Received: from mail-fa0-f61.google.com ([209.85.161.61]:39819) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1Sypoq-0000kK-If; Tue, 07 Aug 2012 12:52:08 -0700 Received: by fadw1 with SMTP id w1sf1880665fad.16 for ; Tue, 07 Aug 2012 12:51:48 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=iS0OYvZwklmxVyXraOf+a9gXWSUZDw67PID6nQKBNfQ=; b=ciQA9toL/Hk/mIzRL6sn1hrnncfacAl74y7PaFFcg7oZlPhA1TciDh8nm0xs57W67b sSwdZvZoAjr83pBuz6ylP7+PedV00qDzPphnYjOpgr5Rn/n63JTZFiyqiL3Knk1YERgh /0AaZueJGt12VGOYgPx/FtE3WeOjOoFbeCd7s= Received: by 10.204.133.195 with SMTP id g3mr606290bkt.15.1344369108269; Tue, 07 Aug 2012 12:51:48 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.204.143.140 with SMTP id v12ls825509bku.6.gmail; Tue, 07 Aug 2012 12:51:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.205.130.14 with SMTP id hk14mr2991566bkc.5.1344369107040; Tue, 07 Aug 2012 12:51:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.205.130.14 with SMTP id hk14mr2991565bkc.5.1344369107001; Tue, 07 Aug 2012 12:51:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-lb0-f179.google.com (mail-lb0-f179.google.com [209.85.217.179]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id j4si5902769bkj.3.2012.08.07.12.51.46 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 07 Aug 2012 12:51:46 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of eyeonus@gmail.com designates 209.85.217.179 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.217.179; Received: by lbao2 with SMTP id o2so57744lba.38 for ; Tue, 07 Aug 2012 12:51:46 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.152.127.98 with SMTP id nf2mr15909392lab.4.1344369106293; Tue, 07 Aug 2012 12:51:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.152.136.73 with HTTP; Tue, 7 Aug 2012 12:51:46 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <50216ED9.5050608@plasmatix.com> References: <201208062302.06087.phma@phma.optus.nu> <201208070002.10472.phma@phma.optus.nu> <790b043f-085d-479d-98ab-5dbe51bf04b6@j28g2000yqh.googlegroups.com> <5f3c1611-8497-46d7-bc2c-34cfead5d0c5@j11g2000vbc.googlegroups.com> <50216ED9.5050608@plasmatix.com> Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2012 13:51:46 -0600 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban-beginners] Re: sedu'u and ko From: Jonathan Jones To: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: eyeonus@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of eyeonus@gmail.com designates 209.85.217.179 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=eyeonus@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com; contact lojban-beginners+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 300742228892 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d042d05aa07157904c6b25340 X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam_score: -0.7 X-Spam_score_int: -6 X-Spam_bar: / --f46d042d05aa07157904c6b25340 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 1:39 PM, selpa'i wrote: > Am 07.08.2012 20:47, schrieb Jonathan Jones: > > On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 4:50 AM, ianek wrote: > >> You basically confirmed what I was saying, but you formally disagreed >> with me. I don't understand. {se} acts on selbri, BAI, JA and some >> other things, but not on NU. It acts on selbri built with NU, just >> like in your examples. >> > > {se} acts on /anything/ with an x2. {du'u} is a NU which has an x2. > > > No. Despite the wording the CLL uses, a NU itself has no places at all. > Really? Then why do they ALL have place tags in their definition? du'u abstractor: predication/bridi abstractor; x1 is predication [bridi] expressed in sentence x2.jei abstractor: truth-value abstractor; x1 is truth value of [bridi] under epistemology x2. ka abstractor: property/quality abstractor (-ness); x1 is quality/property exhibited by [bridi].li'iabstractor: experience abstractor; x1 is x2's experience of [bridi] (participant or observer).ni abstractor: quantity/amount abstractor; x1 is quantity/amount of [bridi] measured on scale x2.nu abstractor: generalized event abstractor; x1 is state/process/achievement/activity of [bridi].si'oabstractor: idea/concept abstractor; x1 is x2's concept of [bridi].su'uabstractor: generalized abstractor (how); x1 is [bridi] as a non-specific abstraction of type x2.mu'e abstractor: achievement (event) abstractor; x1 is the event-as-a-point/achievement of [bridi].pu'u abstractor: process (event) abstractor; x1 is process of [bridi] proceeding in stages x2 .za'i abstractor: state (event) abstractor; x1 is continuous state of [bridi] being true.zu'oabstractor: activity (event) abstractor; x1 is abstract activity of [bridi] composed of x2. > > > > >> On 7 Sie, 09:47, Jonathan Jones wrote: >> > On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 1:15 AM, ianek wrote: >> > > "cmavo clusters" in jbovlaste are somewhat messy, from what I've seen. >> > >http://camxes.lojban.org/camxes/?text=se+du%27u+broda >> > >> > The {se} still acts on {du'u}, not {du'u broda}. >> > > No, it doesn't. SE want to act on selbri (among other things like > connectives and TAGs), but NU are *not* selbri. If they were, you could say > *{ko'a du'u} or *{lo du'u ku}, but you can't. > > > >> > Whatever comes after a NU, until the {kei} (elided or not), is "eaten" >> by >> > the NU. >> > >> > So {[zo'e] du'u broda [kei] [zo'e]} means "x1 is predication "broda" >> > expressed in sentence x2". >> > >> > {se} merely switches the x1 and x2 of {du'u}. >> >> It's easier pe'i to see it as switching x1 and x2 of {du'u broda}, >> because places are primarily property of selbri, not abstraction >> markers. >> > > Abstraction markers /are/ selbri. That's why they have places. > > > Abstract*ions* are selbri. abstract*ors* (which you call "abstraction > markers") are not. They do not have places. All that a NU does is > *convert*. It converts a bridi into a selbri. Then you can apply SE on that > selbri. The selbri which was created by the NU, *that* has a place > structure, depending on the NU used. > > > >> > So, for example: >> > >> > du'u mi nelci lo blanu kei zoi gy. I like Blue. .gy >> > >> > and >> > >> > .i zoi gy. I like Blue. .gy se du'u mi nelci lo blanu >> > >> > are equivalent. >> >> Yes, and how it proves me wrong? I know all that, of course. {du'u mi >> nelci lo blanu kei} is a selbri with two places and can be converted >> with se. Why do we need to assume that SE act on NU if such assumption >> is not needed to explain the grammar? >> > > Because it's not an assumption. It's a fact. > > > No, it's not. > > > > >> > You may want to read http://dag.github.com/cll/11/7/ >> >> I love how you still treat me as a complete co'a cilre. >> > > No, I treat you like some who apparently needs to read the relevant > section of the official text on our language. > > > No comment. > > mu'o mi'e la selpa'i > > -- > .i pau mi me ma .i pa mai ko mi jungau la'e di'u > .i ba bo mi va'o lo nu nelci lo nu me ma kau cu barkla > .i va'o lo nu na nelci cu denpa ti lo nu mi drata > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Lojban Beginners" group. > To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/lojban-beginners?hl=en. > -- mu'o mi'e .aionys. .i.e'ucai ko cmima lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi.luk. mi patfu do zo'o (Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. :D ) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lojban Beginners" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban-beginners?hl=en. --f46d042d05aa07157904c6b25340 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 1:39 PM, selpa= 9;i <m3o@plasmatix.com> wrote:
=20 =20 =20
Am 07.08.2012 20:47, schrieb Jonathan Jones:
On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 4:50 AM, ianek <ja= nek37@gmail.com> wrote:
You basically confirmed what I was saying, but you formally disagreed
with me. I don't understand. {se} acts on selbri, BAI, JA and some
other things, but not on NU. It acts on selbri built with NU, just
like in your examples.

{se} acts on /anything/ with an x2. {du'u} is a NU which has an x2.

No. Despite the wording the CLL uses, a NU itself has no plac= es at all.

Really? Then why do they ALL = have place tags in their definition?

du'u
abstractor: predicatio= n/bridi abstractor; x1 is predication [bridi] expressed in sente= nce x2.
jei
abs= tractor: truth-value abstractor; x1 is truth value of [bridi] un= der epistemology x2.
ka
abstractor: property/quality abstractor (-ness); x1 is quali= ty/property exhibited by [bridi].
li'i
abstractor: experience abstracto= r; x1 is x2's experience of [bridi] (participant = or observer).
ni
abstr= actor: quantity/amount abstractor; x1 is quantity/amount of [bri= di] measured on scale x2.
nu
abstractor: generalized event abstractor; x1 is state/proces= s/achievement/activity of [bridi].
si'o
abstractor: idea/concept abstra= ctor; x1 is x2's concept of [bridi].
su'u
abstractor: generalized abstractor (how); x1 is [bridi] as = a non-specific abstraction of type x2.
mu'e
abstractor: achievement (event) abstractor; x1 is the event-= as-a-point/achievement of [bridi].
pu'u
abstractor: process (event) abs= tractor; x1 is process of [bridi] proceeding in stages x2.
za'i
abstractor: state (event) abstractor; x1 is continuous stat= e of [bridi] being true.
zu'o
abstractor: activity (event) abstractor; x1 is abstract acti= vity of [bridi] composed of x2.
=A0


=A0
On 7 Sie, 09:47, Jonathan Jones <eyeo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 1:15 AM, ianek <jane= ...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > "cmavo clusters" in jbovlaste are somewhat = messy, from what I've seen.
> >http://camxes.lojban.org/camxes/?text=3Dse+= du%27u+broda
>
> The {se} still acts on {du'u}, not {du'u broda}.

No, it doesn't. SE want to act on selbri (among other thi= ngs like connectives and TAGs), but NU are *not* selbri. If they were, you could say *{ko'a du'u} or *{lo du'u ku}, but you can&= #39;t.

>
> Whatever comes after a NU, until the {kei} (elided or not), is "eaten" by
> the NU.
>
> So {[zo'e] du'u broda [kei] [zo'e]} means &quo= t;x1 is predication "broda"
> expressed in sentence x2".
>
> {se} merely switches the x1 and x2 of {du'u}.

It's easier pe'i to see it as switching x1 and x2 of {du&= #39;u broda},
because places are primarily property of selbri, not abstraction
markers.

Abstraction markers /are/ selbri. That's why they have places= .

Abstractions are selbri. abstractors (which you call "abstraction markers") are not. They do not have place= s. All that a NU does is *convert*. It converts a bridi into a selbri. Then you can apply SE on that selbri. The selbri which was created by the NU, *that* has a place structure, depending on the NU used.

=A0
> So, for example:
>
> du'u mi nelci lo blanu kei zoi gy. I like Blue. .gy >
> and
>
> .i zoi gy. I like Blue. .gy se du'u mi nelci lo blanu<= br> >
> are equivalent.

Yes, and how it proves me wrong? I know all that, of course. {du'u mi
nelci lo blanu kei} is a selbri with two places and can be converted
with se. Why do we need to assume that SE act on NU if such assumption
is not needed to explain the grammar?

Because it's not an assumption. It's a fact.

No, it's not.


=A0
> You may want to read http://dag.github.com/cll/11/7/

I love how you still treat me as a complete co'a cilre.

No, I treat you like some who apparently needs to read the relevant section of the official text on our language.

No comment.

mu'o mi'e la selpa'i

--=20
.i pau mi me ma .i pa mai ko mi jungau la'e di'u=20
.i ba bo mi va'o lo nu nelci lo nu me ma kau cu barkla=20
.i va'o lo nu na nelci cu denpa ti lo nu mi drata

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;Lojban Beginners" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban-beginners+un= subscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/g= roup/lojban-beginners?hl=3Den.



--
mu'o mi= 'e .aionys.

.i.e'ucai ko cmima lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi.l= uk. mi patfu do zo'o
(Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. = :D )

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= Lojban Beginners" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@= googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= -beginners?hl=3Den.
--f46d042d05aa07157904c6b25340--