Received: from mail-ie0-f189.google.com ([209.85.223.189]:44175) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1Tf6Ab-0000xS-T9; Sun, 02 Dec 2012 01:49:12 -0800 Received: by mail-ie0-f189.google.com with SMTP id c11sf1782313ieb.16 for ; Sun, 02 Dec 2012 01:48:59 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=x-beenthere:date:from:to:message-id:in-reply-to:references:subject :mime-version:x-original-sender:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=7DCkuntq5btKULisp9vTZ7GIYHwjc3iDuWv8MMcBHpI=; b=mYVWPmhjMYzQwO3pAgtqQL0vQ3tbzzH6oBcuDvQOjZrXwPG2xQXGrnIj6QgDT50sO/ Jo1tC6FAHXbqFr45QFI/C3fzmslKLqNVcvGnEief/2eucdKF5ssbwCeUlFnHeP9d09k8 RuTEomWVbnIzAgeizHc+RHLqN4AoL4jPLCIua24JxquUYcgxWmWM/KtpXj+EAGLr7B6+ W/fFDemCDkzJIiCI4C9hdklKupAPANoHcXGN6fz7MuJsHJKbG0EiRsUmvkeBoIEbel5w U1QtumVZj2FR/UTH83dEFZPFI/o8AXumLFVq6DdLyOszwH8NQ8obXaiZrvU1WQeAWCX4 dcSw== Received: by 10.49.94.143 with SMTP id dc15mr1478562qeb.32.1354441739121; Sun, 02 Dec 2012 01:48:59 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.49.1.109 with SMTP id 13ls1277660qel.87.gmail; Sun, 02 Dec 2012 01:48:58 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.49.94.143 with SMTP id dc15mr1478561qeb.32.1354441738358; Sun, 02 Dec 2012 01:48:58 -0800 (PST) Date: Sun, 2 Dec 2012 01:48:56 -0800 (PST) From: la gleki To: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com Message-Id: In-Reply-To: References: <33272af0-7522-44d7-a040-e451bf851595@googlegroups.com> <3c1628ec-40a0-41fd-90a9-65e110d9ab0a@googlegroups.com> <748b91a9-e6b3-485e-8049-0f5d2521350e@googlegroups.com> Subject: Re: [lojban-beginners] Re: Why no "about" brivla? MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Original-Sender: gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com; contact lojban-beginners+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 300742228892 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_204_19783118.1354441736920" X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam_score: 0.0 X-Spam_score_int: 0 X-Spam_bar: / ------=_Part_204_19783118.1354441736920 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Sunday, December 2, 2012 1:32:48 PM UTC+4, aionys wrote: > > On Sun, Dec 2, 2012 at 1:03 AM, la gleki > > wrote: > >> On Sunday, December 2, 2012 11:15:01 AM UTC+4, aionys wrote: >> >>> On Sun, Dec 2, 2012 at 12:00 AM, la gleki wrote: >>> >>>> On Sunday, December 2, 2012 10:50:42 AM UTC+4, aionys wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Sat, Dec 1, 2012 at 11:09 PM, la gleki wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On Sunday, December 2, 2012 1:30:39 AM UTC+4, aionys wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Sat, Dec 1, 2012 at 6:17 AM, tijlan wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On 1 December 2012 12:09, ianek wrote: >>>>>>>> > This is just what {se srana} or {selra'a} is. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> An about, a thematic focus, is more specific than that. cfika2, for >>>>>>>> instance, may be as much relevant to cfika1 as cfika3 may be -- a >>>>>>>> work >>>>>>>> of fiction cu srana both its plot and its author (and possibly many >>>>>>>> other things). Consider: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> la .alis. cfika sera'a lo nixli >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> This doesn't necessarily say that the plot revolves around a girl -- >>>>>>>> it could as well be saying the work is dedicated to a girl. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I'm sorry, I don't see how anything based on {srana} could possibly >>>>>>> mean "dedicated to". You'll have to explain. >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Well, may be it's not that something is wrong with {sera'a/pe/srana} >>>>>> but rather wrong usage and/or glossing. >>>>>> >>>>>> *srana x1 pertains to/is germane/relevant to/concerns/is >>>>>> related/associated with/is about x2.* >>>>>> *ckini x1 is related to/associated with/akin to x2 by relationship >>>>>> x3.* >>>>>> >>>>>> If we arbitrarily chose parts of those definitions we'd get >>>>>> * srana x1 is relevant to x2 >>>>>> ckini x1 is relevant to x2 >>>>>> * >>>>>> which is nonsense. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> ckini wouldn't be that. For one thing, you left out the x3, and for >>>>> another, it isn't "relevant", it's "related". The Cold War isn't relevant >>>>> to WWII, but it is related (by being a direct result of it). >>>>> >>>> >>>> Sorry, it should be >>>> * srana x1 is releted to x2* >>>> * ckini x1 is related to x2 by relationship x3* >>>> >>> >>> Well, by that definition, srana is {ckini fi zi'o}, which makes them >>> synonyms in the same way that litru is to klama (litru = {klama zi'o zi'o}). >>> >> >> Haven't you read my previous post? I mean that choosing words from full >> definitions ARBITRARILY can lead to this result which is nonsense. >> ju'o it's all bad glossing. >> I suggest that srana refers to topic and ckini means "to be associated >> with". >> to dedicate is {finfriti}, {tecu'u} etc. >> > > No, ko'a srana ko'e means that ko'a is relevant to ko'e, i.e. ko'a has > something to do with ko'e. > > While it is true that the topic of something is pertinent, something which > is pertinent is not necessarily the topic. > Then what is your opinion about my first post? Is it true that "topic" brivla has right to exist on it's own? > > Roosevelt is pertinent to the Great Depression, but he is most certainly > /not/ the topic of it. > > >> (Btw, in my view, zi'o doesn't say that there is no such thing as >>> whatever place it's in, but just that it's not important. For example, >>> {ko'a klama zi'o zi'o ...} doesn't mean there /isn't/ an origin or >>> destination, it just means that they don't matter. Dissenters should use >>> zo'e instead.) >>> >> >> I think the CLL says almost the same. >> >> >>> >>> >>>> >>>>> >>>>>> If {srana} really gives us thematic role then all the other "is >>>>>> relevant to" meanings can be assigned to {ckini/seki'i}. >>>>>> >>>>> >>> -- >>> mu'o mi'e .aionys. >>> >>> .i.e'ucai ko cmima lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi.luk. mi patfu do zo'o >>> (Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. :D ) >>> >>> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "Lojban Beginners" group. >> To view this discussion on the web visit >> https://groups.google.com/d/msg/lojban-beginners/-/UZopTp21hiIJ. >> >> To post to this group, send email to lojban-b...@googlegroups.com >> . >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> lojban-beginne...@googlegroups.com . >> For more options, visit this group at >> http://groups.google.com/group/lojban-beginners?hl=en. >> > > > > -- > mu'o mi'e .aionys. > > .i.e'ucai ko cmima lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi.luk. mi patfu do zo'o > (Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. :D ) > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lojban Beginners" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/lojban-beginners/-/kQJ2iFS5UZ4J. To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban-beginners?hl=en. ------=_Part_204_19783118.1354441736920 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Sunday, December 2, 2012 1:32:48 PM UTC+4, aionys wrote:
On Sun, Dec= 2, 2012 at 1:03 AM, la gleki <gleki.is...@gmail= .com> wrote:
On Sunday, December 2, 2012 11:15:01 AM UTC+4, aionys wrote:
On Sun, Dec 2= , 2012 at 12:00 AM, la gleki <gleki.is...@gmail.com= > wrote:
On Sunday, December 2, 2012 10:50:42 AM UTC+4, aionys wrote:
On Sat, Dec 1, 201= 2 at 11:09 PM, la gleki <gleki.is...@gmail.com&= gt; wrote:
On Sunday, December 2, 2012 1:30:39 AM UTC+4, aionys wrote:
On Sat, Dec 1, 2012 at 6= :17 AM, tijlan <jbot...@gmail.com> wr= ote:

On 1 December 2012 12:09, ianek <jan...@gmail.com> wrote:=
> This is just what {se srana} or {selra'a} is.

An about, a thematic focus, is more specific than that. cfika2, for instance, may be as much relevant to cfika1 as cfika3 may be -- a work
of fiction cu srana both its plot and its author (and possibly many
other things). Consider:

la .alis. cfika sera'a lo nixli

This doesn't necessarily say that the plot revolves around a girl --
it could as well be saying the work is dedicated to a girl.

I'm sorry, I don't see how anything based on {srana} could possib= ly mean "dedicated to". You'll have to explain.

Well, may be it's not th= at something is wrong with {sera'a/pe/srana} but rather wrong usage and/or = glossing.

srana x1 pertains to/is germane/= relevant to/concerns/is related/associated with/is about x2.
ckini  x1 is related to/associated with/akin to x2 by relation= ship x3.

If we arbitrarily chose parts of thos= e definitions we'd get
  srana x1 is relevant to x2
  ck= ini  x1 is relevant to x2
which is nonsense.

ckini wouldn't= be that. For one thing, you left out the x3, and for another, it isn't "re= levant", it's "related". The Cold War isn't relevant to WWII, but it is rel= ated (by being a direct result of it).

Sorry, it should be = ;
  srana x1 is releted to x2
 = ; ckini  x1 is related to x2 by relationship x3

Well, by that definition, srana is {ckini fi zi'o}, which makes them synony= ms in the same way that litru is to klama (litru =3D {klama zi'o zi'o}).

Haven't you read = my previous post? I mean that choosing words from full definitions ARBITRAR= ILY can lead to this result which is nonsense.
ju'o it's all bad glossing.
I suggest that srana refers to t= opic and ckini means "to be associated with".
to dedicate is {fin= friti}, {tecu'u} etc.

No, ko'a srana ko'e means that ko'a is relevant to ko'e, i.e. ko'a has some= thing to do with ko'e.

While it is true that the topic of something = is pertinent, something which is pertinent is not necessarily the topic.

Then what is your opinion abo= ut my first post? Is it true that "topic" brivla has right to exist on it's= own?
 

Roosevelt is pertinent to the Great Depression, but he is most certainl= y /not/ the topic of it.
 
(Btw, in my view, zi'o doesn't say that there is no such thing as whatever = place it's in, but just that it's not important. For example, {ko'a klama z= i'o zi'o ...} doesn't mean there /isn't/ an origin or destination, it just = means that they don't matter. Dissenters should use zo'e instead.)

I think the CLL says alm= ost the same.
 
 
 
If {srana} reall= y gives us thematic role then all the other "is relevant to" meanings can b= e assigned to {ckini/seki'i}.

--
mu'o mi= 'e .aionys.

.i.e'ucai ko cmima lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi.luk. mi p= atfu do zo'o
(Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. :D )

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= Lojban Beginners" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.= google.com/d/msg/lojban-beginners/-/UZopTp21hiIJ.

=20 To post to this group, send email to lojban-b...@googlegroups.co= m.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban-beginne...@= googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/<= wbr>group/lojban-beginners?hl=3Den.



--
mu'o mi'e .= aionys.

.i.e'ucai ko cmima lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi.luk. mi patfu= do zo'o
(Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. :D )

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= Lojban Beginners" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/l= ojban-beginners/-/kQJ2iFS5UZ4J.
=20 To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@= googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= -beginners?hl=3Den.
------=_Part_204_19783118.1354441736920--