Received: from mail-pz0-f61.google.com ([209.85.210.61]:41150) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1TAQ1x-00038S-7y; Sat, 08 Sep 2012 11:45:26 -0700 Received: by daek18 with SMTP id k18sf782986dae.16 for ; Sat, 08 Sep 2012 11:45:15 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references :from:date:message-id:subject:to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=FXUu1T4umkXGyHS1xe6splbpylsKZrHhphndJf3Cc+I=; b=lJe4c3InRFP0or70oeG7qZq8zEbGU1UphQTbmJbXVucwlL1kHk/Q1W3HPoknjyc60F 16zDOg9hDcKk9OBcZntPCuZnJVCqBShjIMTu3ogY9XtyIjZEzOz/Gmm5rUkI8x3M8a/c MV4yT5gv27ha4bRIqI4Ai8N5X4/xumAuY52Hv7c7pxeS36zgxnMlzz0FPTiRxKjZPvZO KGAyDw+xuJKaq+dzaVqgJxf+UNfNKi5BLF2I7IORZPoUuAJkheWADht5VRqSYSQ+VAyS HAT50A5DuO/raswx7zvwGtXTNN1xJKQSokWlzsP46x+jEiuPpRJXkIs0QrnqPAKnwta8 m4Sw== Received: by 10.50.40.165 with SMTP id y5mr1054778igk.1.1347129914720; Sat, 08 Sep 2012 11:45:14 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.231.2.13 with SMTP id 13ls1123358ibh.1.gmail; Sat, 08 Sep 2012 11:45:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.43.131.4 with SMTP id ho4mr118343icc.23.1347129913943; Sat, 08 Sep 2012 11:45:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.43.131.4 with SMTP id ho4mr118342icc.23.1347129913921; Sat, 08 Sep 2012 11:45:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-ob0-f171.google.com (mail-ob0-f171.google.com [209.85.214.171]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id ba5si1111636igb.3.2012.09.08.11.45.13 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sat, 08 Sep 2012 11:45:13 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of rpglover64@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.171 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.214.171; Received: by mail-ob0-f171.google.com with SMTP id v19so2532217obq.16 for ; Sat, 08 Sep 2012 11:45:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.60.7.99 with SMTP id i3mr9162313oea.86.1347129913767; Sat, 08 Sep 2012 11:45:13 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.76.132.2 with HTTP; Sat, 8 Sep 2012 11:44:53 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <990957eb-a351-49c8-98d2-cfe4643f74db@googlegroups.com> References: <20be4ca8-903c-4c64-bf94-554dd2a6bd92@googlegroups.com> <990957eb-a351-49c8-98d2-cfe4643f74db@googlegroups.com> From: ".arpis." Date: Sat, 8 Sep 2012 14:44:53 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban-beginners] Re: Animal noises To: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: rpglover64@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of rpglover64@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.171 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=rpglover64@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com; contact lojban-beginners+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 300742228892 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=e89a8fb2052cf9f8ae04c9351f67 X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam_score: -0.7 X-Spam_score_int: -6 X-Spam_bar: / --e89a8fb2052cf9f8ae04c9351f67 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 I think you need {lo'u} and {le'u} instead of {lu} and {li'u}, considering the contents are not "grammatical lojban text". You may also choose to simplify this by omitting the quotes, since {arfarf} is as valid a cmevla as {arf} is. On Sat, Sep 8, 2012 at 1:38 PM, Adam Milligan wrote: > *So could I get away with something like...* > * > > The little duck is lost. Woof! Woof! > .i .uinai lo cmalu datka ku farcri* > .i sa'ei lu arf arf lu'i (for lack of a 'w' sound...my wife suggests vuf > or even uif) > do I need the the lu...li'u? > > And then would... > .i sa'ie lu kuak kuak li'u > work for 'Quack! Quack!'? > > I have one "Splash!" as well > .i sa'ie splac > > is my guess. Thanks for the feedback! > > Adam > > On Saturday, September 8, 2012 10:56:23 AM UTC-6, Lindar wrote: >> >> This is adorable and your grammar is spot on. I think sa'ei is almost >> what you want, but not quite. I think you could get away with >> barking/quacking a UI. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Lojban Beginners" group. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msg/lojban-beginners/-/nCToQIFYiN0J. > > To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/lojban-beginners?hl=en. > -- mu'o mi'e .arpis. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lojban Beginners" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban-beginners?hl=en. --e89a8fb2052cf9f8ae04c9351f67 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I think you need {lo'u} and {le'u} instead of {lu} and {li'u}, = considering the contents are not "grammatical lojban text".
You may also choose to simplify this by omitting the quotes, since {arfar= f} is as valid a cmevla as {arf} is.

On Sat, Sep 8, 2012 at 1:38 PM, Adam Milliga= n <amilligan74@gmail.com> wrote:
So could I get away with something= like...

The little duck is lost. =A0Woof! =A0Woof!

.i .uinai lo cmalu datka ku farcri
.i sa'ei lu arf arf lu'i (for lack of a 'w= ' sound...my wife suggests vuf or even uif)
do I need the the lu...li'u?

And then = would...
.i sa'ie lu kuak kuak li'u
=
work for 'Quack! Quack!'?

I have on= e "Splash!" as well
.i sa'ie splac

is my guess. = =A0Thanks for the feedback!

Adam
=
On Saturday, September 8, 2012 10:56:23 AM UTC-6, Lindar wrote:This is adorable and your grammar is spot = on. I think sa'ei is almost what you want, but not quite. I think you c= ould get away with barking/quacking a UI.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;Lojban Beginners" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.= google.com/d/msg/lojban-beginners/-/nCToQIFYiN0J.
=

=20 To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban-beginners+un= subscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/g= roup/lojban-beginners?hl=3Den.



--
mu'o mi= 'e .arpis.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= Lojban Beginners" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@= googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= -beginners?hl=3Den.
--e89a8fb2052cf9f8ae04c9351f67--