Received: from mail-ie0-f189.google.com ([209.85.223.189]:54912) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1TNPM5-0004dU-Pr; Sun, 14 Oct 2012 07:39:56 -0700 Received: by mail-ie0-f189.google.com with SMTP id c10sf3778657ieb.16 for ; Sun, 14 Oct 2012 07:39:43 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=8wBzEQSwJjysXbStG95D4QfO/tLz5QWd/6hlxM++GcY=; b=umG1m7J50NE7S9okyip+wazWqi8g9msF487pmOpnPCzqzl/pbBBKVSyiMzwEOnPIRM xTPECQWLwUJjQX24OXSfCURVdW8ZBKMp0mfhUCQgGFDN3HwYUisIGe9ozrgjq6bS63Yq QVtm5eK/r0Qbv/xjl6iU3hf0brn4fsmDOT6YS6CHG2u4Y4BwB58R4hZ9X6jyae+0M63L AMKRQ+gMvMyceu/ddP3SB7FMbWTne4SOBDkPAJzswqHX+joZVEinstjthn2IQavRG9bG qwe3qXUbMJgewkBmf1XaaapE24Hw1iXsWdUPtKxhOC0Mo6pRPHiHReoGOjmGWR0+bJle Gf3w== Received: by 10.52.156.115 with SMTP id wd19mr1415474vdb.2.1350225583073; Sun, 14 Oct 2012 07:39:43 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.220.107.208 with SMTP id c16ls3007638vcp.3.gmail; Sun, 14 Oct 2012 07:39:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.58.127.226 with SMTP id nj2mr1983848veb.3.1350225582660; Sun, 14 Oct 2012 07:39:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.58.127.226 with SMTP id nj2mr1983847veb.3.1350225582644; Sun, 14 Oct 2012 07:39:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-vc0-f172.google.com (mail-vc0-f172.google.com [209.85.220.172]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id dj17si169569vdb.1.2012.10.14.07.39.42 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sun, 14 Oct 2012 07:39:42 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of nictytan@gmail.com designates 209.85.220.172 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.220.172; Received: by mail-vc0-f172.google.com with SMTP id fl11so6093921vcb.3 for ; Sun, 14 Oct 2012 07:39:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.58.95.65 with SMTP id di1mr5441870veb.55.1350225582480; Sun, 14 Oct 2012 07:39:42 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.52.89.84 with HTTP; Sun, 14 Oct 2012 07:39:22 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <3dce2eae-f93d-4ce4-8965-3d6b61a7f7bf@googlegroups.com> <9dcdebaf-2e65-44c4-9652-7e9b7f094589@googlegroups.com> From: Jacob Errington Date: Sun, 14 Oct 2012 10:39:22 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban-beginners] I think I can use "kau" to express Japanese "ga" and "wa" To: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: nictytan@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of nictytan@gmail.com designates 209.85.220.172 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=nictytan@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com; contact lojban-beginners+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 300742228892 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=e89a8f503b7235dd2704cc05e41b X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam_score: -0.7 X-Spam_score_int: -6 X-Spam_bar: / --e89a8f503b7235dd2704cc05e41b Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On 14 October 2012 07:31, gleki wrote: > > > On Saturday, October 13, 2012 5:47:42 PM UTC+4, tsani wrote: > >> On 13 October 2012 01:04, gleki wrote: >> >>> >>> In the parallel thread I completely forgot to explain why I thought >>> {kau} could be used for focus of any sentence. >>> >>> Look at the following example: >>> [.i paunai ma zekri prenu .i mi djuno lo du'u makau zekri prenu .i mi >>> djuno lo du'u la .djan. kau zekri prenu] .i la .djan. kau zekri prenu >>> >>> >> Yeah, I don't know why you'd think the kau gets preserved. {makau} acts >> as one single unit, and gets replaced entirely when you want to insert the >> "answer" to the indirect question. >> > > This would make sense if {la djan. kau} were absent in the CLL. > {kau} is glossed as "indirect question" and I can't see any questions in > {la djan. kau}. > > The CLL being wrong is new? :P > >> >>> >>> Now imagine that we omit the sentences in brackets and let the context >>> decide what's going on here. >>> Even then it's pretty simple to reconstruct first three sentences if >>> only the last one is given. >>> But it just means that every time you use {kau} without any questions >>> (even indirect questions), even then it doesn't mean that those questions >>> are absent. >>> >>> They still EXIST. They are just omitted by the speaker but can be easily >>> resurrected from the sentences that are actually said. >>> Really it would be very verbous to say >>> *.i paunai ma zekri prenu .i mi djuno lo du'u makau zekri prenu .i mi >>> djuno lo du'u la .djan. kau zekri prenu.....................* >>> >>> It's just not worth it. >>> >>> >> Or we could just say {la djan zekri prenu}. In a real conversation, the >> difference between the two sentences, with and without kau, is purely >> textual, AFAICT. Using {kau} conveys no extra meaning, and therefore leads >> me to believe that it's pointless to use. >> >> >>> >>> However, I doubt a bit that it is {kau}, not any other UI-cmavo that can >>> serve this purpose. >>> Do we have a generalised UI-cmavo like we have {su'u} as a generalised >>> NU-cmavo? >>> {ge'e} speaks about emotions so it won't work. >>> >>> >> Guys, it's ba'e. Can we please stop trying to use kau for things other >> than indirect questions? :) >> > > I'm not sure if emphasis and topic-comment structure are always identical. > > No, of course they aren't the same, and I didn't say they were. {zo'u} is for topic-comment structure, and {ba'e} is for emphasis. The CLL is right on that one. > If you want to say "It's John, and not someone else, that is the >> criminal" then why are you all pining for {la djan kau co'e} rather than >> {ba'e la djan co'e} ? >> >> >>> Next, {paunai} is defined as a rhetorical question. I don't know exactly >>> what "rhetorical" means. For me this glossword includes some emotions. But >>> if {paunai} is just the opposite of {pau} and {pau} is just a question >>> marker then for me {paunai=kau}. >>> >>> >> A rhetorical question is a sentence that appears to be a question, but >> isn't actually asking anything. "Who could *do* such a thing!?" could be a >> rhetorical question. {kau} is not for "questions that aren't questions"; >> {kau} is for *indirect questions*. Those are both *different* things, and >> therefore have *different* cmavo, albeit both UI. >> >> .i mi'e la tsani mu'o >> > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Lojban Beginners" group. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msg/lojban-beginners/-/76RjAIGKOLIJ. > > To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/lojban-beginners?hl=en. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lojban Beginners" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban-beginners?hl=en. --e89a8f503b7235dd2704cc05e41b Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 14 October 2012 07:31, gleki <gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com&g= t; wrote:


On Saturday, October 13, 2012 5:47:42 PM UTC+4, tsani wrote:
On 13 October 2012 01:04= , gleki <gleki.is...@gmail.com> wrote= :

In the parallel thread I completely forgot to explain why I thought {ka= u} could be used for focus of any sentence.

Look at the = following example:
[.i paunai ma zekri prenu .i mi djuno lo du= 9;u makau zekri prenu=A0.i mi djuno lo du'u la .djan. kau zekri prenu]= =A0.i la .djan. kau zekri prenu


Yeah, I don't know why = you'd think the kau gets preserved. {makau} acts as one single unit, an= d gets replaced entirely when you want to insert the "answer" to = the indirect question.

This would make sense if {la d= jan. kau} =A0were absent in the CLL.
{kau} is glossed as "in= direct question" and I can't see any questions in {la djan. kau}.<= /div>


The= CLL being wrong is new? :P
=A0
=A0

Now imagine that we omit the sentences in br= ackets and let the context decide what's going on here.
Even then it's pretty simple to reconstruct first three sentences = if only the last one is given.
But it just means that every time = you use {kau} without any questions (even indirect questions), even then it= doesn't mean that those questions are absent.

They still EXIST. They are just omitted by the speaker = but can be easily resurrected from the sentences that are actually said.
Really it would be very verbous to say=A0
.i paunai ma= zekri prenu .i mi djuno lo du'u makau zekri prenu=A0.i mi djuno lo du&= #39;u la .djan. kau zekri prenu.....................

It's just not worth it.

<= /blockquote>

Or we could just say {la djan zekri prenu}.= In a real conversation, the difference between the two sentences, with and= without kau, is purely textual, AFAICT. Using {kau} conveys no extra meani= ng, and therefore leads me to believe that it's pointless to use.=A0
=A0

However, I doubt a bit that it is {kau}, not any other UI-cmavo that can s= erve this purpose.
Do we have a generalised UI-cmavo like we have {su'u} as a general= ised NU-cmavo?
{ge'e} speaks about emotions =A0so it won'= t work.


Guys, it's= ba'e. Can we please stop trying to use kau for things other than indir= ect questions? :)

I'm not sure if emphasis a= nd topic-comment structure are always identical.
=A0

No, of course they aren&#= 39;t the same, and I didn't say they were. {zo'u} is for topic-comm= ent structure, and {ba'e} is for emphasis. The CLL is right on that one= .
=A0
If you want to say "It's John, and not someone else, that is = the criminal" then why are you all pining for {la djan kau co'e} r= ather than {ba'e la djan co'e} ?
=A0
Next, {paunai} is defined as a rhetorical question. I don&#= 39;t know exactly what "rhetorical" means. For me this glossword = includes some emotions. But if {paunai} is just the opposite of {pau} and {= pau} is just a question marker then for me {paunai=3Dkau}.


A rhetorical question is a = sentence that appears to be a question, but isn't actually asking anyth= ing. "Who could *do* such a thing!?" could be a rhetorical questi= on. {kau} is not for "questions that aren't questions"; {kau}= is for *indirect questions*. Those are both *different* things, and theref= ore have *different* cmavo, albeit both UI.

.i mi'e la tsani mu'o

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;Lojban Beginners" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.= google.com/d/msg/lojban-beginners/-/76RjAIGKOLIJ.
=

=20 To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban-beginners+un= subscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/g= roup/lojban-beginners?hl=3Den.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= Lojban Beginners" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@= googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= -beginners?hl=3Den.
--e89a8f503b7235dd2704cc05e41b--