Received: from mail-pb0-f61.google.com ([209.85.160.61]:54082) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1T8Bo9-0002s6-FY; Sun, 02 Sep 2012 08:09:59 -0700 Received: by pbbrp2 with SMTP id rp2sf4326097pbb.16 for ; Sun, 02 Sep 2012 08:09:47 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=TL2jOA2n8B2eQhhuHk05qTcMuCsehQDt9E5fITHSjUA=; b=kej6kw7ZTl/v2cPmZAUOzMmzW4PJBatNaAJumUbKEN3bq4QWDLiEeAeua/lB5rWFhS K3Bp0mcdmOhrX3USJSXCDm5n5zxw3WPL//Btu7eYIgsWhcFT0V5ns2dHwuT53iugq6dK /HlmgbQI29i6vg2N6p4GraIlaxyr5bEH9JEKFMeur7N2I91e7oZVykWD1qsZzS2dcGuM b/fE1z6gV9Uu/FqKBw3yNtsTwEckC24K1Mk83OaY1D9Fc/SFUaf+ue4tLK2f3IOhlH2N pUhIbwjK66p6im0v61dK45KAg4XUkXNHPeAJurW0IM6s9thSKKntCauu9Ld+R5AtUtyx 9iBA== Received: by 10.52.35.84 with SMTP id f20mr1955853vdj.3.1346598586871; Sun, 02 Sep 2012 08:09:46 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.220.148.143 with SMTP id p15ls3971431vcv.9.gmail; Sun, 02 Sep 2012 08:09:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.58.117.41 with SMTP id kb9mr3787203veb.27.1346598586442; Sun, 02 Sep 2012 08:09:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.58.117.41 with SMTP id kb9mr3787202veb.27.1346598586427; Sun, 02 Sep 2012 08:09:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-vb0-f50.google.com (mail-vb0-f50.google.com [209.85.212.50]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id l5si410200vdg.1.2012.09.02.08.09.46 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sun, 02 Sep 2012 08:09:46 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of nictytan@gmail.com designates 209.85.212.50 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.212.50; Received: by vbal1 with SMTP id l1so5789096vba.23 for ; Sun, 02 Sep 2012 08:09:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.221.10.148 with SMTP id pa20mr9928350vcb.26.1346598586254; Sun, 02 Sep 2012 08:09:46 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.52.178.106 with HTTP; Sun, 2 Sep 2012 08:09:26 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <369b1b83-0407-4ccf-aa59-89a5ffbaf473@googlegroups.com> From: Jacob Errington Date: Sun, 2 Sep 2012 11:09:26 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban-beginners] Where should I use sets and where should I use masses? To: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: nictytan@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of nictytan@gmail.com designates 209.85.212.50 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=nictytan@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com; contact lojban-beginners+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 300742228892 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=bcaec54d4e0a6383f304c8b96a2f X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam_score: -0.7 X-Spam_score_int: -6 X-Spam_bar: / --bcaec54d4e0a6383f304c8b96a2f Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 2 September 2012 11:03, Jorge Llamb=EDas wrote: > On Sun, Sep 2, 2012 at 11:47 AM, Jacob Errington > wrote: > > > > Sets are required in some places in lojban, such as simxu1 and cmima2 > (these > > relationships don't actually involve the underlying properties of the > > elements of the set) > > > > e.g. lo'i ro jbopre cu simxu lo ka ce'u slabu ce'u -> All lojbanists kn= ow > > each other. > > e.g. ko cmima lo'i jbopre -> Join the lojbanists! > > The disadvantage of defining "simxu" and "cmima" that way, is that you > can't easily say things like: > > lo ro jbopre cu zvati ti gi'e simxu lo ka ce'u slabu ce'u > All lojbanists are here and know each other. > > I don't see any advantage to defining "simxu" and the few other gismu > that are defined that way in terms of sets, so I use them as if they > were defined in a more user-friendly manner, in terms of ordinary > groups rather than mathematical sets. > Of course, if we work under the assumption that {lo} produces the weird polymorphic type, then yes, you can get away with shenanigans like that, but if you don't, you need an experimental in the form of a sort of JAI that can do afterthought LAhE in the way JAI TAG does afterthought TAG. .i mi'e la tsani mu'o > > mu'o mi'e xorxes > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Lojban Beginners" group. > To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/lojban-beginners?hl=3Den. > > --=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= Lojban Beginners" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@= googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= -beginners?hl=3Den. --bcaec54d4e0a6383f304c8b96a2f Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 2 September 2012 11:03, Jorge Llamb=EDas <jjllambias@gmail.com= > wrote:
On Sun, Sep 2, 2012 at 11:47 AM, Jacob Errington <nictytan@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Sets are required in some places in lojban, such as simxu1 and cmima2 = (these
> relationships don't actually involve the underlying properties of = the
> elements of the set)
>
> e.g. lo'i ro jbopre cu simxu lo ka ce'u slabu ce'u -> A= ll lojbanists know
> each other.
> e.g. ko cmima lo'i jbopre -> Join the lojbanists!

The disadvantage of defining "simxu" and "cmima" = that way, is that you
can't easily say things like:

lo ro jbopre cu zvati ti gi'e simxu lo ka ce'u slabu ce'u
All lojbanists are here and know each other.

I don't see any advantage to defining "simxu" and the few oth= er gismu
that are defined that way in terms of sets, so I use them as if they
were defined in a more user-friendly manner, in terms of ordinary
groups rather than mathematical sets.

O= f course, if we work under the assumption that {lo} produces the weird poly= morphic type, then yes, you can get away with shenanigans like that, but if= you don't, you need an experimental in the form of a sort of JAI that = can do afterthought LAhE in the way JAI TAG does afterthought TAG.

.i mi'e la tsani mu'o
=A0

mu'o mi'e xorxes

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;Lojban Beginners" group.
To post to this group, send e= mail to lojban-beginne= rs@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@googlegr= oups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/g= roup/lojban-beginners?hl=3Den.


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= Lojban Beginners" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@= googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= -beginners?hl=3Den.
--bcaec54d4e0a6383f304c8b96a2f--