Received: from mail-gg0-f189.google.com ([209.85.161.189]:48036) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1Sypcb-0000fV-3B; Tue, 07 Aug 2012 12:39:25 -0700 Received: by ggke5 with SMTP id e5sf5715971ggk.16 for ; Tue, 07 Aug 2012 12:39:10 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:x-pair-authenticated:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post :list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe :content-type; bh=yHgoVMTV1Z0ZwtkMpThHgK1giPZc5e8LR+i+b/cawts=; b=gDo3r5GouNpSkgwKDcdUSlIrLsml1AbSiCp4zZ/m3lxwYbBh7KFe7x+GJcWtU1kJo2 t6mdhimGICczmVTTWRaJEjFl2hgZU6afoPs4a5DH7cnnZAbh8IK2qeSvnTSFbJ3bhdzW 4cKMO9LcXAbCHPIE6HqoUcKty3i7KQe810frI= Received: by 10.50.195.231 with SMTP id ih7mr1174967igc.5.1344368349291; Tue, 07 Aug 2012 12:39:09 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.50.11.232 with SMTP id t8ls5335531igb.2.canary; Tue, 07 Aug 2012 12:39:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.43.54.203 with SMTP id vv11mr6702329icb.11.1344368348318; Tue, 07 Aug 2012 12:39:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.43.54.203 with SMTP id vv11mr6702328icb.11.1344368348300; Tue, 07 Aug 2012 12:39:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from relay01.pair.com (relay01.pair.com. [209.68.5.15]) by gmr-mx.google.com with SMTP id bg10si146179igc.3.2012.08.07.12.39.07; Tue, 07 Aug 2012 12:39:08 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 209.68.5.15 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of m3o@plasmatix.com) client-ip=209.68.5.15; Received: (qmail 60070 invoked from network); 7 Aug 2012 19:39:06 -0000 Received: from 87.160.143.17 (HELO ?192.168.1.33?) (87.160.143.17) by relay01.pair.com with SMTP; 7 Aug 2012 19:39:06 -0000 X-pair-Authenticated: 87.160.143.17 Message-ID: <50216ED9.5050608@plasmatix.com> Date: Tue, 07 Aug 2012 21:39:05 +0200 From: selpa'i User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:14.0) Gecko/20120713 Thunderbird/14.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [lojban-beginners] Re: sedu'u and ko References: <201208062302.06087.phma@phma.optus.nu> <201208070002.10472.phma@phma.optus.nu> <790b043f-085d-479d-98ab-5dbe51bf04b6@j28g2000yqh.googlegroups.com> <5f3c1611-8497-46d7-bc2c-34cfead5d0c5@j11g2000vbc.googlegroups.com> In-Reply-To: X-Original-Sender: m3o@plasmatix.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 209.68.5.15 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of m3o@plasmatix.com) smtp.mail=m3o@plasmatix.com Reply-To: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com; contact lojban-beginners+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 300742228892 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------040908020201030808040706" X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam_score: 0.0 X-Spam_score_int: 0 X-Spam_bar: / This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------040908020201030808040706 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Am 07.08.2012 20:47, schrieb Jonathan Jones: > On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 4:50 AM, ianek > wrote: > > You basically confirmed what I was saying, but you formally disagreed > with me. I don't understand. {se} acts on selbri, BAI, JA and some > other things, but not on NU. It acts on selbri built with NU, just > like in your examples. > > > {se} acts on /anything/ with an x2. {du'u} is a NU which has an x2. No. Despite the wording the CLL uses, a NU itself has no places at all. > On 7 Sie, 09:47, Jonathan Jones > wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 1:15 AM, ianek > wrote: > > > "cmavo clusters" in jbovlaste are somewhat messy, from what > I've seen. > > >http://camxes.lojban.org/camxes/?text=se+du%27u+broda > > > > The {se} still acts on {du'u}, not {du'u broda}. > No, it doesn't. SE want to act on selbri (among other things like connectives and TAGs), but NU are *not* selbri. If they were, you could say *{ko'a du'u} or *{lo du'u ku}, but you can't. > > > > Whatever comes after a NU, until the {kei} (elided or not), is > "eaten" by > > the NU. > > > > So {[zo'e] du'u broda [kei] [zo'e]} means "x1 is predication "broda" > > expressed in sentence x2". > > > > {se} merely switches the x1 and x2 of {du'u}. > > It's easier pe'i to see it as switching x1 and x2 of {du'u broda}, > because places are primarily property of selbri, not abstraction > markers. > > > Abstraction markers /are/ selbri. That's why they have places. Abstract*ions* are selbri. abstract*ors* (which you call "abstraction markers") are not. They do not have places. All that a NU does is *convert*. It converts a bridi into a selbri. Then you can apply SE on that selbri. The selbri which was created by the NU, *that* has a place structure, depending on the NU used. > > So, for example: > > > > du'u mi nelci lo blanu kei zoi gy. I like Blue. .gy > > > > and > > > > .i zoi gy. I like Blue. .gy se du'u mi nelci lo blanu > > > > are equivalent. > > Yes, and how it proves me wrong? I know all that, of course. {du'u mi > nelci lo blanu kei} is a selbri with two places and can be converted > with se. Why do we need to assume that SE act on NU if such assumption > is not needed to explain the grammar? > > > Because it's not an assumption. It's a fact. No, it's not. > > > You may want to read http://dag.github.com/cll/11/7/ > > I love how you still treat me as a complete co'a cilre. > > > No, I treat you like some who apparently needs to read the relevant > section of the official text on our language. No comment. mu'o mi'e la selpa'i -- .i pau mi me ma .i pa mai ko mi jungau la'e di'u .i ba bo mi va'o lo nu nelci lo nu me ma kau cu barkla .i va'o lo nu na nelci cu denpa ti lo nu mi drata -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lojban Beginners" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban-beginners?hl=en. --------------040908020201030808040706 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Am 07.08.2012 20:47, schrieb Jonathan Jones:
On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 4:50 AM, ianek <janek37@gmail.com> wrote:
You basically confirmed what I was saying, but you formally disagreed
with me. I don't understand. {se} acts on selbri, BAI, JA and some
other things, but not on NU. It acts on selbri built with NU, just
like in your examples.

{se} acts on /anything/ with an x2. {du'u} is a NU which has an x2.

No. Despite the wording the CLL uses, a NU itself has no places at all.

 
On 7 Sie, 09:47, Jonathan Jones <eyeo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 1:15 AM, ianek <jane...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > "cmavo clusters" in jbovlaste are somewhat messy, from what I've seen.
> >http://camxes.lojban.org/camxes/?text=se+du%27u+broda
>
> The {se} still acts on {du'u}, not {du'u broda}.

No, it doesn't. SE want to act on selbri (among other things like connectives and TAGs), but NU are *not* selbri. If they were, you could say *{ko'a du'u} or *{lo du'u ku}, but you can't.

>
> Whatever comes after a NU, until the {kei} (elided or not), is "eaten" by
> the NU.
>
> So {[zo'e] du'u broda [kei] [zo'e]} means "x1 is predication "broda"
> expressed in sentence x2".
>
> {se} merely switches the x1 and x2 of {du'u}.

It's easier pe'i to see it as switching x1 and x2 of {du'u broda},
because places are primarily property of selbri, not abstraction
markers.

Abstraction markers /are/ selbri. That's why they have places.

Abstractions are selbri. abstractors (which you call "abstraction markers") are not. They do not have places. All that a NU does is *convert*. It converts a bridi into a selbri. Then you can apply SE on that selbri. The selbri which was created by the NU, *that* has a place structure, depending on the NU used.

 
> So, for example:
>
> du'u mi nelci lo blanu kei zoi gy. I like Blue. .gy
>
> and
>
> .i zoi gy. I like Blue. .gy se du'u mi nelci lo blanu
>
> are equivalent.

Yes, and how it proves me wrong? I know all that, of course. {du'u mi
nelci lo blanu kei} is a selbri with two places and can be converted
with se. Why do we need to assume that SE act on NU if such assumption
is not needed to explain the grammar?

Because it's not an assumption. It's a fact.

No, it's not.

 
> You may want to read http://dag.github.com/cll/11/7/

I love how you still treat me as a complete co'a cilre.

No, I treat you like some who apparently needs to read the relevant section of the official text on our language.

No comment.

mu'o mi'e la selpa'i

-- 
.i pau mi me ma .i pa mai ko mi jungau la'e di'u 
.i ba bo mi va'o lo nu nelci lo nu me ma kau cu barkla 
.i va'o lo nu na nelci cu denpa ti lo nu mi drata

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lojban Beginners" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban-beginners?hl=en.
--------------040908020201030808040706--