Received: from mail-we0-f189.google.com ([74.125.82.189]:51103) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1T9lxK-0006cM-UG; Thu, 06 Sep 2012 16:58:00 -0700 Received: by weyu3 with SMTP id u3sf836538wey.16 for ; Thu, 06 Sep 2012 16:57:47 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=OUiqYO4vhnuES5/cPviCkGSfO4B6EZ1mmXG67zt39YE=; b=LGertPMcUS+e1AJMymUgXq6SpDFtnttrfKZ8nX214zjKyr1DElHvUljkkPJq4QEahU n28K0wMpsK/3XsLq0BduAFtd3GVixhtVlPA73u9c4mH5ilRHwSicVgQNsKw39B2oETOu plfwMlo8V4MzQdoTepgZSTkwiY4ZiZ1VIsGgmEfZw+PjM77mHcOfGrioMCxVv3WQJQpj vtpdh+WDwZIwSfrqQMqMSwXJWicIwOajJVaZvRCaU1hnpliTGziU0puCjq66s3fDqmdU P5BN8j8XzDpP53dRTp/7J2SSuuntemOFYeJder2cPTYIdnY32vZ3q4iNuR5mhSRYcg8G jDVw== Received: by 10.216.134.148 with SMTP id s20mr171006wei.45.1346975865202; Thu, 06 Sep 2012 16:57:45 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.14.211.69 with SMTP id v45ls6487eeo.8.gmail; Thu, 06 Sep 2012 16:57:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.14.205.5 with SMTP id i5mr3741115eeo.5.1346975864344; Thu, 06 Sep 2012 16:57:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.14.205.5 with SMTP id i5mr3741114eeo.5.1346975864332; Thu, 06 Sep 2012 16:57:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-ee0-f47.google.com (mail-ee0-f47.google.com [74.125.83.47]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id d5si4535634eep.0.2012.09.06.16.57.44 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 06 Sep 2012 16:57:44 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of jjllambias@gmail.com designates 74.125.83.47 as permitted sender) client-ip=74.125.83.47; Received: by eekb57 with SMTP id b57so880933eek.6 for ; Thu, 06 Sep 2012 16:57:44 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.14.177.193 with SMTP id d41mr5369230eem.19.1346975864155; Thu, 06 Sep 2012 16:57:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.14.95.78 with HTTP; Thu, 6 Sep 2012 16:57:44 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <369b1b83-0407-4ccf-aa59-89a5ffbaf473@googlegroups.com> <02c05dfc-7cc4-4ec6-a331-d915e2e9cdbf@s5g2000vbj.googlegroups.com> <07b7573a-45c9-44be-9d03-a74aa2b1127d@q20g2000vbx.googlegroups.com> <6bbe2f0e-9e7e-47e5-bbe1-0896c881dae9@p5g2000vbl.googlegroups.com> Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2012 20:57:44 -0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban-beginners] Re: Where should I use sets and where should I use masses? From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jorge_Llamb=EDas?= To: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: jjllambias@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of jjllambias@gmail.com designates 74.125.83.47 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=jjllambias@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com; contact lojban-beginners+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 300742228892 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam_score: -0.7 X-Spam_score_int: -6 X-Spam_bar: / On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 8:02 PM, Jacob Errington wrote: > > latro'a and I have a strict(er) view of Lojban in that regard and believe > than simxu1 must be a set, and that the simxu action is fully pairwise. But in what sense does that definition make Lojban more strict? Are you saying that a predicate with the more vague meaning is simply not a possible predicate in your strict version of Lojban? > {mi > ce do simxu lo ka cinba} therefore has the obvious meaning. Likewise, {lo'i > nanmu ce lo'i ninmu cu simxu lo ka cinba} (I'm using ce as a cheap set > addition because I can't be bothered to really look up how to do it) Set union is "jo'e" (but maybe that's not what you want either). "ce" would create a set whose two members are each a set. >doesn't > mean that all the men kissed all the women and vice-versa; it means that > each of the men kissed each of the women and also *was kissed* by each of > them. That would be my intended interpretation of that, for instance. And also each men kissed and was kissed by each of the other men, right? Otherwise you don't want the union there but something more complicated. If you don't include the same sex kissing pairs, that wouldn't match ianek's interpretation. mu'o mi'e xorxes -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lojban Beginners" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban-beginners?hl=en.