Received: from mail-gg0-f189.google.com ([209.85.161.189]:57872) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1SyaqI-0007aH-Jy; Mon, 06 Aug 2012 20:52:38 -0700 Received: by ggke5 with SMTP id e5sf4692520ggk.16 for ; Mon, 06 Aug 2012 20:52:20 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=Oi2pc413NpWrjrB1Uf8zs2RQkhgD7U/K9pUJvkM05Mk=; b=RTm1tSo3NPG37I6WOZ047YF8xtHs78Qod1BW5DVsQ28bpzm/nvAKpfa347RmA29mNy F1cIkRz66vSc6eQbsk2zqwbQz/IdJYVE/fpDXsduIWNnKvmxakjKfwzJp2OnKT/upTtG j1WnGNecC2YVtt7Mzab0TzZFo2MxGWBFzewjI= Received: by 10.50.197.202 with SMTP id iw10mr1256999igc.1.1344311539447; Mon, 06 Aug 2012 20:52:19 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.50.11.232 with SMTP id t8ls4338559igb.2.canary; Mon, 06 Aug 2012 20:52:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.43.101.129 with SMTP id da1mr5507655icc.29.1344311538747; Mon, 06 Aug 2012 20:52:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.43.101.129 with SMTP id da1mr5507653icc.29.1344311538722; Mon, 06 Aug 2012 20:52:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-ob0-f170.google.com (mail-ob0-f170.google.com [209.85.214.170]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id en7si2708681igc.0.2012.08.06.20.52.18 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 06 Aug 2012 20:52:18 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of lukeabergen@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.170 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.214.170; Received: by mail-ob0-f170.google.com with SMTP id wd18so7835752obb.29 for ; Mon, 06 Aug 2012 20:52:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.60.2.42 with SMTP id 10mr23095900oer.9.1344311538413; Mon, 06 Aug 2012 20:52:18 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.60.66.225 with HTTP; Mon, 6 Aug 2012 20:51:58 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <201208062302.06087.phma@phma.optus.nu> References: <201208062302.06087.phma@phma.optus.nu> From: Luke Bergen Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2012 23:51:58 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban-beginners] sedu'u and ko To: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: lukeabergen@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of lukeabergen@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.170 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=lukeabergen@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com; contact lojban-beginners+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 300742228892 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=e89a8fb205feb6eea304c6a4eb78 X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam_score: -0.7 X-Spam_score_int: -6 X-Spam_bar: / --e89a8fb205feb6eea304c6a4eb78 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 11:02 PM, Pierre Abbat wrote: > I think you mean "do cusku lo sedu'u mi prami do". The second "do" > refers to the same person as the first "do". It would be otherwise if you > had > said "do cusku lu mi prami do li'u". > > Pierre > -- > gau do li'i co'e kei do > > Is that true? If it were "lo du'u mi prami do" it would be true for sure. But isn't "sedu'u" the text which expresses the bridi x1? sedu'u has always kind of confused me. It's not a bridi, it's a "text expressing [bridi] which is x2", but not the kind of "text" that you get with lu li'u? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lojban Beginners" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban-beginners?hl=en. --e89a8fb205feb6eea304c6a4eb78 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 11:02 PM, Pierre Abbat <phma@phma.optus.nu>= wrote:
I think you mean "do cusku lo sedu'u mi prami do= ". The second "do"
refers to the same person as the first "do". It would be otherwis= e if you had
said "do cusku lu mi prami do li'u".

Pierre
--
gau do li'i co'e kei do


=A0Is that true? =A0If it were "lo du'u mi prami do" i= t would be true for sure. =A0But isn't "sedu'u" the text = which expresses the bridi x1?

sedu'u has always kind of confused me. =A0It's = not a bridi, it's a "text expressing [bridi] which is x2", bu= t not the kind of "text" that you get with lu li'u?

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= Lojban Beginners" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@= googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= -beginners?hl=3Den.
--e89a8fb205feb6eea304c6a4eb78--