54.google.com with SMTP id i17so787390bkv.13 for ; Wed, 09 May 2012 11:57:51 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.131.65 with SMTP id w1mr497461bks.41.1336589871467; Wed, 09 May 2012 11:57:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.205.125.5 with HTTP; Wed, 9 May 2012 11:57:51 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <201205080025.44688.phma@phma.optus.nu> <12872840.1048.1336566301897.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@ynjb15> <3f2be27f-7c0e-459f-9b8a-f0a3b401cfb1@l15g2000vbv.googlegroups.com> Date: Wed, 9 May 2012 14:57:51 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban-beginners] Re: Reuse request From: Michael Turniansky To: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: mturniansky@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of mturniansky@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.54 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=mturniansky@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com; contact lojban-beginners+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 300742228892 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00151747c1487fcd9704bf9f142c X-Spam-Score: 2.8 (++) X-Spam_score: 2.8 X-Spam_score_int: 28 X-Spam_bar: ++ X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "stodi.digitalkingdom.org", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 10:52 AM, Jonathan Jones wrote: > On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 8:31 AM, Michael Turniansky wrote: > >> . >> > > If you don't believe that you can own a pet, that's okay, that just >> means "la clalis ponse lo mlatu na'e bo la aionys" :-) >> (in any case, you're okay here, because "se dalpe'o" works, too. >> >> --gejyspa >> > > I think the relationship between a pet and it's caretaker is a unique bond > that has similarities to the relationship between a person and his friends, > and boss and her subordinates, and a person and his property, but is not > truly the same as any of these. But that's not really important, as it's a > philosophical opinion and we're discussing grammar. > > I agree. You're the one that said you didn't want to use "ponse" because of your philosophy. I merely point out that the te ponse enables you to limit the universe of who recognizes this ownership. In the eyes of the majority of cultures and governments, you can ponse lo dalpe'o. In some cultures, you can ponse lo gunka. In some, you can ponse lo fetspe, and in some, you can ponse lo panzi. But like I said, you can use "se dalpe'o", be uncontroversial and true to your philosophy. [...] Content analysis details: (2.8 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (mturniansky[at]gmail.com) -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [74.125.83.61 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED No valid author signature, adsp_override is CUSTOM_MED -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 FUZZY_CPILL BODY: Attempt to obfuscate words in spam 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature 1.3 DRUGS_ERECTILE_OBFU Obfuscated reference to an erectile drug 2.2 DRUGS_ERECTILE Refers to an erectile drug --00151747c1487fcd9704bf9f142c Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 10:52 AM, Jonathan Jones wrote: > On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 8:31 AM, Michael Turniansky wrote: > >> . >> > > If you don't believe that you can own a pet, that's okay, that just >> means "la clalis ponse lo mlatu na'e bo la aionys" :-) >> (in any case, you're okay here, because "se dalpe'o" works, too. >> >> --gejyspa >> > > I think the relationship between a pet and it's caretaker is a unique bond > that has similarities to the relationship between a person and his friends, > and boss and her subordinates, and a person and his property, but is not > truly the same as any of these. But that's not really important, as it's a > philosophical opinion and we're discussing grammar. > > I agree. You're the one that said you didn't want to use "ponse" because of your philosophy. I merely point out that the te ponse enables you to limit the universe of who recognizes this ownership. In the eyes of the majority of cultures and governments, you can ponse lo dalpe'o. In some cultures, you can ponse lo gunka. In some, you can ponse lo fetspe, and in some, you can ponse lo panzi. But like I said, you can use "se dalpe'o", be uncontroversial and true to your philosophy. --gejyspa -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lojban Beginners" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban-beginners?hl=en. --00151747c1487fcd9704bf9f142c Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


On Wed, May 9, 2012 at = 10:52 AM, Jonathan Jones <eyeonus@gmail.com> wrote:
On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 8:31 AM= , Michael Turniansky <mturniansky@gmail.com> wrote:
<= blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px= #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
.

=A0 =A0If you don't believe that you c= an own a pet, that's okay, that just means "la clalis ponse lo mla= tu na'e bo la aionys" =A0:-)
=A0 =A0(in any case, you're okay here, because "se dalpe'= o" works, too.

=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0--gejyspa

I think the relationship between a pet and it's caretaker is a unique= =20 bond that has similarities to the relationship between a person and his=20 friends, and boss and her subordinates, and a person and his property,=20 but is not truly the same as any of these. But that's not really=20 important, as it's a philosophical opinion and we're discussing gra= mmar.


=A0 I agree. =A0You're the one that= said you didn't want to use "ponse" because of your philosop= hy. =A0I merely point out that the te ponse enables you to limit the univer= se of who recognizes this ownership. =A0In the eyes of the =A0majority of c= ultures and governments, you can ponse lo dalpe'o. =A0In some cultures,= you can ponse lo gunka. =A0In some, you can ponse lo fetspe, and in some, = you can ponse lo panzi. =A0But like I said, you can use "se dalpe'= o", be uncontroversial and true to your philosophy. =A0

=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 --gejyspa

<= /div>

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= Lojban Beginners" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@= googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= -beginners?hl=3Den.
--00151747c1487fcd9704bf9f142c--