Received: from mail-wg0-f61.google.com ([74.125.82.61]:48403) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1Skcch-0005Lg-Ul; Fri, 29 Jun 2012 07:56:41 -0700 Received: by wgbdt10 with SMTP id dt10sf1967383wgb.16 for ; Fri, 29 Jun 2012 07:56:32 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=av4b96BGvCybWRprGpzcZNCIJlYF1m41DMXEponuheM=; b=xLnFmnv17+KZ2qhmesgh8B4b/stcKpVopV63NkICWLKGXEQtAYxJNZWkNHC1jTqR9K IagB1xiqpUldqk9SqbeZ29aSCKIPPRXQ+QK1EFTwqP7voIVA8T62sL3uZH9hgePdm8bZ Vgc+ZSxCRXurmIcpJFXPTDeyhFinrjZMrs7I4= Received: by 10.204.129.7 with SMTP id m7mr82674bks.32.1340981791875; Fri, 29 Jun 2012 07:56:31 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.204.154.21 with SMTP id m21ls3867085bkw.2.gmail; Fri, 29 Jun 2012 07:56:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.143.145 with SMTP id v17mr311391bku.7.1340981791001; Fri, 29 Jun 2012 07:56:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.143.145 with SMTP id v17mr311390bku.7.1340981790974; Fri, 29 Jun 2012 07:56:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-bk0-f44.google.com (mail-bk0-f44.google.com [209.85.214.44]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id iv15si2275818bkc.0.2012.06.29.07.56.30 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 29 Jun 2012 07:56:30 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of mturniansky@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.44 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.214.44; Received: by mail-bk0-f44.google.com with SMTP id y8so3341655bkt.31 for ; Fri, 29 Jun 2012 07:56:30 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.205.126.8 with SMTP id gu8mr1218781bkc.61.1340981790744; Fri, 29 Jun 2012 07:56:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.205.125.5 with HTTP; Fri, 29 Jun 2012 07:56:30 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <201206281700.03463.phma@phma.optus.nu> Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2012 10:56:30 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban-beginners] Visual mem for pinxe on Memrise. From: Michael Turniansky To: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: mturniansky@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of mturniansky@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.44 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=mturniansky@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com; contact lojban-beginners+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 300742228892 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001517476292499fdf04c39da75e X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam_score: -0.7 X-Spam_score_int: -6 X-Spam_bar: / --001517476292499fdf04c39da75e Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 No, that's the problem. Without the simxu, nothing is explicit. All we know is that "we" are living with someone, not who. Yes, it is IMPLICIT that if A is living with X and B is also living with X then A is living with B (although one can certainly contrive situations where that is not true) The simxu makes explicit that it is reflexive -- we are living with each other. BTW, the reason (and again, I am conjecturing here) that Xorxes may prefer kansi'u to kansa in most cases is perhaps he perceives it as implying that lo kansa is subordinate to lo se kansa, in that the se kansa is the one that is actually the x1 of the lo te kansa, and lo kansa is simply a "hanger-on". (similar to a sidju relationship) --gejyspa On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 10:49 AM, Jonathan Jones wrote: > On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 7:34 AM, Michael Turniansky > wrote: > >> ...Without "simxu", it means "we are accompanying-type-of-living", whihc >> might mean we are as a group living with someone ELSE.... >> > > That's not really a problem, IMO. While it may be true that the sentence > exactly as is, but without simxu, implies that lo go'i may be living with > others, it's only explicit that lo go'i ARE, and in this case, the > implication is true, since they are living with their pets and children as > well, as we are told later in the comic. > > -- > mu'o mi'e .aionys. > > .i.e'ucai ko cmima lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi.luk. mi patfu do zo'o > (Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. :D ) > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Lojban Beginners" group. > To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/lojban-beginners?hl=en. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lojban Beginners" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban-beginners?hl=en. --001517476292499fdf04c39da75e Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
No, that's the problem. =A0Without the simxu, nothing = is explicit. =A0All we know is that "we" are living with someone,= not who. Yes, it is IMPLICIT that if A is living with X and B is also livi= ng with X then A is living with B (although one can certainly contrive situ= ations where that is not true) =A0The simxu makes explicit that it is refle= xive -- we are living with each other.

=A0 BTW, the reason (and again, I am conjecturing here) that= Xorxes may prefer kansi'u to kansa in most cases is perhaps he perceiv= es it as implying that lo kansa is =A0subordinate to lo se kansa, in that t= he se kansa is the one that is actually the x1 of the lo te kansa, and lo k= ansa is simply a "hanger-on". (similar to a =A0sidju relationship= )
=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 = =A0 --gejyspa


On Fri, Jun 29, = 2012 at 10:49 AM, Jonathan Jones <eyeonus@gmail.com> wrote:<= br>
On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 7:34 AM, Michael Tur= niansky <mturniansky@gmail.com> wrote:
...Without "simxu", it means "we are accomp= anying-type-of-living", whihc might mean we are as a group living with= someone ELSE....

That's not really a pr= oblem, IMO. While it may be true that the sentence exactly as is, but witho= ut simxu, implies that lo go'i may be living with others, it's only= explicit that lo go'i ARE, and in this case, the implication is true, = since they are living with their pets and children as well, as we are told = later in the comic.

--
mu'o mi&= #39;e .aionys.

.i.e'ucai ko cmima lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi.lu= k. mi patfu do zo'o
(Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. := D )

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;Lojban Beginners" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban-beginners+un= subscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/g= roup/lojban-beginners?hl=3Den.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= Lojban Beginners" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@= googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= -beginners?hl=3Den.
--001517476292499fdf04c39da75e--