Received: from mail-qa0-f56.google.com ([209.85.216.56]:56814) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1Snnm9-00044C-7L; Sun, 08 Jul 2012 02:27:36 -0700 Received: by qaas11 with SMTP id s11sf2521122qaa.1 for ; Sun, 08 Jul 2012 02:27:26 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:date:from:to:message-id:in-reply-to:references:subject :mime-version:x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results :reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-google-group-id :list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=GvPNAFjiM2Q8P6umJQWbrZONYpfcSBVbei2hN4FNpj8=; b=FeiJGYTxFJRMvLWak4i2OB11f+kt6RDCiYt29jZ78KGoqyyzx26vQvRMy11Qzyc29L zAdRrVI1Yp2D+4Hq2RiKez8KWQHt5Zy0AteciJ2nHfvB1Netm1pYQe88mcBFRVH/H6xh 47J4ekBj2z1PmF5k2TwD1Y8cu9KDRWGKawRZM= Received: by 10.68.216.163 with SMTP id or3mr2814014pbc.1.1341739646354; Sun, 08 Jul 2012 02:27:26 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.68.233.8 with SMTP id ts8ls7649083pbc.7.gmail; Sun, 08 Jul 2012 02:27:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.68.216.163 with SMTP id or3mr2814013pbc.1.1341739645876; Sun, 08 Jul 2012 02:27:25 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 8 Jul 2012 02:27:25 -0700 (PDT) From: gleki To: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com Message-Id: <3e6b32fd-f41e-4dea-8643-f802c422487f@googlegroups.com> In-Reply-To: References: <1897ed28-8a5d-4a2c-8916-8bad921c8240@googlegroups.com> <6530ad91-ce67-4926-b2e8-697ca6a39a36@googlegroups.com> <520a9835-280f-4d26-8d85-4d051f8acc18@googlegroups.com> Subject: Re: [lojban-beginners] Re: zo'oi pomegranate se fanva fu ma MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Original-Sender: gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: ls.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com designates internal as permitted sender) smtp.mail=gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com; contact lojban-beginners+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 300742228892 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_198_10519161.1341739645119" X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam_score: -0.7 X-Spam_score_int: -6 X-Spam_bar: / ------=_Part_198_10519161.1341739645119 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Sunday, July 8, 2012 1:03:19 PM UTC+4, tsani wrote: > > Er, no? If you mean my "No", i was replying to this phrase "It might be so that taxonomists can't figure out what to call this thing or that thing, but they will eventually come to some kind of conclusion," only. I can agree with the rest, though The rationale behind using -e and not -u is that the final > vowel from the fu'ivla head is -e and because in latin, the final > vowel is not really a true constituent of the *word*. The root itself > ends in a consonant, and therefore the final vowel has little real > bearing on the meaning, aside from grammatical implications. So no, > this isn't a malgli fu'ivla at all, especially considering that in > English, the word doesn't even end in a vowel (in speech, of course), > so "pomegranate" is lojbanised to {pamygranet} (probably, I'm no > expert on lojbanisation; I prefer to use real lojban words over > lojbanisations any day). > > What'd be unjustifiably malglico would be {grutrpamagranete} and that > certainly isn't the case with {grutrgranate} which is justified in all > aspects. > mu'o mi'e la tsani > > On 8 July 2012 03:49, Lindar wrote: > > In all honesty my biggest complaint is the nagging idea that you prefer > > {granate} to {granatu} and named it thus because of the English name for > the > > item and not the linnean name as is customary. It's my own weird > > twitch-reaction, but I'm going to cry malglitarmi on this simply for the > > fact that it is anything more than vaguely similar. It has nothing to do > > with a preferred final vowel and everything to do with the fact that > you're > > making stuff look like English because you speak English. > > > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups > > "Lojban Beginners" group. > > To view this discussion on the web visit > > https://groups.google.com/d/msg/lojban-beginners/-/TX1byiv8jRMJ. > > > > To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com. > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. > > For more options, visit this group at > > http://groups.google.com/group/lojban-beginners?hl=en. > On Sunday, July 8, 2012 1:03:19 PM UTC+4, tsani wrote: > > Er, no? The rationale behind using -e and not -u is that the final > vowel from the fu'ivla head is -e and because in latin, the final > vowel is not really a true constituent of the *word*. The root itself > ends in a consonant, and therefore the final vowel has little real > bearing on the meaning, aside from grammatical implications. So no, > this isn't a malgli fu'ivla at all, especially considering that in > English, the word doesn't even end in a vowel (in speech, of course), > so "pomegranate" is lojbanised to {pamygranet} (probably, I'm no > expert on lojbanisation; I prefer to use real lojban words over > lojbanisations any day). > > What'd be unjustifiably malglico would be {grutrpamagranete} and that > certainly isn't the case with {grutrgranate} which is justified in all > aspects. > > mu'o mi'e la tsani > > On 8 July 2012 03:49, Lindar wrote: > > In all honesty my biggest complaint is the nagging idea that you prefer > > {granate} to {granatu} and named it thus because of the English name for > the > > item and not the linnean name as is customary. It's my own weird > > twitch-reaction, but I'm going to cry malglitarmi on this simply for the > > fact that it is anything more than vaguely similar. It has nothing to do > > with a preferred final vowel and everything to do with the fact that > you're > > making stuff look like English because you speak English. > > > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups > > "Lojban Beginners" group. > > To view this discussion on the web visit > > https://groups.google.com/d/msg/lojban-beginners/-/TX1byiv8jRMJ. > > > > To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com. > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. > > For more options, visit this group at > > http://groups.google.com/group/lojban-beginners?hl=en. > On Sunday, July 8, 2012 1:03:19 PM UTC+4, tsani wrote: > > Er, no? The rationale behind using -e and not -u is that the final > vowel from the fu'ivla head is -e and because in latin, the final > vowel is not really a true constituent of the *word*. The root itself > ends in a consonant, and therefore the final vowel has little real > bearing on the meaning, aside from grammatical implications. So no, > this isn't a malgli fu'ivla at all, especially considering that in > English, the word doesn't even end in a vowel (in speech, of course), > so "pomegranate" is lojbanised to {pamygranet} (probably, I'm no > expert on lojbanisation; I prefer to use real lojban words over > lojbanisations any day). > > What'd be unjustifiably malglico would be {grutrpamagranete} and that > certainly isn't the case with {grutrgranate} which is justified in all > aspects. > > mu'o mi'e la tsani > > On 8 July 2012 03:49, Lindar wrote: > > In all honesty my biggest complaint is the nagging idea that you prefer > > {granate} to {granatu} and named it thus because of the English name for > the > > item and not the linnean name as is customary. It's my own weird > > twitch-reaction, but I'm going to cry malglitarmi on this simply for the > > fact that it is anything more than vaguely similar. It has nothing to do > > with a preferred final vowel and everything to do with the fact that > you're > > making stuff look like English because you speak English. > > > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups > > "Lojban Beginners" group. > > To view this discussion on the web visit > > https://groups.google.com/d/msg/lojban-beginners/-/TX1byiv8jRMJ. > > > > To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com. > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. > > For more options, visit this group at > > http://groups.google.com/group/lojban-beginners?hl=en. > On Sunday, July 8, 2012 1:03:19 PM UTC+4, tsani wrote: > > Er, no? The rationale behind using -e and not -u is that the final > vowel from the fu'ivla head is -e and because in latin, the final > vowel is not really a true constituent of the *word*. The root itself > ends in a consonant, and therefore the final vowel has little real > bearing on the meaning, aside from grammatical implications. So no, > this isn't a malgli fu'ivla at all, especially considering that in > English, the word doesn't even end in a vowel (in speech, of course), > so "pomegranate" is lojbanised to {pamygranet} (probably, I'm no > expert on lojbanisation; I prefer to use real lojban words over > lojbanisations any day). > > What'd be unjustifiably malglico would be {grutrpamagranete} and that > certainly isn't the case with {grutrgranate} which is justified in all > aspects. > > mu'o mi'e la tsani > > On 8 July 2012 03:49, Lindar wrote: > > In all honesty my biggest complaint is the nagging idea that you prefer > > {granate} to {granatu} and named it thus because of the English name for > the > > item and not the linnean name as is customary. It's my own weird > > twitch-reaction, but I'm going to cry malglitarmi on this simply for the > > fact that it is anything more than vaguely similar. It has nothing to do > > with a preferred final vowel and everything to do with the fact that > you're > > making stuff look like English because you speak English. > > > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups > > "Lojban Beginners" group. > > To view this discussion on the web visit > > https://groups.google.com/d/msg/lojban-beginners/-/TX1byiv8jRMJ. > > > > To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com. > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. > > For more options, visit this group at > > http://groups.google.com/group/lojban-beginners?hl=en. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lojban Beginners" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/lojban-beginners/-/D1gRf7b-jVMJ. To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban-beginners?hl=en. ------=_Part_198_10519161.1341739645119 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Sunday, July 8, 2012 1:03:19 PM UTC+4, tsani wrote:
Er, no?

If = you mean my "No", i was replying to this phrase "It might be so that taxonomists can't figure out what to call= this 
thing or that thing, but they will even= tually come to some kind of 
conclusion," only.
I can agree with the rest, though

The rationale behind using -e and not -u = is that the final
vowel from the fu'ivla head is -e and because in latin, the final
vowel is not really a true constituent of the *word*. The root itself
ends in a consonant, and therefore the final vowel has little real
bearing on the meaning, aside from grammatical implications. So no,
this isn't a malgli fu'ivla at all, especially considering that in
English, the word doesn't even end in a vowel (in speech, of course),
so "pomegranate" is lojbanised to {pamygranet} (probably, I'm no
expert on lojbanisation; I prefer to use real lojban words over
lojbanisations any day).

What'd be unjustifiably malglico would be {grutrpamagranete} and that
certainly isn't the case with {grutrgranate} which is justified in all
aspects.  

mu'o mi'e la tsani

On 8 July 2012 03:49, Lindar <lindarthebard@gmail.com> wrote:
> In all honesty my biggest complaint is the nagging idea that you p= refer
> {granate} to {granatu} and named it thus because of the English na= me for the
> item and not the linnean name as is customary. It's my own weird
> twitch-reaction, but I'm going to cry malglitarmi on this simply f= or the
> fact that it is anything more than vaguely similar. It has nothing= to do
> with a preferred final vowel and everything to do with the fact th= at you're
> making stuff look like English because you speak English.
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google= Groups
> "Lojban Beginners" group.
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msg/lojban-beg= inners/-/TX1byiv8jRMJ.
>
> To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/lojban-beginners?hl= =3Den.

On Sunday, July 8, 2012 1:03:19 PM UTC+4, tsani wrote:=
Er, no? The rationale behind u= sing -e and not -u is that the final
vowel from the fu'ivla head is -e and because in latin, the final
vowel is not really a true constituent of the *word*. The root itself
ends in a consonant, and therefore the final vowel has little real
bearing on the meaning, aside from grammatical implications. So no,
this isn't a malgli fu'ivla at all, especially considering that in
English, the word doesn't even end in a vowel (in speech, of course),
so "pomegranate" is lojbanised to {pamygranet} (probably, I'm no
expert on lojbanisation; I prefer to use real lojban words over
lojbanisations any day).

What'd be unjustifiably malglico would be {grutrpamagranete} and that
certainly isn't the case with {grutrgranate} which is justified in all
aspects.

mu'o mi'e la tsani

On 8 July 2012 03:49, Lindar <lindarthebard@gmail.com> wrote:
> In all honesty my biggest complaint is the nagging idea that you p= refer
> {granate} to {granatu} and named it thus because of the English na= me for the
> item and not the linnean name as is customary. It's my own weird
> twitch-reaction, but I'm going to cry malglitarmi on this simply f= or the
> fact that it is anything more than vaguely similar. It has nothing= to do
> with a preferred final vowel and everything to do with the fact th= at you're
> making stuff look like English because you speak English.
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google= Groups
> "Lojban Beginners" group.
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msg/lojban-beg= inners/-/TX1byiv8jRMJ.
>
> To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/lojban-beginners?hl= =3Den.

On Sunday, July 8, 2012 1:03:19 PM UTC+4, tsani wrote:=
Er, no? The rationale behind u= sing -e and not -u is that the final
vowel from the fu'ivla head is -e and because in latin, the final
vowel is not really a true constituent of the *word*. The root itself
ends in a consonant, and therefore the final vowel has little real
bearing on the meaning, aside from grammatical implications. So no,
this isn't a malgli fu'ivla at all, especially considering that in
English, the word doesn't even end in a vowel (in speech, of course),
so "pomegranate" is lojbanised to {pamygranet} (probably, I'm no
expert on lojbanisation; I prefer to use real lojban words over
lojbanisations any day).

What'd be unjustifiably malglico would be {grutrpamagranete} and that
certainly isn't the case with {grutrgranate} which is justified in all
aspects.

mu'o mi'e la tsani

On 8 July 2012 03:49, Lindar <lindarthebard@gmail.com> wrote:
> In all honesty my biggest complaint is the nagging idea that you p= refer
> {granate} to {granatu} and named it thus because of the English na= me for the
> item and not the linnean name as is customary. It's my own weird
> twitch-reaction, but I'm going to cry malglitarmi on this simply f= or the
> fact that it is anything more than vaguely similar. It has nothing= to do
> with a preferred final vowel and everything to do with the fact th= at you're
> making stuff look like English because you speak English.
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google= Groups
> "Lojban Beginners" group.
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msg/lojban-beg= inners/-/TX1byiv8jRMJ.
>
> To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/lojban-beginners?hl= =3Den.

On Sunday, July 8, 2012 1:03:19 PM UTC+4, tsani wrote:=
Er, no? The rationale behind u= sing -e and not -u is that the final
vowel from the fu'ivla head is -e and because in latin, the final
vowel is not really a true constituent of the *word*. The root itself
ends in a consonant, and therefore the final vowel has little real
bearing on the meaning, aside from grammatical implications. So no,
this isn't a malgli fu'ivla at all, especially considering that in
English, the word doesn't even end in a vowel (in speech, of course),
so "pomegranate" is lojbanised to {pamygranet} (probably, I'm no
expert on lojbanisation; I prefer to use real lojban words over
lojbanisations any day).

What'd be unjustifiably malglico would be {grutrpamagranete} and that
certainly isn't the case with {grutrgranate} which is justified in all
aspects.

mu'o mi'e la tsani

On 8 July 2012 03:49, Lindar <lindarthebard@gmail.com> wrote:
> In all honesty my biggest complaint is the nagging idea that you p= refer
> {granate} to {granatu} and named it thus because of the English na= me for the
> item and not the linnean name as is customary. It's my own weird
> twitch-reaction, but I'm going to cry malglitarmi on this simply f= or the
> fact that it is anything more than vaguely similar. It has nothing= to do
> with a preferred final vowel and everything to do with the fact th= at you're
> making stuff look like English because you speak English.
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google= Groups
> "Lojban Beginners" group.
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msg/lojban-beg= inners/-/TX1byiv8jRMJ.
>
> To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/lojban-beginners?hl= =3Den.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= Lojban Beginners" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/l= ojban-beginners/-/D1gRf7b-jVMJ.
=20 To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@= googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= -beginners?hl=3Den.
------=_Part_198_10519161.1341739645119--