Received: from mail-ie0-f189.google.com ([209.85.223.189]:61987) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1T9kVP-0005vL-8s; Thu, 06 Sep 2012 15:25:03 -0700 Received: by ieak10 with SMTP id k10sf1233527iea.16 for ; Thu, 06 Sep 2012 15:24:53 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=x-beenthere:mime-version:date:in-reply-to:references:user-agent :x-http-useragent:message-id:subject:from:to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=PT04sayi6LY+m69lNte5DgNqVKTGfQ3qrRU6O4tJ4dQ=; b=GRuyfCU2zPpxOLjUbWVPiGKIx680wMc1CMtHi74kuW3PCYtRUMnqWDbW4nFl4bIzrC n8wUHNrj7fsS+Tu8L//TmndIYDXopZhR2NPND+LBF3ZgJJKvz1j7+qQeIby8af95SWnk 1DkDboEq9ZOyBi38eGoq/qlb81GRgLtlH9DsoM3XIQaJsNnaAfYdtE8E6gCvOG8i8hYx T7rNeaZmSYCWbvsrx/mZbKAOGHa5vbHP6zkur65DCGGJx3y5f0n/Fos6yIC/C2E/jDT0 9PzQGoKInQbH3HD6un7Upzu8m0gpA+xKugzZMZoSWC+Xq8gCUaJu3yqy4PlKXv4dlPga vWBQ== Received: by 10.52.94.135 with SMTP id dc7mr749872vdb.4.1346970292468; Thu, 06 Sep 2012 15:24:52 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.220.141.4 with SMTP id k4ls53836vcu.8.gmail; Thu, 06 Sep 2012 15:24:52 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.52.90.129 with SMTP id bw1mr760077vdb.13.1346970292101; Thu, 06 Sep 2012 15:24:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: by p5g2000vbl.googlegroups.com with HTTP; Thu, 6 Sep 2012 15:24:52 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2012 15:24:52 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <369b1b83-0407-4ccf-aa59-89a5ffbaf473@googlegroups.com> <02c05dfc-7cc4-4ec6-a331-d915e2e9cdbf@s5g2000vbj.googlegroups.com> <07b7573a-45c9-44be-9d03-a74aa2b1127d@q20g2000vbx.googlegroups.com> User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686) AppleWebKit/537.1 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/21.0.1180.89 Safari/537.1,gzip(gfe) Message-ID: <6bbe2f0e-9e7e-47e5-bbe1-0896c881dae9@p5g2000vbl.googlegroups.com> Subject: [lojban-beginners] Re: Where should I use sets and where should I use masses? From: ianek To: Lojban Beginners X-Original-Sender: janek37@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: ls.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of janek37@gmail.com designates internal as permitted sender) smtp.mail=janek37@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com; contact lojban-beginners+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 300742228892 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam_score: -0.7 X-Spam_score_int: -6 X-Spam_bar: / On 7 Wrz, 00:18, Jorge Llamb=EDas wrote: > On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 4:39 PM, ianek wrote: > > On 5 Wrz, 00:24, Jorge Llamb=EDas wrote: > >> On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 4:52 AM, ianek wrote: > > >> > It's a property of being a cliquehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clique= _(graph_theory). > > >> If you restrict "simxu" to the cliques of graph theory, you can't use > >> it for something like: > > >> lo zajba pu simxu lo ka ce'u ce'u sanli kei gi'e se morna lo remna pra= mide > >> "The gymnasts stood on one another's shoulders and formed a human pyra= mid." > > > So what {simxu} really means? That the graph is connected? > > Maybe even that is not completely necessary. Probably something like > most/almost all nodes must be connected to other nodes and the > connections have to be dense enough. > > >Arguments > > based on something that sounds good in a natural language are > > suspicious for me. The definitions of Lojban words are (in most cases) > > in a natural language, but it doesn't mean that they should be > > ambiguous. > > Vague is not the same as ambiguous. You can always define a more > precise word ("rolrelsi'u"? "simymu'o"? something else?) for the more > specific meaning. If you make "simxu" require full pairwise > distributivity, you make it practically unusable for most ordinary > contexts. This is exactly the problem with Lojban. It aims at being logical, but the more logical, the more unusable it is, and vice versa. Some time ago I thought it was possible to translate from Lojban to formal logic... > > mu'o mi'e xorxes --=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= Lojban Beginners" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@= googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= -beginners?hl=3Den.