Received: from mail-lb0-f189.google.com ([209.85.217.189]:52486) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1STBHp-0005Op-Fc; Sat, 12 May 2012 05:19:05 -0700 Received: by lbol5 with SMTP id l5sf2052960lbo.16 for ; Sat, 12 May 2012 05:18:53 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=HBHD7+lkXi7RFLBdoBDGeUuxfB0mPcdiDEf5mA+0xY0=; b=PZxy46z2y/0UahmYv9NtN6MktCrUNYuBZ3jH1LFl2KHMrdroOgstIf81nAc8pRlQkr e3BRaKUEuKlUqKFrKhPeRh618onj3r3a+Z7h9fFpQyY85+9Omc5ACHlYkHV8Lu83sapo fuJm3glOOlwg25LSBFFW284wUU9wzcI+ZrHxs= Received: by 10.204.150.91 with SMTP id x27mr31420bkv.18.1336825132966; Sat, 12 May 2012 05:18:52 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.204.8.149 with SMTP id h21ls6022161bkh.3.gmail; Sat, 12 May 2012 05:18:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.154.133 with SMTP id o5mr170138bkw.0.1336825131995; Sat, 12 May 2012 05:18:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.154.133 with SMTP id o5mr170137bkw.0.1336825131973; Sat, 12 May 2012 05:18:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-lpp01m010-f50.google.com (mail-lpp01m010-f50.google.com [209.85.215.50]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id p5si14735816bks.1.2012.05.12.05.18.51 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sat, 12 May 2012 05:18:51 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of eyeonus@gmail.com designates 209.85.215.50 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.215.50; Received: by lahm15 with SMTP id m15so2972932lah.23 for ; Sat, 12 May 2012 05:18:51 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.112.99.71 with SMTP id eo7mr688118lbb.84.1336825131586; Sat, 12 May 2012 05:18:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.152.22.68 with HTTP; Sat, 12 May 2012 05:18:51 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <201205080025.44688.phma@phma.optus.nu> <12872840.1048.1336566301897.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@ynjb15> <3f2be27f-7c0e-459f-9b8a-f0a3b401cfb1@l15g2000vbv.googlegroups.com> Date: Sat, 12 May 2012 06:18:51 -0600 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban-beginners] Re: Reuse request From: Jonathan Jones To: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: eyeonus@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of eyeonus@gmail.com designates 209.85.215.50 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=eyeonus@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com; contact lojban-beginners+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 300742228892 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d04016a231855ca04bfd5db0d X-Spam-Score: 0.1 (/) X-Spam_score: 0.1 X-Spam_score_int: 1 X-Spam_bar: / X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "stodi.digitalkingdom.org", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 5:22 AM, Jonathan Jones wrote: > On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 5:02 AM, Felipe Gonçalves Assis < > felipeg.assis@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On 11 May 2012 17:43, Jonathan Jones wrote: >> > On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 2:41 PM, Jonathan Jones >> wrote: >> >> >> >> #41. lu'o mi .e la.djan. .e la snime .e la.flyfis. lu'u kansi'u xabju >> lo >> >> vu cmalu zdani >> > >> >> I may have missed something, but, is there any specific reason for not >> using >> plain {jo'u} (or {joi})? > > > Not really, no. It was just easier to add two words than to change three. > [...] Content analysis details: (0.1 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.8 SINGLE_HEADER_3K A single header contains 3K-4K characters 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (eyeonus[at]gmail.com) -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [209.85.217.189 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED No valid author signature, adsp_override is CUSTOM_MED -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature --f46d04016a231855ca04bfd5db0d Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 5:22 AM, Jonathan Jones wrote: > On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 5:02 AM, Felipe Gon=E7alves Assis < > felipeg.assis@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On 11 May 2012 17:43, Jonathan Jones wrote: >> > On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 2:41 PM, Jonathan Jones >> wrote: >> >> >> >> #41. lu'o mi .e la.djan. .e la snime .e la.flyfis. lu'u kansi'u xabju >> lo >> >> vu cmalu zdani >> > >> >> I may have missed something, but, is there any specific reason for not >> using >> plain {jo'u} (or {joi})? > > > Not really, no. It was just easier to add two words than to change three. > It does have the side-benefit of showing that there are multiple ways to say the same thing, as I do use joi for the same purpose in a different jufra. --=20 mu'o mi'e .aionys. .i.e'ucai ko cmima lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi.luk. mi patfu do zo'o (Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. :D ) --=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= Lojban Beginners" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@= googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= -beginners?hl=3Den. --f46d04016a231855ca04bfd5db0d Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 5:22 AM, Jonathan Jones = <eyeonus@gmail.com> wrote:
On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 5:02 AM, Felipe Gon=E7al= ves Assis <felipeg.assis@gmail.com> wrote:
On 11 May 2012 17:43, Jonathan Jones <eyeonus@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 2:41 PM, Jonathan Jones <eyeonus@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> #41. lu'o mi .e la.djan. .e la snime .e la.flyfis. lu'u ka= nsi'u xabju lo
>> vu cmalu zdani
>

I may have missed something, but, is there any specific reason for no= t using
plain {jo'u} (or {joi})?

Not really, no. It was j= ust easier to add two words than to change three.

It does have the side-benefit of showi= ng that there are multiple ways to say the same thing, as I do use joi for = the same purpose in a different jufra.

--
mu'o= mi'e .aionys.

.i.e'ucai ko cmima lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi.luk. mi patfu do zo&= #39;o
(Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. :D )

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= Lojban Beginners" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@= googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= -beginners?hl=3Den.
--f46d04016a231855ca04bfd5db0d--