Received: from mail-gg0-f189.google.com ([209.85.161.189]:45331)
	by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
	(Exim 4.76)
	(envelope-from <lojban-beginners+bncCNTPpI2KGxDGpoKBBRoEWfBiqw@googlegroups.com>)
	id 1Syazt-0007fX-Db; Mon, 06 Aug 2012 21:02:27 -0700
Received: by ggke5 with SMTP id e5sf4704679ggk.16
        for <multiple recipients>; Mon, 06 Aug 2012 21:02:14 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=googlegroups.com; s=beta;
        h=x-beenthere:received-spf:from:to:subject:date:user-agent:references
         :in-reply-to:mime-version:message-id:x-original-sender
         :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list
         :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender
         :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type:content-disposition;
        bh=jk9324LCulFualMnvBs4qJ4ySKz+1ZTZ6GlC27A+Lj4=;
        b=s5I/Rtj6EsxUJjDIsH2JyIJtqMeil8NYd8J3BWzPRsAwQH8qtdpHKaUYTJ6kJo+fUr
         pYx/WFpeAIUf6J/r9pjimVojdEvCdPfrhIAVU8fcVcHVwNJTjBPCvLASIiEBDLk65Q9j
         AC7zPQWAaEhonp9Kptj0MGRCYIrak0BXMY2fY=
Received: by 10.236.170.7 with SMTP id o7mr2264887yhl.3.1344312134519;
        Mon, 06 Aug 2012 21:02:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-BeenThere: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com
Received: by 10.236.186.72 with SMTP id v48ls68104yhm.7.gmail; Mon, 06 Aug
 2012 21:02:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.236.173.193 with SMTP id v41mr3008574yhl.0.1344312133907;
        Mon, 06 Aug 2012 21:02:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.236.173.193 with SMTP id v41mr3008572yhl.0.1344312133896;
        Mon, 06 Aug 2012 21:02:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from chausie (cpe-069-132-101-103.carolina.res.rr.com. [69.132.101.103])
        by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTP id q2si4858151yhi.5.2012.08.06.21.02.13;
        Mon, 06 Aug 2012 21:02:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 69.132.101.103 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of phma@phma.optus.nu) client-ip=69.132.101.103;
Received: from ip6-localhost (ip6-localhost [IPv6:::1])
	by chausie (Postfix) with ESMTP id C51B3217B1
	for <lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com>; Tue,  7 Aug 2012 00:02:12 -0400 (EDT)
From: Pierre Abbat <phma@phma.optus.nu>
To: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [lojban-beginners] sedu'u and ko
Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2012 00:02:09 -0400
User-Agent: KMail/1.9.6 (enterprise 0.20070907.709405)
References: <a28dd25c-ef78-429c-ab90-6a66be0900b2@googlegroups.com> <201208062302.06087.phma@phma.optus.nu> <CAEimHHB7-8+P1BirssPe8UG=eJK=frFj_GBw44NQF==xyhRR0w@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAEimHHB7-8+P1BirssPe8UG=eJK=frFj_GBw44NQF==xyhRR0w@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <201208070002.10472.phma@phma.optus.nu>
X-Original-Sender: phma@phma.optus.nu
X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com:
 69.132.101.103 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for
 domain of phma@phma.optus.nu) smtp.mail=phma@phma.optus.nu
Reply-To: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com
Precedence: list
Mailing-list: list lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com; contact lojban-beginners+owners@googlegroups.com
List-ID: <lojban-beginners.googlegroups.com>
X-Google-Group-Id: 300742228892
List-Post: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban-beginners/post?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com>
List-Help: <http://groups.google.com/support/?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban-beginners+help@googlegroups.com>
List-Archive: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban-beginners?hl=en_US>
Sender: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com
List-Subscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban-beginners/subscribe?hl=en_US>,
 <mailto:lojban-beginners+subscribe@googlegroups.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban-beginners/subscribe?hl=en_US>,
 <mailto:googlegroups-manage+300742228892+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/)
X-Spam_score: -0.7
X-Spam_score_int: -6
X-Spam_bar: /

On Monday 06 August 2012 23:51:58 Luke Bergen wrote:
>  Is that true?  If it were "lo du'u mi prami do" it would be true for sure.
>  But isn't "sedu'u" the text which expresses the bridi x1?
>
> sedu'u has always kind of confused me.  It's not a bridi, it's a "text
> expressing [bridi] which is x2", but not the kind of "text" that you get
> with lu li'u?

"do cusku lo sedu'u mi prami do" is equivalent to "do cusku lu do prami mi 
li'u" (except that in the first case it could have been said in Greek or 
Ithkuil or anything else).

Pierre

-- 
Jews use a lunisolar calendar; Muslims use a solely lunar calendar.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lojban Beginners" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban-beginners?hl=en.